FAQ
Logotyp Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego

The Relationship between Peace, State and Democracy: Bosnia and Herzegovina an Deviant Case

Data publikacji: 06.04.2018

Teoria Polityki, 2018, Nr 2/2018, s. 249 - 260

https://doi.org/10.4467/25440845TP.18.014.8449

Autorzy

Mirjana Kasapović
University of Zagreb, Trg maršala Tita 14, HR-10000 Zagreb Croatia
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Tytuły

The Relationship between Peace, State and Democracy: Bosnia and Herzegovina an Deviant Case

Abstrakt

The conventional wisdom in political theory for a long time was that the establishment of peace is a prerequisite for state building and that state building is a prerequisite for the development of democracy. This conventional wisdom of the relationship between peace, state and democracy has been disturbed several times in Bosnia and Hercegovina from the first democratic elections in 1990 to the present day. This short overview of political attitudes of the three constitutive ethnic communities – Muslims/Bosniaks, Serbs and Croats – and their elected political representatives shows that there is no consensus on the state and on the political order, but only on the political democracy.

Bibliografia

Baer, J. (2000). “Who, Why and How: Assessing the Legitimacy of Secession”. Swiss Political Science Review, 6 (3), pp. 45–69.

Bardos, G.N. (2013). Ethnoconfessional Nationalism in the Balkans: Analysis, Manifestation and Management. Bardos_columbia_0054D_11191.pdf (access: 20.12.2016).

Basta, K. (2016). “Imagined Institutions: The Symbolic Power of Formal Rules in Bosnia and Herzegovina”. Slavic Review, 75 (4), pp. 944–969.

Berg, E. (2012). “Parent States versus Secessionist Entities: Measuring Political Legitimacy in Cyprus, Moldova, and Bosnia & Herzegovina”. Europe-Asia Studies, 64 (7), pp. 1271–1296.

Berg, E. (2013). “Merging Together or Drifting Apart? Revisiting Political Legitimacy Issues in Cyprus, Moldova and Bosnia and Herzegovina”. Geopolitics, 18 (82), pp. 467–492.

Bieber, F. (2008). Bosna i Hercegovina poslije rata: Politički sistem u podijeljenom društvu. Sarajevo: Buybook.

Bojkov, V.D. (2003). “Democracy in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Post-1995 Political System and its Functioning”. Southeast European Politics, 4 (1), pp. 41–67.

Bose, S. (2002). Bosnia after Dayton. New York: Oxford University Press.

Caspersen, N. (2012). Unrecognized States: The Struggle for Sovereignty in the Modern International System. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Chandler, D. (2000). Bosnia: Faking Democracy After Dayton. London: Pluto Press.

Chollet, D. (2007). Tajna povijest Daytona, Zagreb: Golden marketing-Tehnička knjiga.

Cohen, L.J. (1998). “Whose Bosnia? The Politics of Nation Building”. Current History, 97 (617), pp. 103–112.

Dahl, R.A. (1971). Poliarchy: Participation and Opposition, Berkeley: University of California Press.

Dodik, M. (2011). “Disolucija BiH neminovna stvar”. Argumenti, 5 (12), pp. 13–21.

Gromes, T. (2007). Demokratisierung nach Burgerkriegen. Das Beispiel Bosnien und Herzegowina. Frankfurt–New York: Campus Verlag.

Gromes, T. (2011). “Demokratisierung trotz fehlender Voraussetzungen? Bosnien und Herzegowina, Kosovo und Mazedonien im Verglech”. Zeitschrift fur Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 5 (2), pp. 253–276.

Hale, H.E. (2004). “Divided We Stand: Institutional Sources of Ethnofederal State Survival and Collapse”. World Politics, 56 (2), pp. 165–193.

Hayden, R.M. (2005). “‘Democracy’ without a Demos? The Bosnian Constitutional Experiment and the Intentional Construction of Nonfunctioning States”. East European Politics and Societies, 19 (2), pp. 226–259.

Hoare, A.M. (1997). “The Croatian Project to Partition Bosnia-Herzegovina, 1990–1994”. East European Quarterly, 31 (1), pp. 121–138.

Kasapović, M. (2005). “Bosnia and Herzegovina: Liberal or Consociational Democracy?” Croatian Political Science Review, 42 (5), pp. 3–30.

Kasapović, M. (2016). “Lijphart and Horowitz in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Institutional Design for Conflict Resolution or Conflict Reproduction?” Croatian Political Science Review, 53 (4), pp. 174–190.

Keranen, O. (2014). “Building States and Identities in Post-Conflict States: Symbolic Practices in Post-Dayton Bosnia”. Civil Wars, 16 (2), pp. 127–146.

Kohlmann, E.F. (2004). Al Qaida’s Jihad in Europe: The Afghan-Bosnian Network. Oxford: Berg.

Kolsto, P. (2006). “The Sustainability and Future of Unrecognized Quasi-States”. Journal of Peace Research, 43 (6), pp. 723–740.

Komšić, I. (2006). Preživljena zemlja. Zagreb: Prometej.

Linz, J.J. (1997). “Democracy Today: An Agenda for Students of Democracy”. Scandinavian Political Studies, 20 (2), pp. 115–134.

Linz, J.J., Stepan, A. (1992). “Political Identities and Electoral Sequences: Spain, the Soviet Union, and Yugoslavia ”. Deadalus, 121 (2), pp. 123–139.

Linz, J.J., Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Marshall, T.H. (2009). “Citizenship and Social Class”. In: J. Manza, M. Sauder (eds.). Inequality and Society. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., pp. 148–154.

Mearsheimer, J.J., Van Evera, S. (1995). “Even Peace Means War ”. The New Republic, 18.12.1995, pp. 16–21.

Moller, J., Skaaning, S.-E. (2011). “Stateness first?”. Democratization, 18 (1), pp. 1–24.

O’Donnell, G. (2001). “Democracy, Law, and Comparative Politics ”. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36 (1), pp. 7–36.

Ó Tuathail, G., O’Loughlin, J., Djipa, D. (2006). “Bosnia-Herzegovina Ten Years after Dayton: Constitutional Change and Public Opinion”. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 47 (1), pp. 61–75.

Pegg, S. (2004). “From de Facto States to States-Within States: Progress, Problems, and Prospects”. In: P. Kingston, I. Spears (eds.). States within States: Incipient Political Entities in the Post-Cold WarEra. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 35–46.

Petersen, R.D. (2011). Western Intervention in the Balkans: The Strategic Use of Emotion in Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rajčević, S. (2012). “Deset pogleda na budućnost Republike Srpske”. Argumenti (April), pp. 163–190.

Reuter, J. (1997). “Die Bosnisch-Kroatische Föderation. Künstliches Gebilde oder lebensfähiger Staat?” Sudosteuropa, 46 (3–4), pp. 158–169.

Ribičič, C. (2001). Geneza jedne zablude. Zagreb: Jesenski i Turk.

Schneckener, U. (2002). “Making Power-Sharing Work: Lessons from Successes and Failures in Ethnic Conflict Regulation ”. Journal of Peace Research, 39 (2), pp. 203–228.

Schumpeter, J.A. (1976). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London–New York: Routledge.

Skalnik Leff, C. (1999). “Democratization and Disintegration in Multinational States: The Breakup of The Communist Federations”. World Politics, 51 (2), pp. 205–235.

Stepan, A. (2001). Arguing Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Weller, M., Wolff, S. (2006). “Bosnia and Herzegovina Ten Years after Dayton: Lessons for Internationalized State Building”. Ethnopolitics, 5 (1), pp. 1–13.

Zahar, M.-J. (2004). “Republika Srpska”. In: T. Bahcheli, B. Bartmann, H. Srebnik (eds.). De Facto States: The Quest for Sovereignty. London–New York: Routledge, pp. 32–51.

Informacje

Informacje: Teoria Polityki, 2018, Nr 2/2018, s. 249 - 260

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:

The Relationship between Peace, State and Democracy: Bosnia and Herzegovina an Deviant Case

Angielski:

The Relationship between Peace, State and Democracy: Bosnia and Herzegovina an Deviant Case

Autorzy

University of Zagreb, Trg maršala Tita 14, HR-10000 Zagreb Croatia

Publikacja: 06.04.2018

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND  ikona licencji

Udział procentowy autorów:

Mirjana Kasapović (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Angielski