The influence of inter-sector relationships on public resource allocation: Does the level of community deprivation count? An evaluation approach
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEThe influence of inter-sector relationships on public resource allocation: Does the level of community deprivation count? An evaluation approach
Data publikacji: 20.03.2014
Zarządzanie Publiczne, 2013, Numer 4 (24), s. 419 - 435
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843968ZP.13.034.1739Autorzy
The influence of inter-sector relationships on public resource allocation: Does the level of community deprivation count? An evaluation approach
This paper examines empirically a policy question whether or not there is a significant effect of the character of the relationships between the third sector organizations and public administration units for distribution of public resources at the local community level (gmina orcommunes). The key issue concerns the role of NGOs in making the level of community deprivation – measured by multidimensional index of local deprivation (MILD) – a factor in allocating resources to gmina (in the form of various subsidies accrued to it). An evaluation of the relative importance of the two competing criteria, equity andefficiency – which are typically, at least implicitly, involved in distribution of public resources – is conducted using public statistics data from the Bank of Local Data for years 2008 and 2010. Since it is usually assumed that the former remains of focus of the third sector units while the latter seems to remain under responsibility of the administration, one may expect that the type of relations between them will affect the prevalence of one of the two criteria over the others, without. however, knowledge of the circumstances conducive to it. Indeed, the results of empirical analysis reveal a clear pattern of the dependency –public resources obtained by gminas are shown to be on average both ‘need-adjusted’ and efficient when the relations are positive in character (however, not unconditionally – for instance, it is not true in the case of European Union’s funds). And that there is a form of complementarity between the above mentioned principles (equity and efficiency) under a certain pattern of interaction between non-profit organizations and administrative units at the local community – some of the circumstances suitable for such a desired type of effects are discussed in the paper.
Anand S., Sen A. (1997), Concepts of Human Development and Poverty: A Multidimensional Perspective, Human development papers, Human Development Report Office (UNDP).
Bellani L., Hunter G., Anand P. (2013), Multi-Dimensional Welfare: Do Groups Vary in their Priorities and Behaviours?, “Fiscal Studies”, Vol. 34, Iss. 3, pp. 333–354.
Bridger J.C., Alter T.C. (2006). Place, Community Development and Social Capital, “Community Development: Journal of the Community Development Society”, Vol. 37(1), pp. 5–18.
ESPON (2011), Project Future Orientations for Cities. Inception Report (November 2008).
Evers A., Laville J.-L. (2004), Defining the Third Sector in Europe [in:] E. Evers, J.-L. Laville (eds.), The Third Sector in Europe. Cheltenhama and Northhampton, Edward Elgar, pp. 11–42.
Gorzelak G. (2009), Cohesion and Convergence. Synonyms or Two Different Notions? [in:] G. Kohendorfer-Lucius, B. Pleskovic (eds.), Spatial Disparities and Development Policy, The World Bank, Washington D.C.
Gumkowska M., Herbst J., Radecki P. (2008), Podstawowe fakty o organizacjach pozarządowych. Raport z badania 2008, Stowarzyszenie Klon/Jawor, Warszawa, http://civicpedia.ngo.pl/files/civicpedia.pl/public/raporty/podstawowe_fakty_2008 (access: 5.11.2012).
Jenei G., Kuti E. (2008), The Third Sector and Civil Society [in:] S.P. Osborne (ed.), The Third Sector in Europe. Prospects and Challenges, London–New York.
Kohendorfer-Lucius G., Pleskovic I.B. (eds.) (2009), Spatial Disparities and Development Policy, The World Bank, Washington D.C.
Mackiewicz M. (2011), Wyniki badań. Konkurencyjność Mazowsza i jej uwarunkowania w ramach projektu “Trendy rozwojowe Mazowsza”, II Forum Mazowieckie, Warszawa.
Malina A. (2004), The Factor Analysis in Research of the Spatial Differentiation of Poland’s Economic Structure, “Statistics in Transition, The Polish Statistical Association and Central Statistical Office”, Vol. 6, No. 7, pp. 1175–1188.
Merton R.K. (1957), Priorities in scientific discovery, “American Sociological Review”, Vol. 22, pp. 639–659.
MBPR (2011), Monitoring Strategii Rozwoju Województwa Mazowieckiego do roku 2020. Synteza Raportu, Mazowieckie Biuro Planowania Regionalnego (MBPR), Warsaw.
Okrasa W. (2004). Targeting Social Investment Fund on Poor Villages in the Republic of Moldova, Report for the World Bank-Moldova Social Investment Fund (MSIF), Mimeo, Chisinau.
Okrasa W. (2008), Sektor trzeci jako przedmiot badań statystyki publicznej. Wybrane problemy [in:] Statystyka społeczna – dokonania, szanse, perspektywy, Biblioteka Wiadomości Statystycznych GUS, t. 57, Warszawa, pp. 124–138.
Okrasa W. (2011), Public Administration and the Third Sector: Models of inter-sector interaction in the development context in light of empirical evidence (in Polish), “Administracja i Społeczeństwo”, Higher School of Social Administration in Warsaw, Warsaw.
Okrasa W. (2012a), Relacje międzysektorowe i dystrybucja środków publicznych. Zależność wpływu deprywacji lokalnej na alokację zasobów w gminach od charakteru związków pomiędzy organizacjami pozarządowymi i administracją publiczną, “Administracja iSpołeczeństwo”, No. 7, Higher School of Social Administration in Warsaw, Warszawa.
Okrasa W. (2012b), Spatially Integrated Social Research and Official Statistics: Methodological Remarks and Empirical Results on Local Development, “Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe”.
Okrasa W., Herbst J. (2012), Rodzaje uczestnictwa. Instytucje społeczne Kościoła i jednostki parafialne w świetle badań statystyczno-socjologicznych, Wydawnictwo UKSW, Warszawa.
Okrasa W., Witek B. (2011), The Intersectoral Relationships and the Distribution of Public Support: How the Local Deprivation Affects Resource Allocation at the Community Level? (in English), Tambow.
Okrasa W., Lapins J., Vremis M. (2006), Measuring Community Deprivation for Geographic Targeting of Public Resources – case of Moldova, “Statistics in Transition, The Polish Statistical Association and Central Statistical Office”, Vol. 7, No. 5 (June), Warszawa.
Osborne S.P. (ed.) (2008), The Third Sector in Europe. Prospects and Challenges, London–New York.
Project Future Orientations for Cities. Inception Report (November 2008), ESPON.
Salamon L. (2006), Government-Nonprofit Relations from an International Perspective [in:] E.T. Boris, C.E. Steuerle (eds.), Nonprofits & Government. Collaboration & Conflict, Washington D.C.
Sienicka A. (2010), Nowelizacja ustawy o działalności organizacji pożytku publicznego i o wolontariacie, “Biuletyn” 2010, Nr 1, www.ekonomiaspołeczna.pl (access: 17.10.2012).
United Nations (2003), Non-profit Institutions. Handbook Implementation Guidance Manual. CCSS The John Hopkins University.
Young D.R. (2006), Complementary, Supplementary, or Adversarial? Nonprofit-Government Relations [in:] E.T. Boris, C.E. Steuerle (eds.), Nonprofits & Government. Collaboration & Conflict, Washington D.C.
Act of 24th April 2004 concerning activities of the Public Benefit Organizations and Volunteering (Ustawa z 24 kwietnia 2004 r. o działalności pożytku publicznego i o wolontariacie, Dz.U. 2003, nr 96, poz. 873).
Act of 29th January 2004 concerning the Law of Public Orderings (Ustawa z 29 stycznia 2004 r. Prawo zamówień publicznych, Dz.U. 2007, nr 223, poz. 1655; oraz Ustawa Zasady i tryb udzielania zamówień publicznych, środki ochrony prawnej, kontrola udzielania zamówień publicznych i organy właściwe w sprawach regulowanych przez prawo, Dz.U. 2008, nr 171, poz. 1058).
Informacje: Zarządzanie Publiczne, 2013, Numer 4 (24), s. 419 - 435
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
The influence of inter-sector relationships on public resource allocation: Does the level of community deprivation count? An evaluation approach
The influence of inter-sector relationships on public resource allocation: Does the level of community deprivation count? An evaluation approach
Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego, Dewajtis 5, Warszawa
Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego, Dewajtis 5, Warszawa
Publikacja: 20.03.2014
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: Żadna
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
AngielskiLiczba wyświetleń: 1986
Liczba pobrań: 1188