FAQ
logotyp Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego

Relacyjna specyfika perswazji w dziecięcych zabawach w przekonywanie

Data publikacji: 14.11.2016

Psychologia Rozwojowa, 2016, Tom 21, Numer 3, s. 69 - 88

https://doi.org/10.4467/20843879PR.16.017.5528

Autorzy

Anna Kołodziejczyk
Instytut Psychologii, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, ul. Ingardena 6, 30-060 Kraków
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Tytuły

Relacyjna specyfika perswazji w dziecięcych zabawach w przekonywanie

Abstrakt

Relational specificity of persuasion in children’s persuasive plays

Research suggests that social cognitive abilities, particularly social perspective-taking and theory of mind (ToM), play a role in the development of persuasion in early and middle childhood. In the presented study, the inner state talk and perspective-taking in a natural persuasive play context were studied to explore the relational specificity of persuading an adult or a peer. Ninety 5 to 7-year-olds participated in a novel persuasion role-play task in which children were invited to convince an interactive puppet-partner. The results showed that while persuading an adult, children more often included terms used to denote thoughts, memories, or knowledge, that is cognitive inner state talk, as compared to persuading a peer playmate, when they more often referred to emotional and motivational states. Talking about the personal perspective of the persuaded person or the shared perspective of both play-characters was connected with the use of direct-bilateral persuasive strategies, like compromise or bargaining.

Bibliografia

Astington J.W. (2003), Sometimes necessary, never sufficient: False-belief understanding and social competence. W: B. Repacholi, V. Slaughter (eds.), Individual Differences in Theory of Mind: Implications for Typical and Atypical Development, 13–38. New York: Psychology Press.

Bao Y., Fern E.F., Sheng S. (2007), Parental style and adolescent influence in family consumption decisions: An integrative approach. Journal of Business Research, 60, 672–680.

Bartsch K., London K. (2000), Children’s use of mental state information in selecting persuasive arguments. Developmental Psychology, 36, 352–365.

Bartsch K., London K., Campbell M.D. (2007), Children’s attention to beliefs in interactive persuasion tasks. Developmental Psychology, 43, 111–120.

Bartsch K., Wright J.C., Estes D. (2010), Young children’s persuasion in everyday conversation: Tactics and attunement to others’ mental states. Social Development, 19, 394–416.

Bartsch K., Wade Ch.E., Estes D. (2011), Children’s attention to others’ beliefs during persuasion: Improvised and selected arguments to puppets and people. Social Development, 20, 316–333.

Białecka-Pikul M. (2012). Narodziny i rozwój refleksji nad myśleniem. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

Burleson B.R., Applegate J.L., Burke J.A., Clark R.A., Delia J.G., Kline S.L. (1986), Communicative correlates of peer acceptance in childhood. Communication Education, 35, 349–361.

Clark R.A., Delia J.G. (1976), The development of functional persuasive skills in childhood and early adolescence. Child Development, 47, 1008–1014.

Cowan G., Drinkard J., MacGavin L. (1984), The effects of target, age, and gender on useof power strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1391–1398.

Dray A.J., Selman R.L. Schultz L.H. (2009), Communicating with intent: A study of social awareness and children’s writing. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 116–128.

Dunn J. (1999), New directions in research on children’s relationships and understanding. Social Development, 8, 137–141.

Dunn J., Brown J., Beardsall L. (1991), Family talk about feeling states and children’s later understanding of others’ emotions. Developmental Psychology, 27, 448–455.

Falbo T., Peplau L.A. (1980), Power strategies in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 618–628.

Finley G.E., Humphreys C.A. (1974), Naive psychology and the development of persuasive appeals in girls. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue, 6(1), 75–80.

Hughes C. (2011), Social Understanding and Social Lives: From Toddlerhood through to the Transition to School. London, NY: Psychology Press. Taylor & Francis Group.

Hughes C., Devine R.T. (2013), Theory of mind. W: D.S. Dunn (ed.), Oxford Bibliographies in Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hughes C., Devine R.T. (2015), A social perspective on theory of mind. W: M. Lamb (ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, 7th ed. Vol. III. Social, Emotional and Personality Development, 564–608. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Hughes C., Dunn J. (2002), “When I say a naughty word”. Children’s accounts of anger and sadness in self, mother and friend: Longitudinal findings from ages four to seven. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 515–535.

Hughes C., Lecce S., Wilson Ch. (2007), “Do you know what I want?” Preschoolers’ talkabout desires, thoughts and feelings in their conversations with sibs and friends. Cognitionand Emotion, 21, 330–350.

Hughes C., Marks A., Ensor R., Lecce S. (2010), A longitudinal study of conflict and inner-state talk in children’s conversations with mothers and young siblings. Social Development, 19, 822–837.

Jenkins J., Turrell S., Kogushi Y., Lollis S., Ross H. (2003), A longitudinal investigation of the dynamics of mental state talk in families. Child Development, 74, 905–920.

Kline S.L., Clinton B.L. (1998), Developments in children’s persuasive message practices. Communication Education, 47(2), 120–136.

Kołodziejczyk A. (2012), Korzystanie z informacji o przekonaniach w tworzeniu argumentu perswazyjnego. Rola rozumienia fałszywych przekonań pierwszego i drugiego rzędu. Psychologia Rozwojowa, 17(4), 45–62.

Kuhn D., Zillmer N., Cornwell A., Zavala J. (2013), Developing norms of argumentation: Metacognitive, epistemological, and social dimensions of developing argumentive competence. Cognition and Instruction, 31(4), 456–496.

Lee I.A., Preacher K.J. (2013, September), Calculation for the test of the difference between two dependent correlations with one variable in common: Computer software. Available from http://quantpsy.org.

Ohbuchi K.I., Yamamoto I. (1990), Power strategies of japanese children in interpersonal conflict: Effects of age, gender and target. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 151(3), 349–360.

Perner J., Brandl J., Garnham A. (2003), What is a perspective problem? Developmental issues in understanding belief and dual identity. FactaPhilosophica, 5, 355–378.

Perner J., Zauner P., Sprung M. (2005), What does “that” have to do with point of view? The case of conflicting desires and “want” in German. W: J.W. Astington, J. Baird (eds.), Why Language Matters for Theory of Mind, 220–244. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Slaughter V., Peterson C.C., Moore C. (2013), I can talk you into it: Theory of mind and persuasion behavior in young children. Developmental Psychology, 49, 227–231.

Wellman H. (2014), Making Minds: How Theory of Mind Develops. London: Oxford University Press.

Weiss D.M., Sachs J. (1991), Persuasive strategies used by preschool children. Discourse Processes, 14, 55–72.

Yeates K.O., Schultz L.H., Selman R.L. (1991). The development of interpersonal negotiation strategies in thought and action: A social-cognitive link to behavioral adjustment and social status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 37, 3, 369–405.

Informacje

Informacje: Psychologia Rozwojowa, 2016, Tom 21, Numer 3, s. 69 - 88

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:

Relacyjna specyfika perswazji w dziecięcych zabawach w przekonywanie

Angielski:

Relational specificity of persuasion in children’s persuasive plays

Autorzy

Instytut Psychologii, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, ul. Ingardena 6, 30-060 Kraków

Publikacja: 14.11.2016

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: Żadna

Udział procentowy autorów:

Anna Kołodziejczyk (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Polski