FAQ
logotyp Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego

Funkcje wykonawcze u dzieci – dysonans między obserwacją dorosłego a umiejętnościami dziecka

Data publikacji: 2022

Psychologia Rozwojowa, 2022, Tom 27, Numer 2, s. 89 - 98

https://doi.org/10.4467/20843879PR.22.013.17470

Autorzy

Natalia Józefacka
Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
, Polska
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1674-3760 Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Tytuły

Funkcje wykonawcze u dzieci – dysonans między obserwacją dorosłego a umiejętnościami dziecka

Abstrakt

Executive Functions in Children – Dissonance between Adult Observation and Child’s Skills

Introduction: Executive functions have been the subject of intensive research in recent years. Both questionnaire tools and experimental tasks are used to measure them. A review of the literature on the subject indicates a significant but weak relationship between these two methods of measurement. It is worth emphasizing that, in the case of children, questionnaire measurement is very prone to errors caused by differences between indirect observation by parents or teachers. Aim: The aim of this article is to increase the current knowledge of the relationship between questionnaire measures and experimental tasks. In particular, this study aims to investigate differences between the observations of parents and teachers in the assessment of working memory and inhibition in children. The relationship between experimental and questionnaire tasks is studied, and a hypothesis regarding a stronger relationship between these two methods of measurement using latent variables is verified. Study group: The study was conducted on a group of 200 children, aged 5–6, attending preschool or the first grade of primary school. Result: In the analyzed group, the differences between the answers of teachers and parents were significant, but the effect size was low. The relationship between the individual subscales was also moderate. The relationship between questionnaire measurements and experimental tasks in the study group has been confirmed by other studies. The correlation coefficient between parents’ and teachers’ assessments is significant and low, ranging from 0.19 to 0.30. Conclusions: In conclusion, the obtained results confirm the observations of other researchers: task-based and questionnaire-based measures evaluate different constructs. Questionnaires capture more global expressions of executive functions in different life contexts (home, school) over longer periods of time, while experimental tasks assess basic cognitive abilities in a more predictable and structured environment.

Bibliografia

Barkley R.A., Fischer M. (2011), Predicting impairment in major life activities and occupational functioning in hyperactive children as adults: Self-reported Executive Function (EF) deficits versus EF Tests. Developmental Neuropsychology, 36(2), 137–161. doi:10.1080/87565641.2010.549877.

Bodnar L.E., Prahme M.C., Cutting L.E., Denckla M.B., Mahone E.M. (2007), Construct validity of parent ratings of inhibitory control. Child Neuropsychology, 13(4), 345–362. doi:10.1080/09297040600899867.

Brunetti R, Del Gatto C, Delogu F. eCorsi: implementation and testing of the Corsi block-tapping task for digital tablets. Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 2;5:939. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00939.

Catale C., Lejeune C., Merbah S., Meulemans T. (2013), French adaptation of the Childhood Executive Functioning Inventory (CHEXI): Confirmatory factor analysis in a sample of young French-speaking Belgian children. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 149–155. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000141.

Claessen M.H., Ham I.J. van der, Zandvoort MJ. van (2015), Computerization of the standard corsi blocktapping task affects its underlying cognitive concepts: A pilot study. Appl Neuropsychol Adult., 22(3), 180–188. doi:10.1080/23279095.2014.892488.

Enkavi A.Z., Eisenberg I.W., Bissett P.G., Mazza G.L., MacKinnon D.P., Marsch L.A., Poldrack R.A. (2019), Large-scale analysis of test–retest reliabilities of self-regulation measures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(12), 5472–5477. doi:10.1073/pnas.1818430116.

Espy K.A. (1997), The Shape School: Assessing executive function in preschool children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 13(4), 495–499. doi:10.1080/87565649709540690.

Friedman N.P., Banich M.T. (2019), Questionnaires and task-based measures assess different aspects of self-regulation: Both are needed. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(49), 24396–24397. doi:10.1073/pnas.1915315116.

Gutierrez M., Arán Filippetti V., Lemos V. (2021), The Childhood Executive Functioning Inventory (CHEXI) parent and teacher form: Factor structure and cognitive correlates in spanish-speaking children from argentina. Developmental Neuropsychology, 46(2), 136–148. doi:10.1080/87565641.2021.1878175.

Kaczan R., Rycielski P., Rzenca K., Sijko K. (2014), Metody diagnozy na pierwszym etapie edukacyjnym. Podrȩcznik narzȩdzi diagnostycznych. Warszawa: Instytutu Badań Edukacyjnych.

Montgomery D., Koeltzow T. (2010), A review of the day-night task: The Stroop paradigm and interference control in young children. Developmental Review. 30. 308-330. 10.1016/j.dr.2010.07.001.

Sharma L., Markon K.E., Clark L.A. (2014), Toward a theory of distinct types of “impulsive” behaviors: A meta-analysis of self-report and behavioral measures. Psychological Bulletin, 140(2), 374–408. doi:10.1037/a0034418.

Simpson A., Riggs K. J. (2005), Inhibitory and working memory demands of the day-night task in children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23(3), 471–486. doi:10.1348/026151005X28712.

Tamm L., Peugh J. (2019), Concordance of teacher-rated and performance-based measures of executive functioning in preschoolers. Child Neuropsychology, 25(3), 410–424. doi:10.1080/09297049.2018.1484085.

Thorell L.B., Nyberg L. (2008), The Childhood Executive Functioning Inventory (CHEXI): A new rating instrument for parents and teachers. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33(4), 536–552. doi:10.1080/87565640802101516.

Toplak M.E., West R.F., Stanovich K.E. (2013), Practitioner review: Do performance-based measures and ratings of executive function assess the same construct? Performance-based and rating measures of EF. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(2), 131–143. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12001.

Informacje

Informacje: Psychologia Rozwojowa, 2022, Tom 27, Numer 2, s. 89 - 98

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:

Funkcje wykonawcze u dzieci – dysonans między obserwacją dorosłego a umiejętnościami dziecka

Angielski:

Executive Functions in Children – Dissonance between Adult Observation and Child’s Skills

Autorzy

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1674-3760

Natalia Józefacka
Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
, Polska
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1674-3760 Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
Polska

Publikacja: 2022

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: CC BY  ikona licencji

Udział procentowy autorów:

Natalia Józefacka (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Polski