Measuring the satisfaction and frustration of basic psychological needs in the workplace
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEMeasuring the satisfaction and frustration of basic psychological needs in the workplace
Zarządzanie Publiczne, 2021, Numer 4 (56), s. 183 - 193
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843968ZP.21.010.17872Autorzy
Measuring the satisfaction and frustration of basic psychological needs in the workplace
Researchers have been looking at the issue of psychological need satisfaction in the workplace since the 1930s. Self-Determination Theory (SDT), a concept that emerged in the 1980s, stands out from other theories by uniquely capturing basic psychological needs as (1) innate and (2) promoting psychological growth, internalization, and well-being. Allowing basic psychological needs to be met at work is essential for autonomous work motivation, positive attitudes, good behaviors, and employee well-being, while frustration of basic psychological needs at work is associated with higher levels of job insecurity, engaging in unproductive behavior at work, and higher stress related to work, which in turn predicts higher levels of somatic symptoms, emotional exhaustion, and absenteeism from work due to illness. Therefore, it is crucial to measure basic need satisfaction and frustration at work and adjust management to improve on these dimensions. The purpose of the research is to review the research tools used to measure the satisfaction and frustration of basic psychological needs at work within the SDT framework. To achieve the research objective, the review of scientific literature available in the EBSCOhost database: APA PsycInfo, APA PsycArticles on the keyword “basic psychological needs” AND “self-determination theory” AND “scale” was done along with reviewing the research tools available on the Center for Self-Determination Theory website. The collection obtained was completed using the snowball technique. A comprehensive and up-to-date review of tools used to measure satisfaction (and frustration) of basic psychological needs in the workplace was established within the framework of Deci and Ryan’s SDT.
Pomiar satysfakcji i frustracji podstawowych potrzeb psychicznych w miejscu pracy
Badacze od lat 30. XX wieku analizują kwestię zaspokajania potrzeb psychicznych w miejscu pracy. Teorię autodeterminacji (SDT), która pojawiła się w latach 80., wyróżnia spośród innych koncepcji unikalne ujęcie podstawowych potrzeb psychicznych jako (1) wrodzonych i (2) promujących wzrost psychiczny, internalizację i dobrostan. Umożliwienie zaspokojenia podstawowych potrzeb psychicznych w pracy jest kluczowe dla przejawiania przez pracowników autonomicznej motywacji do pracy, pozytywnych postaw oraz korzystnych dla organizacji zachowań. Ponadto, jest ono kluczowe dla ich dobrostanu, podczas gdy frustracja podstawowych potrzeb psychicznych w pracy wiąże się dla pracowników z wyższym poziomem niepewności zatrudnienia, angażowaniem się w nieproduktywne zachowania w miejscu pracy oraz wyższym stresem związanym z pracą, co z kolei koreluje z wyższym poziomem objawów somatycznych, wyczerpania emocjonalnego oraz nieobecności w pracy ze względu na chorobę. Dlatego kluczowy jest pomiar zaspokojenia i frustracji podstawowych potrzeb psychicznych w pracy oraz dostosowywanie systemu zarządzania w celu poprawy tych wskaźników. Celem niniejszego badania jest dokonanie przeglądu narzędzi badawczych używanych do pomiaru zadowolenia i frustracji podstawowych potrzeb psychicznych w miejscu pracy w ramach SDT. Aby osiągnąć ten cel, przeprowadzono przegląd literatury naukowej dostępnej w bazach EBSCOhost: APA PsycInfo, APA PsycArticles na słowa kluczowe „podstawowe potrzeby psychiczne” ORAZ „teoria samodeterminacji” ORAZ „skala”, a także przegląd narzędzi badawczych dostępnych na stronie internetowej Centrum Teorii Samodeterminacji. Zgromadzoną kolekcję uzupełniono przy użyciu metody kuli śnieżnej. W efekcie ustalono kompleksowy i aktualny przegląd narzędzi służących do pomiaru zadowolenia (i frustracji) podstawowych potrzeb psychologicznych w miejscu pracy w ramach SDT.
Bandura A. (1977), Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change, Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
Bartholomew K. J., Ntoumanis N., Ryan R. M., Thøgersen-Ntoumani C. (2011a), Psychological need thwarting in the sport context: Assessing the darker side of athletic experience, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 33(1), 75–102, https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.33.1.75.
Bartholomew K. J., Ntoumanis N., Ryan R. M., Bosch J. A., Thøgersen-Ntoumani C. (2011b), Self-determination theory and diminished functioning: The role of interpersonal control and psychological need thwarting, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(11), 1459–1473, https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211413125.
Baumeister R. F., Leary M. R. (1995), The need to belong: Desire for interpersonalattachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.
Chen B., Vansteenkiste M., Beyers W., Boone L., Deci E. L., Van der Kaap-Deeder J., Duriez B., Lens W., Matos L., Mouratidis A., Ryan R. M., Sheldon K. M., Soenens B., Van Petegem S., Verstuyf J. (2015), Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures, Motivation and Emotion, 39(2), 216–236, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1.
Cordeiro P., Paixão P., Lens W., Lacante M., Sheldon K. (2016), Factor structure and dimensionality of the balanced measure of psychological needs among Portuguese high school students. Relations to well-being and ill-being, Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 51–60, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.010.
de Charmes R. (2013), Personal Causation: The Internal Affective Determinants of Behavior, Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315825632.
Deci E. L., Koestner R., Ryan R. M. (1999), A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation, Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627.
Deci E. L., Olafsen A. H., Ryan R. M. (2017), Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 19–43, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108.
Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. (1980), The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 39–80, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60130-6.
Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. (1995), Human autonomy [in:] M. H. Kernis (ed.), Efficacy, Agency, and Self-Esteem (31–49), Springer US, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1280-0_3.
Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. (2000), The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior, Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268, https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
Deci E. L., Ryan R. M., Gagné M., Leone D. R., Usunov J., Kornazheva B. P. (2001), Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former eastern bloc country: A cross-cultural study of self-determination, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(8), 930–942, https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201278002.
Gagné M. (2003), The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement, Motivation and Emotion, 27(3), 199–223, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025007614869.
Gagné M. (ed.), (2014), The Oxford Handbook of Work Engagement, Motivation, and Self-Determination Theory, Oxford University Press.
Greguras G. J., Diefendorff J. M. (2009), Different fits satisfy different needs: Linking person-environment fit to employee commitment and performance using self-determination theory, Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 465–477, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014068.
Hinkin T. R. (1998), A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires, Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104–121, https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100106.
Hull C. L. (1943), Principles of Behavior: An Introduction to Behavior Theory, Appleton-Century-Crofts. Ilardi B. C., Leone D., Kasser T., Ryan R.M. (1993), Employee and supervisor ratings of motivation: Main effects and discrepancies associated with job satisfaction and adjustment in a factory setting, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(21), 1789–1805, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01066.x.
Kasser T., Davey J., Ryan R. M. (1992), Motivation and employee-supervisor discrepancies in a psychiatric vocational rehabilitation setting, Rehabilitation Psychology, 37(3), 175–188, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079104.
Martinent G., Guillet-Descas E., Moiret S. (2015), Reliability and validity evidence for the French Psychological Need Thwarting Scale (PNTS) scores: Significance of a distinction between thwarting and satisfaction of basic psychological needs, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 20, 29–39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.04.005.
Maslow A. H. (1943), A theory of human motivation, Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346.
McClelland D. C. (1965), N achievement and entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(4), 389–392, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021956.
Murray H. A. (1938), Explorations in Personality, Oxford University Press.
Olafsen A. H., Deci E. L. (2020), Self-determination theory and its relation to organizations [in:] A. H. Olafsen, E. L. Deci, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology, Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.112.
Olafsen A. H., Halvari H. (2017), Motivational mechanisms in the relation between job characteristics and employee functioning, The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 20, E38, https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2017.34.
Olafsen A. H., Halvari H., Forest J., Deci E. L. (2015), Show them the money? The role of pay, managerial need support, and justice in a self-determination theory model of intrinsic work motivation, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56(4), 447–457, https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12211.
Olafsen A. H., Halvari H., Frølund C. W. (2021), The basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration at work scale: A validation study, Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 2708, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697306.
Olafsen A. H., Niemiec C. P., Halvari H., Deci E.L., Williams G. C. (2017), On the dark side of work: A longitudinal analysis using self-determination theory, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(2), 275–285, https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1257611.
Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. (2000), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67, https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
Schultz P. P., Ryan R. M., Niemiec C. P., Legate N., Williams G. C. (2015), Mindfulness, work climate, and psychological need satisfaction in employee well-being, Mindfulness, 6(5), 971–985, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-014-0338-7.
Sheldon K. M., Kasser T. (1998), Pursuing personal goals: Skills enable progress, but not all progress is beneficial, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(12), 1319–1331, https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672982412006.
Tafvelin S., Stenling A. (2018), Development and initial validation of the need satisfaction and need support at work scales: A validity-focused approach, Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 3(1), 1, https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.30.
Van den Broeck A., Ferris D. L., Chang C.-H., Rosen C. C. (2016), A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work, Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195–1229, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316632058.
Van den Broeck A., Sulea C., Vander Elst T., Fischmann G., Iliescu D., De Witte H. (2014), The mediating role of psychological needs in the relation between qualitative job insecurity and counterproductive work behavior, Career Development International, 19(5), 526–547, https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-05-2013-0063.
Van den Broeck A., Vansteenkiste M., Witte H., Soenens B., Lens W. (2010), Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the Work-related Basic Need Satisfaction Scale, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 981–1002, https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X481382.
Van der Kaap-Deeder J., Soenens B., Ryan R., Vansteenkiste M. (2020), Manual of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (BPNSFS), https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/questionnaires/.
Vansteenkiste M., Ryan R. M. (2013), On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle, Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23(3), 263–280, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032359.
Vansteenkiste M., Ryan R. M., Soenens B. (2020), Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions, Motivation and Emotion, 44(1), 1–31, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09818-1.
Informacje: Zarządzanie Publiczne, 2021, Numer 4 (56), s. 183 - 193
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Measuring the satisfaction and frustration of basic psychological needs in the workplace
Measuring the satisfaction and frustration of basic psychological needs in the workplace
Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, Polska, ul. Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
AngielskiLiczba wyświetleń: 503
Liczba pobrań: 440