Cultural Heritage in the European Union: An Outsider’s Perspective
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTECultural Heritage in the European Union: An Outsider’s Perspective
Data publikacji: 26.06.2019
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2018, 2/2018 (4), s. 251 - 276
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.026.10380Autorzy
Cultural Heritage in the European Union: An Outsider’s Perspective
Cultural heritage protection has risen to the forefront of EU politics and policies in recent years, as a response to its intrinsic value and social benefits. Nonetheless, each Member State has its own legal definitions and approaches to cultural heritage protection, corresponding to their respective historical, social, political, and economic contexts. The principle of subsidiarity also entails a substantial amount of delegation, which means that bureaucratic obstacles are added to functional ones (lack of funds, geographical divides, etc.), which can inhibit the free exchange of information and communication. Accordingly, heritage protection is uneven across the EU not only due to varying conceptions of what constitutes heritage, but also as to who is considered an appropriate caretaker or stakeholder, and to what extent they should be involved. The present article provides an overview of the ongoing challenges to cultural heritage preservation and presents recommendations for improvement, from a non-EU citizen’s perspective. It focuses on two countries – the UK and Italy – as practical examples, given their wealth of cultural heritage but different approaches to protecting and managing the same. By investigating the results of these approaches from a critical and outside perspective, it is possible to glean what the underlying problems are and how they should be addressed for greater effectiveness.
Ahmad Y., The Scope and Definitions of Heritage: From Tangible to Intangible, “International Journal of Heritage Studies” 2006, Vol. 12(3).
Amaro S., Italy’s Anti-establishment Government Hopes the Rules Change in Its Favor Next May, “CNBC”, 9 October 2018, https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/09/italys-populist-government-hopes-the-rules-change-in-its-favor.html [accessed: 26.04.2019].
Aymerich M., Towards an Integrated Approach to Funding Cultural Heritage for Europe, 2015, http://www.europanostra.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/2015-FundingCulturalHeritage-EIB.pdf [accessed: 26.04.2019].
Belfiore E., Art as a Means of Alleviating Social Exclusion: Does It Really Work? A Critique of Instrumental Cultural Policies and Social Impact Studies in the UK, “International Journal of Cultural Policy” 2002, Vol. 8(1).
Benedikter R., Privatisation of Italian Cultural Heritage, “International Journal of Heritage Studies” 2004, Vol. 10(4).
Bodo C., Bodo S., Italy. Historical Perspective: Cultural Policies and Instruments, “Compendium: Cultural Policies and Trends”, 5 July 2016, https://www.culturalpolicies.net/web/italy.php [accessed: 26.04.2019].
Boesch B., The Art Collecting Legal Handbook, Thomson Reuters, London 2013.
BOP Consulting, Mapping the Creative Industries: A Toolkit, British Council, London 2010, https://creativeconomy.britishcouncil.org/media/uploads/files/English_mapping_the_creative_industries_a_toolkit_2-2.pdf [accessed: 26.04.2019].
Butcher J., Cultural Politics, Cultural Policy and Cultural Tourism, in: M.K. Smith, M. Robinson (eds.), Cultural Tourism in a Changing World: Politics, Participation and (Re)presentation, Channel View Publications, Bristol 2006.
Chamberlain K., Hausler K., United Kingdom, in: J.A.R. Nafziger, R.K. Paterson (eds.), Handbook on the Law of Cultural Heritage and International Trade, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham 2014.
Codice dei beni culturali e del paesaggio [Landscape and Cultural Heritage Code], 22 January 2004, Gazzetta Ufficiale Serie Generale No. 45.
Commission of the European Communities, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on a European agenda for culture in a globalizing world, 10 May 2007, COM (2007) 242 final.
Constitution of the Italian Republic, https://www.senato.it/documenti/repository/istituzione/costituzione_inglese.pdf [accessed: 26.04.2019].
Constitutional Law 3 of 18 October 2001, Gazzetta Ufficiale Serie Generale No. 248.
Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, 14 November 1970, 823 UNTS 231.
Council of Europe Convention on Offences relating to Cultural Property, 19 May 2017, CETS 221.
Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society, 27 October 2005, CETS 199.
Council of Europe, Compendium Short Profile: Italy, https://www.culturalpolicies.net/web/files/308/en/Italy.pdf [accessed: 26.04.2019].
Council of the European Union, Conclusions of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on a Work Plan for Culture (2015-2018), OJ C 463, 23.12.2014, p. 4.
Council of the European Union, Council conclusions of 21 May 2014 on cultural heritage as a strategic resource for a sustainable Europe, OJ C 183, 14.06.2014, p. 36.
Council of the European Union, Council conclusions of 26 November 2012 on Cultural Governance, OJ C 393, 19.12.2012, p. 8.
Council of the European Union, Council conclusions of 6 December on the Work Plan for Culture 2019-2022, OJ C 460/10, 21.12.2018, p. 12.
Council of the European Union, The Rome Declaration: Declaration of the leaders of 27 member states and of the European Council, the European Parliament and the European Commission, Statements and Remarks 149/17, 25 March 2017, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2017/03/25/rome-declaration/pdf [accessed: 26.04.2019].
Cultural Heritage Counts for Europe, Executive Summary of Cultural Heritage Counts for Europe Outcomes Report, July 2015, http://blogs.encatc.org/culturalheritagecountsforeurope/outcomes/ [accessed: 26.04.2019].
Day M., Italy’s Cultural Heritage at Risk Amid Neglect and Bad Management – With Private Sponsors Brought in to Help Protect Iconic Landmarks, “The Independent”, 17 May 2015, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/italys-cultural-heritage-at-riskamid-neglect-and-bad-management-with-private-sponsors-brought-in-to-10256659.html [accessed: 26.04.2019].
Francioni F., Public and Private in the International Protection of Global Cultural Goods, “The European Journal of International Law” 2012, Vol. 23(3).
Frigo M., Italy, in: J.A.R. Nafziger, R.K. Paterson (eds.), Handbook on the Law of Cultural Heritage and International Trade, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham 2014.
Gustafsson C., Stanojev J., Recommendations Forum “European Year of Cultural Heritage 2018: International Perspectives”, Cultural Diplomacy Platform, 31 May 2018, https://www.cultureinexternalrelations.eu/cier-data/uploads/2018/09/EYCH-2018-International-Perspectives.pdf [accessed: 26.04.2019].
Hausler K., FAQ: Cultural Heritage Post-Brexit, British Institute of International and Comparative Law, March 2018, https://www.biicl.org/brexitmaterials/culturalheritagepodcast [accessed: 26.04.2019].
Hesmondhalgh D., Pratt A.C., Cultural Industries and Cultural Policy, “International Journal of Cultural Policy” 2005, Vol. 11(1).
Holtorf C., Embracing Change: How Cultural Resilience is Increased Through Cultural Heritage, “World Archaeology” 2018.
Hosagrahar J. et al., Heritage, the UN Sustainable Development Goals, and the New Urban Agenda, “ICOMOS Concept Note on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (HABITAT III)”, 15 February 2016, https://www.usicomos.org/mainsite/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Final-Concept-Note.pdf [accessed: 26.04.2019].
Kisić V., Governing Heritage Dissonance. Promises and Realities of Selected Cultural Policies, European Cultural Foundation, Amsterdam 2016, https://www.europanostra.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Governing_Heritage_Dissonance.pdf [accessed: 26.04.2019].
Law 112 of 15 June 2002, Gazzetta Ufficiale Serie Generale No. 139.
Law 213 of 7 June 1999, Gazzetta Ufficiale Serie Generale No. 153.
Maltezou R., Greece Wants Parthenon Marbles Back, Tsipras Tells May, “Reuters”, 26 June 2018, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-greece-marbles/greece-wantsparthenon-marbles-back-tsipras-tells-may-idUSKBN1JM2T6 [accessed: 26.04.2019].
Moustaira E., Art Collections, Private and Public: A Comparative Legal Study, Springer, Cham 2015.
Nafziger J.A.R., Paterson R.K., Cultural Heritage Law, in: J.A.R. Nafziger, R.K. Paterson (eds.), Handbook on the Law of Cultural Heritage and International Trade, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham 2014.
Page A., The Implications of EU Withdrawal for the Devolution Settlement, prepared for the Culture, Tourism, Europe and External Relations Committee, 4 October 2016, http://www.parliament.scot/General%20Documents/The_implications_of_
EU_withdrawal_for_the_devolution_settlement.pdf [accessed: 26.04.2019].
Palumbo G., Privatization of State-Owned Cultural Heritage: A Critique of Recent Trends in Europe, in: N. Agnew, J. Bridgland (eds), Of the Past, for the Future: Integrating Archaeology and Conservation, The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles 2006.
Pasikowska-Schnass M., Cultural Heritage in EU Policies, European Parliamentary Research Service, June 2018, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2018/621876/EPRS_BRI(2018)621876_EN.pdf [accessed: 26.04.2019].
Pinton S., The Faro Convention, the Legal European Environment and the Challenge of Commons in Cultural Heritage, in: S. Pinton, L. Zagato (eds.), Cultural Heritage: Scenarios 2015-2017, Ca’ Foscari – Digital Publishing, Venice 2017.
Pratt A., Creative Cities: Tensions within and between Social, Cultural and Economic Development. A Critical Reading of the UK Experience, “City, Culture and Society” 2010, Vol. 1(1).
Presidential Decree 616 of 24 July 1977, Gazzetta Ufficiale Serie Generale No. 234.
Protocol No. 2 to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality (consolidated version), OJ C 326, 26.10.2012, p. 206.
Rizzo I., Cultural Heritage: Economic Analysis and Public Policy, in: V.A. Ginsburgh, D. Throsby (eds.), Handbook of Economics of Art and Culture, Vol. 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam 2006.
Rocks C., London’s Creative Industries – 2017 Update, Greater London Authority, July 2017, https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/working_paper_89-creative-industries-2017.pdf [accessed: 26.04.2019].
Scammell R., Saving Italy’s Cultural Heritage by Modern Means, “The Guardian”, 19 March 2015, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/19/saving-italys-cultural-heritage-by-modern-means [accessed: 26.04.2019].
Scammell R., The New British Caretaker of Italian Culture, “The Observer”, 26 June 2016, https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2016/jun/25/james-bradburne-british-museum-director-artistic-revolution-milan [accessed: 26.04.2019].
Sieber A., Local Knowledge as a Research Tool to Save Cultural Heritage, Council of Europe, 25 July 2018, https://rm.coe.int/faro-convention-topical-series-article-4-localknowledge-as-research-t/16808aa972 [accessed: 26.04.2019].
Squires N., Fashion House Gucci to Sponsor Restoration of Roman Cliff from Which Traitors Were Flung to Their Deaths, “The Telegraph”, 16 March 2019, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/03/16/fashion-house-gucci-sponsor-restoration-roman-cliff-traitors/[accessed: 26.04.2019].
Treaty on European Union (consolidated version), OJ C 326, 26.10.2012, p. 13.
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated version), OJ C 326, 26.10.2012, p. 47.
UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects, 24 June 1995, 34 ILM 1322.
Ventura C., Cassalia G., Della Spina L., New Models of Public-Private Partnership in Cultural Heritage Sector: Sponsorships between Models and Traps, “Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences” 2016, Vol. 223.
Vogt A., Italy’s Populist Government Brings In New Laws to Crack Down on Artefact Trafficking Amidst Nationalist Swell, “The Telegraph”, 4 November 2018, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/11/04/italys-populist-government-brings-new-laws-crack-artefact-trafficking/ [accessed: 26.04.2019].
Wecker M., Looted Vessels Returned at Event Marking 15 Years of US-Italy Art Crime Fighting Co-operation, “The Art Newspaper”, 6 November 2018, https://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/looted-vessels-returned-at-event-marking-15-years-of-us-italy-artcrime-fighting-co-operation [accessed: 26.04.2019].
Woodhouse A., Politi J., Populist Five Star Movement Secures 32% of Vote in Italian Election, “Financial Times”, 5 March 2018, https://www.ft.com/content/ecd89a82-2045-11e8-a895-1ba1f72c2c11 [accessed: 26.04.2019].
Zabeo S., Pellizzon D., Cultural Heritage in the Frame of European Funding Programmes: Challenges and Opportunities, in: S. Pinton, L. Zagato (eds.), Cultural Heritage: Scenarios 2015-2017, Ca’ Foscari – Digital Publishing, Venice 2017.
Informacje: Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2018, 2/2018 (4), s. 251 - 276
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Cultural Heritage in the European Union: An Outsider’s Perspective
Cultural Heritage in the European Union: An Outsider’s Perspective
Amineddoleh & Associates LLC, 43 West 43rd Street, Suite 171 New York, NY 10036, United States
Publikacja: 26.06.2019
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
AngielskiLiczba wyświetleń: 2435
Liczba pobrań: 1614