Internal Security Review, Issue 29 (15), 2023, pp. 13 - 38
https://doi.org/10.4467/20801335PBW.23.018.18760Internal Security Review, Issue 29 (15), 2023, pp. 39 - 62
https://doi.org/10.4467/20801335PBW.23.019.18761Internal Security Review, Issue 29 (15), 2023, pp. 63 - 93
https://doi.org/10.4467/20801335PBW.23.020.18762Internal Security Review, Issue 29 (15), 2023, pp. 95 - 130
https://doi.org/10.4467/20801335PBW.23.021.18763Internal Security Review, Issue 29 (15), 2023, pp. 131 - 144
https://doi.org/10.4467/20801335PBW.23.022.18764Internal Security Review, Issue 29 (15), 2023, pp. 145 - 160
https://doi.org/10.4467/20801335PBW.23.023.18765Internal Security Review, Issue 29 (15), 2023, pp. 161 - 180
https://doi.org/10.4467/20801335PBW.23.024.18766Internal Security Review, Issue 29 (15), 2023, pp. 181 - 190
https://doi.org/10.4467/20801335PBW.23.025.18767Internal Security Review, Issue 29 (15), 2023, pp. 191 - 196
https://doi.org/10.4467/20801335PBW.23.026.18768Internal Security Review, Issue 29 (15), 2023, pp. 199 - 214
https://doi.org/10.4467/20801335PBW.23.027.18769Wpływ Stanów Zjednoczonych na Jednostkę Wojskową GROM w latach 1989–2021 w perspektywie porównawczej
Internal Security Review, Issue 29 (15), 2023, pp. 215 - 235
https://doi.org/10.4467/20801335PBW.23.028.18770Internal Security Review, Issue 29 (15), 2023, pp. 239 - 240
Internal Security Review, Issue 29 (15), 2023, pp. 241 - 266
https://doi.org/10.4467/20801335PBW.23.029.18771Internal Security Review, Issue 29 (15), 2023, pp. 267 - 290
https://doi.org/10.4467/20801335PBW.23.030.18772Internal Security Review, Issue 29 (15), 2023, pp. 291 - 322
https://doi.org/10.4467/20801335PBW.23.031.18773Internal Security Review, Issue 29 (15), 2023, pp. 323 - 358
https://doi.org/10.4467/20801335PBW.23.032.18774Internal Security Review, Issue 29 (15), 2023, pp. 359 - 372
https://doi.org/10.4467/20801335PBW.23.033.18775Internal Security Review, Issue 29 (15), 2023, pp. 373 - 385
https://doi.org/10.4467/20801335PBW.23.034.18776Internal Security Review, Issue 29 (15), 2023, pp. 387 - 406
https://doi.org/10.4467/20801335PBW.23.035.18777Słowa kluczowe: hybrid activities, hybrid threats, hybrid warfare, state security, state resilience, Belarus, Russia, Poland, NATO, mirror principle, asymmetric threats, hybrid threats, FSB, SBU, VChK, GPU, offensive counterintelligence, disorganisation, infiltration, Russian-Ukrainian conflict, intelligence, intelligence cycle, intelligence analysis, source reliability, information reliability, Second Department of Polish General Staff, chemical weapons, Poland, Germany, intelligence, indicator analysis, intelligence, counterintelligence, espionage, agent, Latvia, president, assassination, crime, preparation, destabilisation of the state, Russian Federation, People’s Republic of China, natural gas, oil, hydrocarbons, U.S. Special Operations Forces, DEVGRU, Delta Force, GROM, Polish Special Forces, hybrid activities, hybrid threats, hybrid warfare, state security, state resilience, Belarus, Russia, Poland, NATO, mirror principle, asymmetric threats, hybrid threats, FSB, SBU, VChK, GPU, offensive counterintelligence, disorganisation, infiltration, Russian-Ukrainian conflict, intelligence, intelligence cycle, intelligence analysis, source reliability, information reliability, Second Department of Polish General Staff, chemical weapons, Poland, Germany, intelligence, indicator analysis, intelligence, counterintelligence, espionage, agent, Latvia, president, assassination, crime, preparation, destabilisation of the state