FAQ

Volume 5, Issue 2

Volume 5 (2012) Next

Publication date: 09.12.2012

Description
Volume Editors: prof. dr hab. Dorota Malec, prof. dr hab. Wacław Uruszczak, dr Maciej Mikuła

Licence: None

Editorial team

Issue Editors prof. dr hab. Wacław Uruszczak, prof. dr hab. Dorota Malec, dr Maciej Mikuła

Issue content

Adam Perłakowski

Cracow Studies of Constitutional and Legal History, Volume 5, Issue 2, Volume 5 (2012), pp. 133 - 147

https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.12.011.0912

Józef Andrzej Załuski, bishop of Kiev and the alleged author of Opisanie krótkie niektórych interessów wewnętrznych Najjaśniejszej Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w roku 1762 (Brief description of some internal interests of the Eminent Polish Nobiliary Republic in 1762), tried to survey a series of opinions and reflections on the constitutional system of Poland at the decline of the reign of August III of Vettin dynasty and the beginning of reign of Stanisław August Poniatowski. The major element of Załuski’s analysis is his attitude toward liberum veto which was one of the most crucial elements of the Polish constitutional system. While perceiving the negative aspect of the abuse arising from the liberum veto, Załuski considered the latter to be the immanent part of the Polish constitution. He therefore regarded the liberum veto as something unavoidable and as something what produced a counterbalance vis-à-vis the voting by majority, the latter being applied in England, Sweden and Denmark. It is easy to observe that Załuski was a firm opponent of the majority vote system. What – in his opinion - was detrimental to the Polish Republic was the absence of the effective implementation of good laws. As a result he did not see any need for the introduction of new constitutional devices. The volume published by the bishop of Kiev assumed, to a large extent, also the shape of polemics conducted by him with Stanisław Konarski and with the treaty of the latter On the Effective Advice.

Read more Next

Piotr Suski

Cracow Studies of Constitutional and Legal History, Volume 5, Issue 2, Volume 5 (2012), pp. 149 - 162

https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.12.012.0913

The paper analyses the legal construction of the shares of Polish public companies in the 18th century. The analysis relied on the statutes and documents referring to the shares. The Woolen Products Manufacturing Company founded in 1766 should be considered the first Polish public company. Before 1795, i.e. after Poland lost her independence due to the third partition of the country, there had been established as many as seven companies of that type. The surviving projects of statutes show that the founding of several other companies was planned. The period in which the first Polish companies functioned was short and most of them were dissolved within a few years after they had been founded. This was due inter alia to the difficulties in collecting the capital fund. The preserved source materials allow for the analysis of the legal nature and function performed by the shares in the construction of these companies. The author believes that – in the light of statutory provisions and the documents referring to the shares - it is possible to regard the shares connected with the companies as a part of joint stock capital and the entirety of the rights of the shareholders and also disposable securities. In particular, the shares of the first Polish public companies may be attributed the nature of the part of joint stock capital of the value determined in the statute. This capital, collected through contributions made by the partners in return for obtaining a specified number of shares, was the basis on which there functioned each of the companies subjected to the analysis.

Read more Next

Paweł Malec-Lewandowski

Cracow Studies of Constitutional and Legal History, Volume 5, Issue 2, Volume 5 (2012), pp. 163 - 177

https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.12.013.0914
The paper discusses the nature and the specificacy of the Polish deputy’s mandate as viewed in the light of the Polish Four-Year Seym’s legislation, and above all in the light of the statute on "Sejmiks" and also in the light of Constitution of 3 May 1791. The paper tries to answer whether – on the basis of the aforementioned provisions – the discussed mandate was open or imperative. In order to arrive at the correct answer the author outlines the scope of the analyzed problem. Thus he studies the relationship between the deputies and their electorate, the circles of the former and the latter, the methods applied for the election of deputies and the question of the possible instruction imposed on the deputies and the binding force of the instruction. He also discusses the reporting to which the deputies were obligated upon returning from the session. In the area of these questions the author tries to confront the regulations contained in the statute on the Sejmiks and those provided by the Constitution of 3 May. On the basis of the analysis made by him the author arrives at the conclusion that – in the light of the Four-Year Seym legisilation – the mandate was open. This meant that the concept of imperative mandate was rejected. The paper tries to sum up what previously was established in the research on the problem. In addition the author explores the extent to which the idea of legal accountability of deputies to their electorate might have affected the nature of the deputy’s mandate.
Read more Next

Tomasz Wieciech

Cracow Studies of Constitutional and Legal History, Volume 5, Issue 2, Volume 5 (2012), pp. 179 - 191

https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.12.014.0915
The doctrine of nullification was one of the most important threads developed in the American political and legal papers published in the early Republic. The doctrine functioned as an element of Republican constitutionalism whose foundations grew in the millieu of democratic republicans in the last decade of the 18th century. The nullification was tantamount to the right of the States to annul the federal laws that the States found to be inconsistent with the federal Constitution. The doctrine of nullification is detectable in the papers written by John Taylor but its formulation is due to Thomas Jefferson who drew up its assumptions in the project of the Resolution of the Kentucky in 1798. In the course of time the doctrine laid the foundations for the procedure designed to settle disputes within the American federal system and functioned as an alternative device vis-à-vis the judicial review.
Read more Next

Michał Baczkowski

Cracow Studies of Constitutional and Legal History, Volume 5, Issue 2, Volume 5 (2012), pp. 193 - 207

https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.12.015.0916
In 1796–1815 Cracow had a relatively large military garrison, composed at first (until 1809) by the Austrian, and later (until 1813) by the Polish army. The garrison was eventually (until 1815) made up of the Russian troops. The presence of the military units caused conflicts with the civilians mostly due to the assignment of living quarters, arbitrary seizure of apartments by the officers and due to drunkness. What was also reported were the robberies, batteries and, in single cases, the homicide. The largest incidence of offences as committed by the Austrian army was reported in 1809 during its war against the army of the Duchy of Warsaw while the largest number of offences commited by the Russian soldiers was observed at the time when they occupied the town (1814–1815). This shows that the scale of crime was bound with the current political situation and with the absence of supervision as exercised by the officers over the soldiers, the officers’ attitude toward the inhabitants of Cracow being, as a rule, hostile.
Read more Next

Paweł Cichoń

Cracow Studies of Constitutional and Legal History, Volume 5, Issue 2, Volume 5 (2012), pp. 209 - 222

https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.12.016.0917
The monograph produced by M. Mycielski discusses the policy pursued by the government of the Kingdom of Poland toward the Seymiks and commune assemblies and toward the elections to the Chamber of Deputies and the Voivodship Councils that were carried out in the Seymiks and commune assemblies in 1817-1830. The monograph shows the authentic functioning of the electoral assemblies, thereby proving that the Polish nation regarded the State as their own institution and that the electoral assemblies secured the sense of national sovereignty. The first chapter presents the administrative provisions that were of binding force in the 1820s. The chapter discusses also their origin as well as those of their versions that were rejected. It points to the entire bills that never came into force. The next chapter tries to show how numerous the electoral assemblies were. The third chapter, in its turn, analyses the governmental activities in the area of electoral practices and the problems arising from them. In this chapter there were discussed inter alia the right to vote, the method of proposing the candidates, casting and counting the votes, locations for holdingg the electoral assemblies, organizing feasts, drawing up the lists of candidates for the respective posts, and also nullifying the incorrectly held Seymiks and electoral assemblies. The fourth chapter was designed to characterize the direct involvement of the authorities in the electoral struggle. The latter tended toward eliminating the candidates of the opposition and promoting those that were supported by the authorities, the candidates for the members of the House of Deputies and those for the Voivodship Councils being at stake. The author of the monograph tried also to demonstrate the effectiveness of the described activities and show the causes of success or failure of administration in this area.
Read more Next