Skala Experience in Close Relationships-Revised: Struktura, rzetelność oraz skrócona wersja skali w polskiej próbie

Katarzyna  Lubiewska; Karolina  Głogowska; Kinga  Mickiewicz; Ewa  Wojtynkiewicz; Paweł  Izdebski; Cezary Wiśniewski

Tytuły

Abstrakt

The Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised questionnaire: factorial structure, reliability and a short version of the scale in a Polish sample

The Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised is one of the most popular self-report instruments assessing adult attachment in the sphere of avoidance and anxiety. Although the scale is used in Poland, its psychometric properties are not sufficiently documented. In the study, we set out to: estimate the psychometric properties of the scale, controlling for the common method variance (method bias); and introduce a short version of the scale. The sample was composed of 781 adults between the age of 16 and 81. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis supported two-factorial ECR-R structure indicating problems with low factor loadings, which deteriorated even more after controlling for the common method variance. On the basis of the content of the items and their psychometric properties we proposed a short 16-item form of the ECR-R scale which revealed a good model fit and factor loadings. However, the effects of the common method variance on factor loadings and the avoidance-anxiety relation were found to be substantial. The results revealed that the relation between avoidance and anxiety was due to the shared method variance and not to the attachment itself. The issues concerning the construction of attachment self-report scales are discussed along with practical implications for the further use of the ECR-R scale in Poland, named as the DBZ-R (36-items) or the DBZ-RS (the short version).

Słowa kluczowe

przywiązanie, bliskie związki, psychometria, konfirmacyjna analiza czynnikowa, wspólna wariancja metody

attachment, close relationships, psychometrics, confirmatory factor analysis, common method variance

Bibliografia

Ainsworth M.D.S., Blehar M., Waters E., Wall S. (1978), Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Anatchkova M.D., Ware J.E., Bjorner J.B. (2011), Assessing the factor structure of a role functioning item bank. Quality of Life Research, 20, 745–758.

Bowlby J. (1973), Separation: Anxiety, and Anger. Attachment and Loss, vol. 2. New York: Basic.

Brennan K.A., Clark C.L., Shaver P. (1998), Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. W: J.A. Simpson, W.S. Rholes (eds.), Attachment Theory and Close Relationships, 46–76. New York: The Guilford Press.

Browne M.W., Cudeck R. (1993), Alternative ways of assessing model fit. W: K.A. Bollen, J.S. Long (eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models, 136–162. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Byrne M.B., van de Vijver F.J.R. (2010), Testing for measurement and structural equivalence in large-scale cross-cultural studies: Addressing the issue of nonequivalence. International Journal of Testing, 10, 107–132.

Cheung G.W., Rensvold R.B. (2002), Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 531–542.

Esbjorn B.H., Breinholst S., Niclasen J., Skovgaard L.F., Lange K., Reinholdt-Dunne M.L. (2015), Identifying the best-fitting factor structure of the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised in a Scandinavian example. PLoS ONE, 10(9), e0137218.

Fairchild A.J., Finney S.J. (2006), Investigating validity evidence for the Experiences in Close Relationships-
-Revised questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 116–135.

Fraley R.C. (2015), Information on the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-R) Adult Attachment Questionnaire. http://internal.psychology.illinois.edu/~rcfraley/measures/ecrr.htm (dostęp: 2.03.2015).

Fraley R.C., Waller N.G., Brennan K.A. (2000), An item-response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365.

George C., Kaplan N., Main M. (1985), The Adult Attachment Interview. Unpublished manuscript, University of California at Berkeley. http://www.psychology.sunysb.edu/attachment/measures/content/aai_interview.pdf (dostęp: 12.05.2013).

Hazan C., Shaver P. (1987), Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.

Hu L.-T., Bentler P.M. (1999), Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

Johnson R.E., Rosen C.C., Djurdjevic E. (2011), Assessing the impact of common method variance on higher order multidimensional constructs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 744–761.

Kline R.B. (2005), Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd. New York: The Guilford Press.

Kooiman C.G., Klaassens E.R., van Heloma Lugt J.Q., Kamperman A.M. (2013), Psychometrics and validity of the duch experiences in Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-r) in an outpatient mental health sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 217–224.

Lindwall M., Barkoukis V., Crano C., Lucidi F., Raudsepp L., Liukkonen J., Thogersen-Ntoumani C. (2012), Method effects: The problem with negatively versus positively keyd items. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 196–204.

Lubiewska K., Głogowska K., Mickiewicz K., Wojtynkiewicz E., Wiśniewski C., Izdebski P. (w druku), Ekwiwalencja pomiarowa skali Experience in Close Relationships-Revised w grupach zróżnicowanych pod względem wieku oraz płci badanych.

Marsh H.W., Scalas L.F., Nagengast B. (2010), Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteeme Scale: Traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles. Psychological Assessment, 22, 366–381.

Mikulincer M., Shaver P.R. (2007), Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Noftle E.E., Shaver P.R. (2006), Attachment dimensions and the big five personality traits: Associations and comparative ability to predict relationship quality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 179–208.

R Core Team (2014), R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. http://cran.r-project.org (dostęp: 10.05.2015).

Ravitz P., Maunder R., Hunter J., Sthankiya B., Lancee W. (2010), Adult attachment measures: A 25-year review. Journal of Psychometric Research, 69, 419–432.

Revelle W. (2011), Package ‘psych’. http://www.personality-project.org/r (dostęp: 15.05.2015).

Rosseel Y. (2012), lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/ (dostęp: 05.05.2015).

Rotaru T.-S., Rusu A. (2013), Psychometric properties of the Romanian version of the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised questionnaire (ECR-R). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 51–55.

Satorra A., Bentler P.M. (1994), Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. W: A. von Eye, C.C. Clogg (eds.), Latent Variables Analysis: Applications to Developmental Research, 399–419. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Sibley C.G., Fischer R., Liu J.H. (2005), Reliability and validity of the revised Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR-R) self-report measure of adult romantic attachment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1524–1536.

Shaver P.R., Mikulincer M. (2007), Podejście behawiorystyczne do miłości romantycznej. Systemy: Przywiązania, opieki i seksualny. W: R.J. Sternberg, K. Weis (red.), Nowa psychologia miłości, 30–59. Taszów: Biblioteka Moderatora.

Shrout P.E., Bolger N. (2002), Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.

Tsagarakis M., Kafetsios K., Stalikas, A. (2007), European Journal of Psychological Assessmnet, 23, 47–55.

van IJzendoorn M.H., Sagi-Schwartz A. (2008), Cross-cultural patterns of attachment. Universal and contextual dimensions. W: J. Cassidy, P.R. Shaver (eds.), Handbook of Attachment. Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications, 880–905. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Wongpakaran T., Wongpakaran N., Wannarit K. (2011), Validity and reliability of Thai version of the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised questionnaire. Singapore Medicine Journal, 52, 100–106.

Wei M., Russell D.W., Mallinckrodt B., Vogel D.L. (2007), The Experience in Close Relationship Scale (ECR)-
-Short Form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 187–204.

Widaman K.F., Little T.D., Preacher K.J., Sawalani G.M. (2011), On creating and using short forms of scales in secondary research. W: K.H. Trzesniewski, M.B. Donnellan, R.E. Lucas (eds.), Secondary Data Analysis: An Introduction for Psychologists, 39–61. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Informacje

Informacje: Psychologia Rozwojowa, 2016, Tom 21, Numer 1, s. 49 - 63

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/20843879PR.16.004.4793

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:

Skala Experience in Close Relationships-Revised: Struktura, rzetelność oraz skrócona wersja skali w polskiej próbie

Angielski:

The Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised questionnaire: factorial structure, reliability and a short version of the scale in a Polish sample