„Archival Science” – Aims and scope, https://www.springer.com/journal/10502/aims-and-scope [dostęp: 7.08.2020].

Agostinho D., Archival encounters: rethinking access and care in digital colonial archives, „Archival Science” 2019, t. 19, z. 2, s. 141–165.

Anderson K., The footprint and the stepping foot: archival records, evidence, and time, „Archival Science” 2013, t. 13, z. 4, s. 349–371.

Barber S., Who owns knowledge? Heritage, intellectual property and access in and to the history of Antigua and Barbuda, „Archival Science” 2012, t. 12, z. 1, s. 1–17.

Bieliński J., Iwińska K., Rosińska-Kordasiewicz A., Analiza danych jakościowych przy użyciu programów komputerowych, „ASK: społeczeństwo, badania, metody” 2007, nr 16, s. 89–114.

Black S., The implications of digital collection takedown requests on archival appraisal, „Archival Science” 2020, t. 20, z. 1, s. 91–101.

Castan M., Debeljak J., Indigenous peoples’ human rights and the Victorian Charter: a framework for reorienting recordkeeping and archival practice, „Archival Science” 2012, t. 12, z. 2, s. 213–233.

Caswell M., Gabiola J., Zavala J., Brilmyer G., Cifor M., Imagining transformative spaces: the personal–political sites of community archives, „Archival Science” 2018, t. 18, z. 1, s. 73–93.

Chilcott A., Towards protocols for describing racially offensive language in UK public archives, „Archival Science” 2019, t. 19, z. 4, s. 359–376.

Cifor M., Affecting relations: introducing affect theory to archival discourse, „Archival Science” 2016, t. 16, z. 1, s. 7–31.

Cook T., Evidence, memory, identity, and community: four shifting archival paradigms, „Archival Science” 2013, t. 13, z. 2–3, s. 95–120.

Cooper D., House proud: an ethnography of the BC Gay and Lesbian Archives, „Archival Science” 2016, t. 16, z. 3, s. 261–288.

Creswell J.W., Projektowanie badań naukowych. Metody jakościowe, ilościowe i mieszane, tłum. J. Gilewicz, Kraków 2013, s. 201–202.

Dominy G., Overcoming the apartheid legacy: the special case of the Freedom Charter, „Archival Science” 2013, t. 13, z. 2–3, s. 195–205.

Dominy G., The effects of an administrative and policy vacuum on access to archives in South Africa, „Archival Science” 2017, t. 17, z. 4, s. 393–408.

Dritsas L., Haig J., An archive of identity: the Central African Archives and Southern Rhodesian history, „Archival Science” 2014, t. 14, z. 1, s. 35–54.

Duff W.M., Flinn A., Suurtamm K.E., Wallace D. A., Social justice impact of archives: a preliminary investigation, „Archival Science” 2013, t. 13, z. 4, s. 317–348.

Duranti L., Rogers C., Educating for trust, „Archival Science” 2011, t. 11, z. 3–4, s. 373–390.

Eito-Brun R., Context-based aggregation of archival data: the role of authority records in the semantic landscape, „Archival Science” 2015, t. 15, z. 3, s. 217–238.

Galuba R., Archiwa państwowe w latach 1918–2011. Podstawy prawne działalności, wyd. 2, Poznań 2013.

Garaba F., Mahlasela Z., The University of Fort Hare’s (UFH) corporate memory in the spotlight: retracing the institution’s centenary history through visual documentation, „Archival Science” 2018, t. 18, z. 3, s. 241–255.

Garcia P., Documenting and classifying labor: the effect of legal discourse on the treatment of H-2A workers, „Archival Science” 2014, t. 14, z. 3–4, s. 345–363.

Gilliland A., Neutrality, social justice and the obligations of archival education and educators in the twenty-first century, „Archival Science” 2011, t. 11, z. 3–4, s. 193–209.

Gooda M., The practical power of human rights: how international human rights standards can inform archival and record keeping practices, „Archival Science” 2012, t. 12, z. 2, s. 141–150.

Haberstock L., Participatory description: decolonizing descriptive methodologies in archives, „Archival Science” 2020, t. 20, z. 2, s. 125–138.

Halilovich H., Reclaiming erased lives: archives, records and memories in post-war Bosnia and the Bosnian diaspora, „Archival Science” 2014, t. 14, z. 3–4, s. 231–247.

Hastings E., “No longer a silent victim of history:” repurposing the documents of Japanese American internment, „Archival Science” 2011, t. 11, z. 1–2, s. 25–46.

Henttonen P., Privacy as an archival problem and a solution, „Archival Science” 2017, t. 17, z. 3, s. 285–303.

Horsman P., Ketelaar E., Thomassen T., Presenting archival science, „Archival Science” 2001, t. 1, z. 1, s. 1–2.

Janke T., Iacovino L., Keeping cultures alive: archives and Indigenous cultural and intellectual property rights, „Archival Science” 2012, t. 12, z. 2, s. 151–171.

Johnston J.A., Wallace D.A., Punzalan R.L., Messages sent, and received? Changing perspectives and policies on US federal email as record and the limits of archival accountability, „Archival Science” 2019, t. 19, z. 4, s. 309–329.

Ketelaar E., Ten years of archival science, „Archival Science” 2010, t. 10, z. 4, s. 345–352.

Lemieux V.L., Visual analytics, cognition and archival arrangement and description: studying archivists’ cognitive tasks to leverage visual thinking for a sustainable archival future, „Archival Science” 2015, t. 15, z. 1, s. 25–49.

Lowry J., “Displaced archives”: proposing a research agenda, „Archival Science” 2019, t. 19, z. 4, s. 349–358.

MacNeil H., What finding aids do: archival description as rhetorical genre in traditional and web-based environments, „Archival Science” 2012, t. 12, z. 4, s. 485–500.

Mattern E., A six-stage process for recovery of public records: replevin and the state of North Carolina, „Archival Science” 2016, t. 16, z. 2, s. 195–212.

McKemmish S., Faulkhead S., Russell L., Distrust in the archive: reconciling records, „Archival Science” 2011, t. 11, z. 3–4, s. 211–239.

Morse B.W., Indigenous human rights and knowledge in archives, museums, and libraries: some international perspectives with specific reference to New Zealand and Canada, „Archival Science” 2012, t. 12, z. 2, s. 113–140.

Navarro D., Research and secrecy: dealing with archives of intelligence services in Spain, „Archival Science” 2017, t. 17, z. 4, s. 331–348.

Niedbalski J., CAQDAS ‐ oprogramowanie do komputerowego wspomagania analizy danych jakościowych. Historia, ewolucja i przyszłość, „Przegląd Socjologiczny” 2013, nr 1(62), s. 153–166.

Ormond-Parker L., Sloggett R., Local archives and community collecting in the digital age, „Archival Science” 2012, t. 12, z. 2, s. 191–212.

Pacios A.R., La Torre Merino J.L., Spanish historic archives’ use of websites as a management transparency vehicle, „Archival Science” 2018, t. 18, z. 2, s. 185–205.

Packalén S., Henttonen P., Recordkeeping professionals’ understanding of and justification for functional classification: Finnish public sector organizational context, „Archival Science” 2016, t. 16, z. 4, s. 403–419.

Pęksa W., Prawo archiwalne – wprowadzenie do zagadnienia, [w:] Prawo archiwalne. Stan aktualny i perspektywy zmian, red. H. Robótka, Toruń 2007, s. 17–28.

Pickard A.J., Research Methods in Information, wyd. 2, Londyn 2013, s. 97–187.

Price D.M., Smith J.J., The trust continuum in the information age: a Canadian perspective, „Archival Science” 2011, t. 11, z. 3–4, s. 253–276.

Robinson G., Break the rules, save the records: human rights archives and the search for justice in East Timor, „Archival Science” 2014, t. 14, z. 3–4, s. 323–343.

Ryszewski B., Archiwistyka: przedmiot, zakres, podział, Warszawa–Poznań 1972, s. 89–96.

Ryszewski B., Problemy i metody badawcze archiwistyki, Toruń 1985.

Saldaña J., The coding manual for qualitative researchers, Londyn 2009.

Sztumski J., Wstęp do metod i technik badań społecznych, wyd. 4, Katowice 1995.

Tough A.G., Oral culture, written records and understanding the twentieth-century colonial archive. The significance of understanding from within, „Archival Science” 2012, t. 12, z. 3, s. 245–265.

Valderhaug G., Memory, justice and the public record, „Archival Science” 2011, t. 11, z. 1–2, s. 13–23.

Wallace D.A., Pasick P., Berman Z., Weber E., Stories for Hope–Rwanda: a psychological– archival collaboration to promote healing and cultural continuity through intergenerational dialogue, „Archival Science” 2014, t. 14, z. 3–4, s. 275–306.

Wallace D.A., Stuchell L., Understanding the 9/11 Commission archive: control, access, and the politics of manipulation, „Archival Science” 2011, t. 11, z. 1–2, s. 125–168.

Wilson I.E., “Peace, order and good government”: archives in society, „Archival Science” 2012, t. 12, z. 2, s. 235–244.

Yaco S., Betancourt Hardy B., Historians, archivists, and social activism: benefits and costs, „Archival Science” 2013, t. 13, z. 2–3, s. 253–272.