FAQ

Teoria Polityki

Logotyp Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego

Neoclassical Realism and Foreign Policy Analysis – A Possible Way of Integration?

Data publikacji: 2019

Teoria Polityki, 2019, Nr 3/2019, s. 201 - 227

https://doi.org/10.4467/25440845TP.19.011.10294

Autorzy

Magdalena Kozub-Karkut
Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, Polska, ul. Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9369-6876 Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Abstrakt

The main goal of the article is to discuss whether neoclassical realism (NCR), described as the most recent realist research programme might be perceived as a fruitful way of integrating IR theory with the assumptions of foreign policy analysis (FPA). Consequently, the research question that has to be answered, is whether the NCR has succeeded as a new research programme developed as an attempt to give the Waltzian theory more explanatory power. The article starts with a critical analysis of the main assumptions of the NCR, after which it focuses on FPA defined as a subdiscipline of IR. The third part of the text draws the attention to the neoclassical realism’s integration of ‘intervening variables’ that bring FPA insights into the realist theoretical paradigm. It is argued that apart from numerous theoretical flaws, there is still a possible way to develop its theoretical depth through careful borrowing from FPA.  

Bibliografia

Allison, G.T., Halperin, M.H. (1972). Bureaucratic Politics: A Paradigm and Some Policy Implications. World Politics, 24 (Supplement), pp. 40–79.

Berlin, I. (1953). The Hedgehog and the Fox: An Essay on Tolstoys View of History. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

Bieleń, S. (2010). Polish Foreign Policy after Joining the NATO and the EU: Problems of Identity and Adaptation. Warsaw: Difin.

Breslauer, G., Tetlock, P.E. (1991). Learning in US and Soviet Foreign Policy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Carlsnaes W. (2002). Foreign Policy. In: W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, B. Simmons (eds.). Handbook of International Relations. London: Sage.

Christiansen, Th.J. (1996). Useful Adversaries. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.

Christiansen, Th.J. (1997). Progressive Research on Degenerate Alliances. The American Political Science Review, 91(4), pp. 919–926.

Cohen, B.C., Harris, S.A. (1975). Foreign Policy. In: F.I. Greenstein, N.W. Polsby (eds.). Handbook of Political Science. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Desch, M.C. (1999). Civilian Control of the Military. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Dunne, T., Hansen, L., Wight, C. (2013). The End of International Relations Theory?. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), pp. 402–425.

Edelstein, D.M. (2002). Managing Uncertainty: Beliefs about Intentions and the Rise of Great Powers. Security Studies, 12(1), pp. 1–40.

Flanik, W. (2011). Bringing FPA Back Home: Cognition, Constructivism, and Conceptual Metaphor.Foreign Policy Analysis, 7(4), pp. 361–447.

Fordham, B.O. (2009). The Limits of Neoclassical Realism: Additive and  Interactive Approaches to Explaining Foreign Policy Preferences. In: S.E. Lobell, N.M. Ripsman, J.W. Taliaferro (eds.). Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Foulon, M. (2015). Neoclassical Realism: Challengers and Bridging Identities. International Studies Review, 17(4), pp. 635–661.

Freyberg-Inan,  A.,  Harrison,  E.,  James,  P.  (2009).  Conclusion:  Ways  Forward. In: A. Freyberg-Inan, E. Harrison, P. James (eds.). Rethinking Realism in International Relations. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Friedberg, A.L. (2000). In the Shadow of the Garrison State. New York: Princeton University Press.

Goldgeier, J.M. (1997). Psychology and Security. Security Studies, 4(6), pp. 137–166.

Goldgeier, J.M., Tetlock Ph. E. (2000). Human Nature and World Politics: Cognition, Identity, and Influence. International Journal of Psychology, 35(2), pp. 87–96.

Goldgeier, J.M., Tetlock Ph. E. (2001). Psychology and International Relations Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, pp. 67–92.

Guzzini, S. (2004). The Enduring Dilemmas of Realism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations and Development, 10(1), pp. 533–568.

Hagan, J.D. (1993). Political Opposition and Foreign Policy in Comparative Perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Haliżak, E. (2018). On the Essence of Foreign Policy Analysis. In: E. Haliżak (ed.).Research in Foreign Policy. Warsaw: Rambler.

Haliżak, E. (ed.) (2018). Foreign Policy Analysis. Warsaw: Rambler.

Halperin, M.H., Kanter, A. (1973). Readings in American Foreign Policy: A Bureaucratic Perspective. Boston, MA: Little Brown.

Hellmann, G., Jørgensen, K.E. (2016). Theorizing Foreign Policy in a Globalized World. New York: Palgrave.

Herman, M.G. (1970). Explaining Foreign Policy Behaviour Using the Personal Characteristics of Political Leaders. International Studies Quarterly, 24(1), pp. 7–46.

Herman, M.G. (1978). Effects of Personal Characteristics of Leaders on Foreign Policy. In: M.A. East, S.A. Salmore, C.F. Herman (eds.). Why Nations Act. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Herman, M.G., Kegley, C.W. (1994). Rethinking Democracy and International Peace. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York, 1-4 September.

Houghton, D.P. (2007). Reinvigorating the Study of Foreign Policy Decision Making: Toward a Constructivist Approach. Foreign Policy Analysis, 3(1), pp. 24–45.

Hudson, V.M. (2005). Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground ofInternational Relations: Foreign Policy Analysis. Foreign Policy  Analysis, 1(1), pp. 1–30.

Hudson, V.M. (2007, 2014). Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.

Hudson,  V.M.  (2016).  The  History  and  Evolution  of  Foreign  Policy  Analysis.  In: S. Smith, A. Hadfield, T. Dunne (eds.). Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Janis, I.L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascos. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Jervis, R. (2005). American Foreign Policy in a New Era. London: Routledge.

Kaarbo, J. (1993). Power and Influence in Foreign Policy Decision-Making: The Role of Junior Parties in Coalition Cabinets in Comparative Perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Acapulco, Mexico, 23-27 March.

Kaarbo, J. (2015). A Foreign Policy Analysis Perspective on the Domestic Politics Turn in IR Theory. International Studies Review, 17(2), pp. 189–216.

Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), pp. 263–291.

Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, Values and Frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), pp. 341–350.

Katzenstein, P.J., Sil, R. (2010). Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics: Reconfiguring Problems and Mechanisms across Research Traditions. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), pp. 411–431.

Kirshner, J. (2010). The Tragedy of Offensive Realism: Classical Realism and the Rise of China. European Journal of International Relations, 18(1), pp. 53–75.

Korany, B. (ed.) (1986). How Foreign Policy Decisions Are Made in the Third World. Boulder, CO: Westview.

Kostecki, W. (1988). Foreign Policy: Theoretical Framework. Warsaw: PWN.

Kuźniar, R. (2018). Book Review Research in Foreign Policy ed. by E. Haliżak.International Affairs, 2, pp. 177–188.

Legro, J.W., Moravcsik, A. (1999). Is Anybody Still a Realist. International Security, 24(2), pp. 5–55.

Lobell, S., Norrin, E., Ripsman, M., Taliaferro, J.W. (2009). Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Łoś-Nowak, T. (2000). International Relations. Wroclaw: Wroclaw University Press.

McGowan, P., Shapiro, H.B. (1973). The Comparative Study of Foreign Policy: A Survey of Scientific Findings. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Mearsheimer, J.J., Walt, St. M. (2013). Leaving Theory Behind: Why Simplistic Hypothesis Testing Is Bad for International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), pp. 427–457.

Monten, J. (2005). The Roots of the Bush Doctrine: Power, Nationalism and Democracy Promotion in US Strategy. International Security, 29(4), pp. 112–156.

Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Relations. International Organization, 51(4), pp. 513–553.

Mouritzen, H., Wivel, A. (eds.) (2005). The Geopolitics of Euro-Atlantic Integration. London–New York: Routledge.

Narizny, K. (2017). On Systemic Paradigm and Domestic Politics. Security Studies, 42(2), pp. 155–190.

Neack, J., Hey, J., Haney P. (eds.) (1995). Foreign Policy Analysis: Continuity and Change in Its Second Generation. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Pałyga, E.S., Symonides, J. (1978). Theoretical Problems of Foreign Policy. Warsaw: IGKR SGPiS.

Parzymies, S., Popiuk-Rysińska, I. (2012). Polands Participation in International Organizations. Warsaw: Scholar.

Pietraś, M. (2018). “Foreign Policy Analysis and International Relations. In: E. Haliżak (ed.). Research in Foreign Policy. Warsaw: Rambler.

Pietraś, Z.J. (1998). Decydowanie polityczne. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Pugacewicz, T. (2017). Theories of Foreign Policy: American Foreign Policy Analysis Perspective. Cracow: Jagiellonian University Press.

Putnam, R. (1988). Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization, 42(3), pp. 427–460.

Rathburn, B. (2008). A Rose by Any Other Name: Neoclassical Realism as the Logical and Necessary Extension of Structural Realism. Security Studies, 17(2), pp. 294–321.

Rose, G. (1998). Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics, 51(1), pp. 144–172.

Rosenau, J.N. (1966). Pre-theories and Theories of Foreign Policy. In: B.R. Farrel (ed.).Approaches to Comparative and International Politics. Evanston: Northwestern Polity Press.

Rosenau, J.N. (1974). Comparing Foreign Policies: Theories, Findings, and Methods. New York: John Wiley.

Rynning, S., Guzzini, S. (2001). Realism and Foreign Policy Analysis. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Peace Research Institute, COPRI Working Papers 42.

Schweller, R. (1997). New Realist Research on Alliances: Refining, Not Refuting. The American Political Science Review, 91(4), pp. 927–930.

Schweller, R. (1998). Deadly Imbalances. New York: Columbia University Press.

Schweller, R. (2003). The Progressiveness of Neoclassical Realism. In: C. Elman, M.F. Elman (eds.). Progress in International Relations Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schweller, R. (2004). Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of  Under-balancing. International Security, 29(2), pp. 159–201.

Semmel, A.K., Minix, D. (1979). Small Group Dynamics and Foreign Policy Decision-Making: An Experimental Approach. In: L.S. Falkowski (ed.). Psychological Models in International Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Skidmore, D., Hudson, V.M. (1993). The Limits of State Autonomy: Societal Groups and Foreign Policy Formulation. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Smith, S. (1986). Theories of Foreign Policy: An Historical Overview. Review of International Studies, 12(1), pp. 13–29.

Smith, S. (2012). Theories of Foreign Policy: An Historical Overview. In: W. Carlsnaes (ed.). Foreign Analysis, Vol. I–V. London: Sage, pp. 3–25.

Snyder, J. (1991). Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Snyder, G. (2002). “Mearsheimers World Offensive Realism and the Struggle for Security. International Security, 27(1), pp. 149–173.

Snyder, R.C., Bruck, H.W., Sapin, B. (2002). Decision-Making as an Approach to the Study of International Politics. Princeton–New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Sprout, H., Sprout, M. (1956). Man-Milieu Relationship Hypotheses in the Context of International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Taliaferro, J.W. (2006). State Building for Future Wars: Neoclassical Realism and the Resource-Extractive State. Security Studies, 15(3), pp. 464–495.

Tetlock, P.E. (1979). Identifying Victims of Groupthink from Public Statements of Decision Makers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), pp. 1314–1324.

Vasquez, J.A. (1997). The Realist Paradigm and Degenerative versus Progressive Research Programs: An Appraisal of Neotraditional Research on Waltz Balancing Proposition. American Political Science Review, 91(4), pp. 899–912.

Wæver, O. (2009). Waltzs Theory of Theory. International Relations, 23(2), pp. 201–222.

Walt, St. M. (1985). Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power. International Security, 9(4), pp. 3–43.

Walt, St.M. (1987). The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Walt, St.M. (1997). The Progressive Power of Realism. The American Political Science Review, 91(4), pp. 931–935.

Walt, St.M. (2002). Revolution and War. World Politics, 44(3), pp. 321–368.

Walt, St.M. (2002). The Enduring Relevance of the Realist Tradition. In: I. Katznelson, H.V. Milner (eds.). Political Science: The State of the Discipline.  New York: W.W. Norton.

Waltz, K.N. (1979, 2010). Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Waltz, K.N. (1986). Reflections on Theory of International Politics: A Response to My Critics. In: R.O Keohane (ed.). Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.

Waltz, K.N. (1996). “International Politics Is Not Foreign Policy. Security Studies, 6(1), pp. 54–57.

Wivel, A. (2005). Explaining Why State X Made a Certain Move Last Tuesday: The Promise and Limitations of Realist Foreign Policy Analysis. Journal of International Relations and Development, 8(4), pp. 355–380.

Wohlforth, W.C. (1993). The Elusive Balance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Wohlforth, W.C. (2012). Realism and Foreign Policy. In: S. Smith, A. Hadfield, T. Dunne (eds.). Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zakaria, F. (1998). From Wealth to Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Informacje

Informacje: Teoria Polityki, 2019, s. 201 - 227

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Angielski:

Neoclassical Realism and Foreign Policy Analysis – A Possible Way of Integration?

Autorzy

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9369-6876

Magdalena Kozub-Karkut
Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, Polska, ul. Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9369-6876 Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, Polska, ul. Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków

Publikacja: 2019

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND  ikona licencji

Udział procentowy autorów:

Magdalena Kozub-Karkut (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Angielski

Liczba wyświetleń: 3483

Liczba pobrań: 1781