Partycypacja społeczna w perspektywie geoprzestrzennej
Wybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEData publikacji: 2024
Prace Geograficzne, 2024, Zeszyt 175, s. 75-95
https://doi.org/10.4467/20833113PG.24.013.20954Autorzy
Participation from a geospatial perspective
Participation in societal processes and contributing to decisions are trademarks of an open and democratic society. Successful participation requires informed opinions, which in a majority of issues need orientation in and assessment of spatial context. Ongoing digitization of (not only) geospatial information has greatly increased the accessibility of spatial views, and at the same time facilitates the generation of personal location-centric views and communications. Access to geospatial technologies is the key driver for connecting individuals with the rich and diverse collection of spatial data services. These provide an indispensable context for opinions on issues centred on locations. Apart from this obvious and straightforward case for explicit geospatial enablement and support of participative processes, this paper presents a wider context and issues to be considered by designers of public participation. Drivers of geospatial participation are discussed from the technologies, competences, and policies perspectives, also considering the challenges of prevalent ‘nimby’ mindsets motivating intellectual shortcuts for some citizens participating in decision processes. In addition, the dominance of social media in public discourse simultaneously facilitates informed contributions as well as posing the risk of less informed mirroring of popular views with a predominantly negative attitude. The final section showcases recent sample elements from the author’s teaching experience dedicated to introducing citizen science for collaborative generation of knowledge and in turn using this as a backdrop for participation initiatives. With scientific evidence frequently ignored or confronted with pseudoscience and conspiracy theories, the foundations of today’s democracies based on representation and participation are clearly endangered.
Abler R., Adams J., Gould P., 1971, Spatial organization: the geographer’s view of the world, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Annoni A., Nativi S., Çöltekin A., Desha Ch., Eremchenko E., Gevaert C.M., Giuliani G., Chen M., Perez-Mora L., Strobl J., Tumampos S., 2023, Digital Earth: yesterday, today, and tomorrow, International Journal of Digital Earth, 16 (1), 1022–1072. DOI:10.1080/17538947.2023.2187467.
ArcGIS Living Atlas of the World, https://livingatlas.arcgis.com/en/home/ (10.09.2024).
ArcGIS Online, https://www.arcgis.com/home/index.html (10.09.2024).
basemap.at Austrian OGD basemap, https://basemap.at/en/ (10.09.2024).
Blanford J., Unwin D., Strobl J., 2021, Lockdown lessons: an international conversation on resilient GI science teaching, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 46 (1), 7–19. DOI:10.1080/03098265.2021.1986687.
Brouwer N.R., Trounstine J., 2024, NIMBYs, YIMBYs, and the politics of land use in American cities, Annual Review of Political Science, 27 (1), 165–184. DOI:10.1146/annurevpolisci-041322-041133.
Brovelli M.A., Minghini M., Zamboni G., 2014, Public Participation GIS: a FOSS architecture enabling field-data collection, International Journal of Digital Earth, 8 (5), 345–363. DOI:10.1080/17538947.2014.887150.
Brovelli M.A., Minghini M., Zamboni G., 2016, Public participation in GIS via mobile applications, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 114, 306–315. DOI:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.04.002.
Bröring A., Remke A., Lasnia D., 2012, SenseBox – a generic sensor platform for the Web of Things [in:] A. Puiatti, T. Gu (eds) Mobile and ubiquitous systems: computing, networking, and services, MobiQuitous 2011. Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, 104, 186–196, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-30973-1_16.
Coetzee S., Gould M., McCormack B., Sadiq Z., Scott G., Kmoch A., Alameh N., Strobl J., Wytzisk A., Devarajan T., 2021, Towards a sustainable geospatial ecosystem beyond SDIs: position paper for the 11th Session of The United Nations Global Geospatial Information Management (UN GGIM). DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.22555.39203.
ecas – European Citizen Action Service (undated), https://ecas.org/projects/digital-democracy/ (8.9.2024).
Elwood S., 2008, Volunteered geographic information: future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS, GeoJournal, 72, 173–183. DOI:10.1007/s10708-008-9186-0.
Elwood S., 2009, GIS: public participation [in:] R. Kitchin, N. Thrift (eds), International encyclopaedia of human geography, Elsevier, Oxford, 520–525.
EPA (undated), Public participation guide, https://www.epa.gov/international-cooperation/public-participation-guide-introduction-guide (9.09.2024).
Foody G.M., See L., Fritz S., Van der Velde M., Perger C., Schill C., Boyd D.S., 2013, Assessing the accuracy of volunteered geographic information arising from multiple contributors to an internet based collaborative project, Transactions in GIS, 17 (6), 847–860. DOI:10.1111/tgis.12033.
Goodchild M.F., 1992, Geographical Information Science, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 6 (1), 31–45. DOI:10.1080/02693799208901893.
Goodchild M. F., 2007, Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography, GeoJournal, 69, 211–221. DOI:10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y.
Gryl I., 2012, Reflexivity and geomedia – going beyond domain-specific competence development [in:] T. Jekel, A. Car, J. Strobl, G. Griesebner (eds), GI_Forum 2012: geovisualisation, society and learning, Herbert Wichmann Verlag, Berlin, Offenbach, 182–192.
Gryl I., Jekel T., Donert K., 2010, GeoInformation and spatial citizenship [in:] T. Jekel, A. Koller, K. Donert, R. Vogler (eds), Learning with geoinformation V – Lernen mit Geoinformation V, Herbert Wichmann Verlag, Berlin, Offenbach, 2–11.
Gryl I., Jekel T., 2012, Re-centering GI in secondary education: toward a spatial citizenship approach, Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 47 (1), 18–28. DOI: 3138/carto.47.1.18.
Gryl I., Schulze U., Kanwischer D., 2013, Spatial citizenship: the concept of competence [in:] T. Jekel, A. Car, J. Strobl, G. Griesebner (eds), GI_Forum 2013: creating the GISociety, Herbert Wichmann Verlag, Berlin, Offenbach, 282–293.
Guo H., Goodchild M., Annoni A. (eds), 2020, Manual of Digital Earth, Springer, Singapore. DOI:10.1007/978-981-32-9915-3.
Haklay M., Weber P., 2008, OpenStreetMap: user-generated street maps, IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7 (4), 12–18. DOI:10.1109/MPRV.2008.80.
Hennig S., Vogler R., 2011, Participatory tool development for participatory spatial planning – The GEOKOM-PEP Environment [in:] T. Jekel, A. Koller, K. Donert, R. Vogler (eds), Learning with GI 2011: implementing Digital Earth in education, Herbert Wichmann Verlag, Berlin, Offenbach 79–88.
Hennig S., Vogler R., 2016, User-centered map applications through participatory design: experiences gained during the ‘YouthMap 5020’ Project, The Cartographic Journal, 53 (3), 213–229. DOI:10.1080/00087041.2016.1148217.
Hennig S., Abad L., Hölbling D., Tiede, D., 2022, Citizen science and geomorphology: the citizenMorph pilot system for observing and reporting data on landforms, Environmental Research Letters, 17 (8), 085004. DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/ac8235.
Hennig S., Vogler R., Panek J., 2023, Survey123 for ArcGIS Online [in:] C.M Burnett, Evaluating participatory mapping software, Springer, Cham, 167–188. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-19594-5_8.
Hennig S., Vogler R., Schötz T., Strobl J., Imanalieva P., 2023, Towards more user-centered contributory citizen science initiatives: learning from the u3Green approach, International Journal of Geoinformatics, 19 (11), 26–37. DOI:10.52939/ijg.v19i11.2919.
Hummer P., Niedermeyer C., 2018, Don’t walk alone: synergy effects for citizen science created through adaptive platform design in SPOTTERON [in:] F. Heigl, D. Dörler, M. Ernst (eds), Austrian Citizen Science Conference 2018: abstract book, Frontiers Media SA, Salzburg, 66–69. DOI: 10.3389/978-2-88945-587-4.
Lemmens R., Antoniou V., Hummer P., Potsiou C., 2021, Citizen science in the digital world of apps [in:] K. Vohland K., A. Land-Zandstra, L. Ceccaroni, R. Lemmens, J. Perelló, M. Ponti, R. Samson, K. Wagenknecht (eds), The science of citizen science, Springer, Cham, 461–474. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_23.
Lin Y., Kant S., 2021, Using social media for citizen participation: contexts, empowerment, and inclusion, Sustainability, 13 (12), 6635. DOI:10.3390/su13126635.
van der Meer L., Sudmanns M., Augustin H., Baraldi A., Tiede D., 2022, Semantic querying in Earth observation data cubes, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLVIII-4/W1-2022, 503–510. DOI:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W1-2022-503-2022.
Nazarkulova A., Strobl J., 2023, Digital Earth competences across disciplines, International Journal of Geoinformatics, 19 (11), 20–25. DOI:10.52939/ijg.v19i11.2917.
Popper K.R., 2013, The open society and its enemies: new one-volume edition, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Rahim A., Mahony C., Bandyopadhyay S., 2024, Generative Artificial Intelligence as an enabler for citizen engagement, https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/governance/generative-artificialintelligence-enabler-citizen-engagement (10.09.2024).
Sieber R., 2006, Public participation and Geographic Information Systems: a literature review and framework, Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 96 (3), 491–507. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x.
Simonofski A.M., Johannessen R., Stendal K., 2024, Extended reality for citizen participation: a conceptual framework, systematic review and research agenda, Sustainable Cities and Society, 113, 105692. DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2024.105692.
Stirner M., 1995, Der Einzige und sein Eigentum (1845) / The ego and its own (1907), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Strobl J., 2014, Technological foundations for the GISociety [in:] T. Jekel, E. Sanchez, I. Gryl, C. Jouneau-Sion, J. Lyon (eds), Learning and teaching with geomedia, Cambridge Scholars, Newcastle upon Tyne, 2–9.
Strobl J., 2019, The geospatial capacity building ecosystem – developing the brainware for SDI [in:] A. Rajabifard (ed), Sustainable development goals connectivity dilemma, CRC Press – Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton. DOI: 10.1201/9780429290626.
Strobl J., 2024 (in print), Informing distributed hydrological modeling with worldwide open data services, International Journal of Geoinformatics.
Strobl B., Etter S., van Meerveld I., Seibert J., 2020, Accuracy of crowdsourced streamflow and stream level class estimates, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 65 (5), 823–841. DOI:10.1080/0 2626667.2019.1578966.
Sudmanns M., Augustin H., Killough B., Giuliani G., Tiede D., Leith A., Lewis A., 2022, Think global, cube local: an Earth observation data cube’s contribution to the Digital Earth vision, Big Earth Data, 7 (3), 831–859. DOI:10.1080/20964471.2022.2099236.
Tulloch D., 2008, Public participation GIS (PPGIS) [in:] K. Kemp (ed), Encyclopaedia of GIS, CA: SAGE, Thousand Oaks, 351–353.
UNECE, 2008, Standards of public participation: recommendations for good practice, https://unece.org (24.07.2023).
Vassilakopoulou P., Hustad E., 2023, Bridging digital divides: a literature review and research agenda for information systems research, Information Systems Frontiers, 25, 955–969. DOI:10.1007/s10796-020-10096-3.
Vogler R., Hennig S., 2013, Providing geomedia skills beyond (post) secondary education, GI_Forum, 2013, 317–327. DOI:10.1553/giscience2013s317.
Vogler R., Hennig S., 2024 (in print), Geomedia and education for sustainable development in visitor management: fundamentals of the spatially enabled learning approach, Increasing digitalization in visitor management: understanding and promoting the use of digital tools and (geo-)media regarding visitor management measures II, MMV12 (International Conference on Monitoring and Management of Visitors in Recreational and Protected Areas), Schneverdingen.
Wilkinson M., Dumontier M., Aalbersberg J., 2016, The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship, Scientific Data, 3 (1), 160018. DOI:10.1038/SDATA.2016.18.
White G., Zink A., Codecá L., Clarke S., 2021, A digital twin smart city for citizen feedback, Cities, 110, 103064. DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2020.103064.
Informacje: Prace Geograficzne, 2024, Zeszyt 175, s. 75-95
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Publikacja: 2024
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY 4.0
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
Angielski