Institutional trust. Rainmaking effect and institutionalization of distrust?
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEZaufanie do władz publicznych. Efekt zaklinania deszczu a instytucjonalizacja nieufności
Publication date: 16.10.2018
Zoon Politikon, 2017, 8/2017, pp. 61 - 86
https://doi.org/10.4467/2543408XZOP.17.003.9262Authors
Zaufanie do władz publicznych. Efekt zaklinania deszczu a instytucjonalizacja nieufności
The paper presents selected positions emerging in debate over the causes and effects of trust in institutions that has been going on for several decades. One of the key issues is the question of the balance between trust, ne-cessary for the efficient functioning of the democratic system, including public institutions, and the distrust of citizens, necessary for their social control. The above question becomes particularly important in a situation of low public trust in government and growing popularity of radical social and political movements. According to many researchers, the failure of the existing forms of institutionalization of distrust poses a significant threat to the current social and political order.
Abstrakt
Artykuł przedstawia wybrane stanowiska w toczonej od kilku dekad debacie dotyczącej kryzysu zaufania do władz publicznych. Jedną z kluczowych kwestii jest zapewnienie równowagi pomiędzy zaufaniem, niezbędnym do sprawnego funkcjonowania systemu demokratycznego, a uzasadnioną nieufnością obywateli, konieczną do ich społecznej kontroli. Pytanie to nabiera szczególnego znaczenia w sytuacji niskiego poziomu zaufania wobec władz publicznych i rosnącej popularności radykalnych ruchów społecznych i politycznych. Zdaniem wielu badaczy, zawodność dotychczasowych mechanizmów instytucjonalizacji nieufności stanowi istotne zagrożenie dla dotychczasowego porządku społecznego i politycznego.
This Article is made in Open Access, available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode.pl
Baier A. (1986), Trust and Anti-Trust, “Ethics” Vol. 96
Bouckaert G. (2012). Trust and public administration, “Administration” Vol. 60, No. 1
Bouckaert G., Van de Walle, S., Maddens, B., Kampen, J. (2002), Identity vs. performance: An overview of theories explaining trust in government. Second report on quality and trust in government, Public Management Institute, Leuven
Bryk, A., Schneider B., (2002), Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement, Russell Sage Foundation, New York
Cook K., Santana J. (2018), Trust and Rational Choice, w: Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust, (ed.) Uslaner E., Oxford University Press, Oxford
Easton D., (1965) A System Analysis of Political Life, Wiley, New York
Epstein P., Wray l., Marshall M., Grifel S. (2000), Engaging Citizens in Achieving Results that Matter: A Model for Effective 21st Century Governance, Proceedings of the ASPA CAP Symposium on Results-oriented Government
European Governance (2001), A White Paper, European Commission, Brussels
Fukuyama F. (1995), Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, Free Press, New York
Garfinkel H. (1963), A Conception of, and Experiments with 'Trust' as a Condition of Stable Concerted Actions, w: Motivation and Social Interaction: Cognitive Determinants, (ed.) Harvey O.J., Ronald Press Co., New York
Giddens A. (1995), Politics, Sociology and Social Theory: Encoun-ters with Classical and Contemporary Social Thought, Stanford University Press, Stanford
Governance and Development (1992), The World Bank, Washington
Hardin R. (1998), Trust in Government, w: Trust and Governance, (eds.) Braithwaite V., Levi M., Russell Sage Foundation, New York
Hardin R. (2002), Trust and Trustworthiness, Russell Sage Foundation, New York
Harisalo R., Miettinen (1997), Trust capital. The third force of en-trepreneurship, Tampere University. Department of Administra-tive Sciences, Tampere
Henslin J.M. (1972), What Makes for Trust? w: Down to Earth Sociology, (ed.) Henslin J.M., Free Press, New York
Hibbing J.R., Theiss-Morse E. (1995), Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes Toward American Political Institutions, Cambridge University Press, New York
How’s Life? Measuring Well-being (2017), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris
Lewicki, R., Bunker B.B. (1996), Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships, w: Trust in Organisations: Frontiers of Theory and Researc, (eds.) Kramer R., Tyler T., Sage, Thousand Oaks
Loveless T. (1997), The structure of public confidence in education, “American Journal of Education” Vol. 105, No. 2
Luhmann N. (1979), Trust and Power, J. Wiley, New York
Luhmann N. (1998), Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives, w: Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Rela-tions, (ed.) Gambetta D., Basil Blackwell, Oxford
Mishler W., Rose R. (1997), Trust, distrust and skepticism: Popular evaluations of civil and political institutions in post-Communist societies, “Journal of Politics”Vol. 59
Mitchell T., Scott W. (1987), Leadership Failures, the Distrusting Public and Prospects of the Administrative State, “Public Admini-stration Review” Vol. 47, No. 6
Newton K., Stolle D., Zmerli. S. (2018), Social and Political Trust, w: Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust, (ed.) Uslaner E., Oxford University Press, Oxford
Norris P. (2011), Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Norris P (1999), Introduction: the Growth of Critical Citizens, w: Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governanc, (ed. Norris P., Oxford University Press, Oxford
OECD (2013), Trust in government, policy effectiveness and the governance agenda, w: Government at a Glance 2013, OECD Publishing, Paris
Offe C. (1999), How Can We Trust Our Fellow Citizens?, w: Demo-cracy and Trust, (ed.) Warren M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Offe C. (2006), Political Institutions and Social Power. Conceptual Explanations. w: Rethinking Political Institutions, (eds.) Shapiro I., Skowronek S., Galvin D., New York University Press, New York
Osborne D., Gaebler T. (2005), Rządzić inaczej, Media Rodzina, Poznań
Pew Research Centre (2017), Public Trust in Government Remains Near Historic Lows as Partisan Attitudes Shift, http://www.people-press.org/2017/05/03/public-trust-in-government-remains-near-historic-lows-as-partisan-attitudes-shift/
Public Opinion In the European Union (2015), Special Eurobarome-ter 83, Spring, European Commission
Rosanvallon P. (2008a), Counter-Democracy. Politics In the Age of Distrust, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Rosanvallon P. (2008b), Nieufność i demokracja, „Dialogi politycz-ne” nr 10
Sako M. (1992), Prices, Quality and Trust: Inter-Firm Relations in Britain & Japan, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Stipak B. (1979), Citizen satisfaction with urban services: Potential misuse as a performance indicator, “Public Administration Review” Vol. 39
Szlaszyńska A., (2008), Społeczeństwo niepewności w dobie kontr-demokracji. Wprowadzenie do myśli Pierre’a Rosanvallona, „Dialogi Polityczne” nr 10
Sztompka P. (1999), Trust: A Sociological Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Sztompka P. (2007), Zaufanie. Fundament społeczeństwa, Wyd. Znak, Kraków
Tilly Ch., (2007), Democracy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Warren M.E., (2018), Trust and Democracy, w: Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust, (ed.) Uslaner E., Oxford University Press, Oxford
Williamson O. (1993), Calculativeness, Trust, and Economic Organization, “The Journal of Law & Economics” Vol. 36, No. 1
Information: Zoon Politikon, 2017, 8/2017, pp. 61 - 86
Article type: Original article
Titles:
Zaufanie do władz publicznych. Efekt zaklinania deszczu a instytucjonalizacja nieufności
Institutional trust. Rainmaking effect and institutionalization of distrust?
Collegium Civitas
Published at: 16.10.2018
Article status: Open
Licence: CC BY-SA
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
PolishView count: 1011
Number of downloads: 3040