cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEData publikacji: 2022
Zarządzanie Mediami, 2022, Tom 10, Numer 2, s. 119 - 133
https://doi.org/10.4467/23540214ZM.22.009.17166Autorzy
Monitoring of Online Audience. Previous Practices of Public Museums in Poland
A crisis situation – which the COVID-19 pandemic undoubtedly is – becomes an opportunity to shift the perspective and propose or even enforce new management solutions. The intensification of museum activities in the virtual world forces the need to ask again questions about audience segmentation, motivation and interaction (Noehrer et al. 2021). Although public cultural institutions (including museums) see the need for conducting audience research, in practice, they focus on counting attendance (Ćwikła et al. 2020). In addition, they are focusing on recipients visiting the buildings of the institution. Therefore, this article aims to answer the question of whether public museums in Poland monitor attendance during online events, on social media and on the website, and if so, what data are taken into account? Based on the interviews and questionnaires, I also tried to find out what are the difficulties in counting audience online. Finally, I make recommendations, including the need to create a measurement system in which different weights will be assigned to different types of audience engagement, including “active” indicators.
Agostino D., Arnaboldi M. (2016). „A Measurement Framework for Assessing the Contribution of Social Media to Public Engagement. An Empirical Analysis on Facebook”. Public Management Review, 18(9), s. 1289–1307.
Agostino D., Arnaboldi M., Lampis A. (2020). „Italian State Museums during the COVID-19 Crisis: From Onsite Closure to Online Openness”. Musuem Management and Curatorship, 35(4), s. 362–372.
Barry J.M., Graca S.S. (2018). Humor Effectiveness in Social Video Engagement. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 26(1–2), s. 158–180. DOI: 10.1080/10696679.2017.1389247.
Beer D., Burrows R. (2007). „Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some Initial Considerations”. Sociological Research Online, 12(5), s. 67–79.
Bielaszka K., Dąbrowska M., Hydzik R., Łabaj D., Picheta M. (2021). Zmiana kultury a kultura zmiany. Nowe sposoby funkcjonowania instytucji w czasie pandemii. Wrocław: Strefa Kultury.
Burke V., Jorgensen D., Jorgensen F.A. (2020). „Museums at Home: Digital Initiatives in Response to COVID-19”. Norsk museumstidsskrift, 6(2), s. 117–123. https://www.idunn.no/norsk_museumstidsskrift/
2020/02/museums_at_home_digital_initiatives_in_response_to_covid-19.
Czyżewski K., Fogler J., Gałązka A., Hausner J., Machnowska-Góra A., Miłoszewska M. et al. (2020). Alert Kultura. Warszawa–Kraków: Fundacja GAP, Open Eyes Economy Summit. https://oees.pl/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Alert-Kultura-4.pdf.
Ćwikła M., Konior A., Laberschek M., Murzyn M., Pluszyńska A., Szostak A. (2020). Badania o badaniach. Czy i jak instytucje kultury pozyskują wiedzę o sobie i swoim otoczeniu. Kraków: Instytut Badań Organizacji Kultury.
Drabczyk M., Janus A., Sanetra-Szeliga J., Strycharz J. (2020). Pandemia w kulturze. Szansa na pozytywną zmianę? Warszawa: Open Eyes Economy Summit.
Fatyga B. (n.d.). Słownik Teorii i Metodologii Badań Kultury. Termin „Frekwencja”. Obserwatorium żywej kultury – sieć badawcza. http://ozkultura.pl/node/75.
Finnis J., Kennedy A. (n.d.). The Digital Transformation Agenda and GLAMs: A Quick Scan Report for Europeana. https://pro.europeana.eu/post/the-digitaltransformation-agenda-and-glams-culture24-findings-and-outcomes.
Gerlitz C., Helmond A. (2013). „The Like Economy: Social Buttons and the Data-Intensive Web”. New Media & Society, 15(8), s. 1348–1365.
Grincheva N. (2017). „Museum Ethnography in the Digital Age: Ethical Considerations”. W: M. Zimmer, K. Kinder-Kurlanda (eds.). Internet Research Ethics for the Social Age: New Challenges, Cases, and Contexts. New York et al.: Peter Lang.
Grincheva N. (2018). „Researching Online Museums: Digital Methods to Study Virtual Visitors”. W: L. Levenberg, T. Neilson, D. Rheams (eds.), Research Methods for the Digital Humanities. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hebrang G.I. (2013). „Croatian School Libraries on Facebook: Meeting the Needs of Young Library Users”. New Library World, 114(9/10), s. 416–427.
ICOM (2020). Museums, museum professionals and COVID-19. https://icom.museum/wpcontent/uploads/2020/05/ReportMuseums-and-COVID-19.pdf.
Khan G.F. (2015). Seven Layers of Social Media Analytics: Mining Business Insights from Social Media Text, Actions, Networks, Hyperlinks, Apps, Search Engine, and Location Data. CreateSpace.
Krajewski M. (2013). „W kierunku relacyjnej koncepcji uczestnictwa w kulturze”. Kultura i Społeczeństwo, 1, s. 29–67. https://doi.org/10.2478/kultura-2013-0003.
Kruczek Z. (2016). „Frekwencja w polskich atrakcjach turystycznych. Problemy oceny liczby odwiedzających”. Ekonomiczne Problemy Turystyki, 3(35), s. 25–35.
Lee D., Hosanagar K., Nair H.S. (2018). „Advertising Content and Consumer Engagement on Social Media: Evidence from Facebook”. Management Science, 64(11): 5105–5131.
Mergel I. (2013). „A Framework for Interpreting Social Media Interactions in the Public Sector”. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), s. 327–334.
Noehrer L., Gilmore A., Jay C., Yehudi Y. (2021). „The Impact of COVID-19 on Digital Data Practices in Museums and Art Galleries in the UK and the US”. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 8: 236.
O’Hagan L. (2021). „Instagram as an Exhibition Space: Reflections on Digital Remediation in the Time of COVID-19”. Museum Management and Curatorship, 36(6), s. 610–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2021.2001362.
Perreault M.C., Mosconi E. (2018). „Social Media Engagement: Content Strategy and Metrics Research Opportunities”. Paper presented at the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Reilly A.H., Hynan K.A. (2014). „Corporate Communication, Sustainability, and Social Media: It’s Not Easy (Really) Being Green”. Business Horizons, 57(6), s. 747–758.
Rivero P., Navarro-Neri I., Garcia-Ceballos S. (2020). „Spanish Archaeological Museums during COVID-19: An Edu-Communicative Analysis of Their Activity on Twitter through the Sustainable Development Goals”. Sustainable, 12(19): 8224.
Ryder B., Zhang T., Hua N. (2021). „The Social Media “Magic”: Virtually Engaging Visitors during COVID-19 Temporary Closures”. Administrative Sciences, 11(2): 53.
Sabate F., Berbegal-Mirabent J., Canabate A., Lebherz Ph.R. (2014). „Factors Influencing Popularity of Branded Content in Facebook Fan Pages”. European Management Journal, 32(6): 1001–1011.
Treem J., Dailey S.L., Pierce C.S., Biffl D. (2016). „What We Are Talking About When We Talk About Social Media: A Framework for Study”. Sociology Compass, 10(9), s. 768–784.
UNESCO (2020). Museums around the World in the Face of COVID-19. Report. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373530.
Zbuchea A., Romanelli M., Bira M. (2020). „Museums during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Focus on Romania and Italy”. Stretegica. Preparing for Tomorrow, Today. International Academic Conference, s. 680–705.
Informacje: Zarządzanie Mediami, 2022, Tom 10, Numer 2, s. 119 - 133
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Monitoring of Online Audience. Previous Practices of Public Museums in Poland
Instytut Kultury Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
ul. prof. Stanisława Łojasiewicza 4, 30-348 Kraków, Polska
Publikacja: 2022
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
PolskiLiczba wyświetleń: 799
Liczba pobrań: 412