FAQ
Logotyp Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego

The Dismal Science of Post-Marxist Political Theory:  Is There a Future in Postindustrial Socialism?

Data publikacji: 06.04.2018

Teoria Polityki, 2018, Nr 2/2018, s. 207 - 236

https://doi.org/10.4467/25440845TP.18.012.8447

Autorzy

Clyde W. Barrow
University of Texas - Rio Grande Valley 1201 West University Drive Edinburg, Texas 78539-2909
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Tytuły

The Dismal Science of Post-Marxist Political Theory:  Is There a Future in Postindustrial Socialism?

Abstrakt

The fusion of postindustrial social theory with a new left political critique of classical Marxism resulted in a distinctly Post-Marxist political theory. This distinct political theory emerged during the 1980s, although it was quickly pushed aside by globalization studies in the 1990s. This paper argues that Post-Marxism is conceptually distinct from post-modernism, post-structuralism, and other variants of the New Left with most fundamental distinction being the idea that Marxian concepts are still necessary, if not sufficient for understanding postindustrial and global capitalism. More specifically, theorists such as André Gorz, Jürgen Habermas, Antonio Negri, and Claus Offe, among others, have articulated the foundations of this uniquely Post-Marxist political theory by anchoring their economic analysis of postindustrial capitalism in Marx’s Grundrisse rather than Capital. This conceptual shift has enabled Post-Marxists to construct a theoretically powerful analysis of postindustrial capitalism, the new movements, and socialist policy that was remarkably prescient, although none of the Post-Marxists has successfully solved the problem of a contemporary historical subject and political agency.

Bibliografia

Anderson, P. (1976). Considerations on Western Marxism. London: New Left Books.

Aronowitz, S. (1981). The Crisis of Historical Materialism: Class, Politics, and Culture in Western Marxist Theory. New York: Praeger.

Aronson, R. (1995). After Marxism. New York: The Guilford Press.

Baran, P.A., Sweezy, P.M. (1966). Monopoly Capital: An Essay on the American Economic and Social Order. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Barrow, C.W. (1993). Critical Theories of the State: Marxist, Neo-Marxist, Post-Marxist. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Barrow, C.W., Keck, M. (2017). “Symposium/State – Globalization Theory and State Theory: The False Antinomy.” Studies in Political Economy, 98 (2), pp. 1–20.

Baynes, K. (2016). Habermas, London–New York: Routledge.

Bell, D. (1973). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society, New York: Basic Books.

Bluestone, B., Harrison, B. (1982). The Deindustrialization of America. New York: Basic Books.

Boggs, C. (1986). Social Movements and Political Power: Emerging Forms of Radicalism in the West. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Borchert, J., Lessenich, S. (2016). Claus Offe and the Critical Theory of the Capitalist State. New York: Routledge.

Bowles, S., Gintis, H. (1982). “The Crisis of Liberal Democratic Capitalism: The Case of the United States.” Politics and Society, 11 (1), pp. 51–93.

Bowles, S., Gordon, D.M., Weisskopf, T.E. (1990). After the Wasteland: A Democratic Economics for the Year 2000. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.

Caffentzis, G.C. (2011). “Immeasurable Value? An Essay on Marx’s Legacy.” In: P. Lamarche, M. Rosenkrantz, D. Sherman (eds.). Reading Negri: Marxism in the Age of Empire. Chicago: Open Court.

Callinicos, A. (2005). “Antonio Negri and the Temptation of Ontology.” In: T.S. Murphy, A. Mustapha (eds.). The Philosophy of Antonio Negri: Resistance in Theory, vol. 2. London: Pluto Press.

Clarke, S. (ed.) (1991). The State Debate. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Commons, J.R. (1924). Legal Foundations of Capitalism. New York: Macmillan.

Drucker, P.F. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

Engels, F. (1939). Anti-Duhring: Herr Eugen Duhring’s Revolution in Science. New York: International Publishers.

Frankel, B. (1987). The Post-Industrial Utopians. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Giddens, A. (1983). A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism, Berkeley–Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Glyn, A., Sutcliffe, B. (1972). Capitalism in Crisis. New York: Pantheon Books.

Gorz, A. (1967). Strategy for Labor. Boston: Beacon Press.

Gorz, A. (1982). Farewell to the Working Class: An Essay on Postindustrial Socialism. Boston: South End Press.

Gorz, A. (1986). Paths to Paradise: Essays on the Liberation from Work. Boston: South End Press.

Gorz, A. (1989). Critique of Economic Reason. London: Verso.

Habermas, J. (1970). Toward a Rational Society. Boston: Beacon Press.

Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston: Beacon Press.

Harrison, O. (2014). Revolutionary Subjectivity in Post-Marxist Thought: Laclau, Negri, Badiou. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.

Harvey, D. (1982). The Limits to Capital. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Hinrichs, K., Offe, C., Wiesenthal, H. (1984–1985). “The Crisis of the Welfare State and Alternative Modes of Work Redistribution.” Thesis Eleven, 10–11, pp. 37–55.

Hirsch, A. (1981). The French New Left: An Intellectual History from Sartre to Gorz. Boston: South End Press.

Hirsch, J. (1983). “The Fordist Security State and New Social Movements.” Kapitalistate, 10–11, pp. 75–87.

Hirst, P.Q. (ed.) (1989). The Pluralist Theory of the State. London: Routledge.

Kriesi, H. (1995). New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Laclau, E., Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.

Levine, A. (1993). Rousseau, Marx, and Communism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lévy, H.-B. (1979). Barbarism with a Human Face. New York: Harper and Row.

Little, A. (1996). The Political Thought of André Gorz. New York: Routledge.

Lodziak, C., Tatman, J. (1997). André Gorz: A Critical Introduction. London: Pluto Press.

Marcuse, H. (1964). One-Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon Press.

Mallet, S. (1975). Essays on the New Working Class. St. Louis: Telos Press.

Mandel, E. (1978). Late Capitalism. London: Verso.

Marx, K. (1971). The Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy, ed. and transl. by D. McLellan. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.

Marx, K. (1973a). Critique of the Gotha Program. New York: International Publishers.

Marx, K. (1973b). Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy, transl. with a Foreward by M. Nicolaus. New York: Random House.

Marx, K. (1977). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, vol. 1. New York: Vintage Books.

Marx, K., Engels, F. (1971 [1848]). The Communist Manifesto. New York: Pathfinder Press Inc.

Negri, A. (1989). The Politics of Subversion: A Manifesto for the Twenty-First Century, transl. by J. Newell. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.

Negri, A. (1991). Marx Beyond Marx: Lessons on the “Grundrisse”, transl. by H. Cleaver, M. Ryan, M. Viano, ed. by J. Fleming. Brooklyn, NY: Autonomedia.

Negri, A. (1999). Insurgencies: Constituent Power and the Modern State, transl. by M. Boscagli. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Nicolaus, M. (1968). “The Unknown Marx”. New Left Review, 41 (March/April), pp. 41–61.

Offe, C. (1972). “Advanced Capitalism and the Welfare State.” Politics and Society, 2, pp. 479–488.

Offe, C. (1973). “The Abolition of Market Control and the Problem of Legitimacy (II).” Kapitalistate, 2, pp. 73–75.

Offe, C. (1984). Contradictions of the Welfare State. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Offe, C. (1985a). Disorganized Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Offe, C. (1985b). “New Social Movements: Challenging the Boundaries of Institutional Politics.” Social Research, 52 (4), pp. 817–868.

Offe, C. (1987). “Challenging the Boundaries of Institutional Politics: Social Movements Since the 1960s.” In: C.S. Maier (ed.). Changing Boundaries of the Political. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Offe, C. (1996). Modernity and the State. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Olson, M. (1984). The Rise and Decline of Nations. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Pierson, C. (1995). Socialism after Communism. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Poggi, G. (1990). The State: Its Nature, Development, and Prospects. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Polanyi, K. (1957). The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.

Poster, M. (1975). Existential Marxism in Postwar France: From Sartre to Althusser. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Przeworski, A. (1980). “Material Interest, Class Compromise, and the Transition to Socialism.” Politics and Society 10 (2), pp. 125–153.

Przeworski, A. (1985). Capitalism and Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reich, C. (1964). “The New Property”. Yale Law Journal, 73 (5), pp. 733–787.

Reich, R.B. (1991). The Work of Nations. New York: Vintage Books.

Reichelt, H. (2000). “Jürgen Harbermas’ Reconstruction of Historical Materialism.” In: W. Bonefeld, K. Psychopedis (eds.). The Politics of Change: Globalization, Ideology and Critique. New York: Palgrave Publishers Ltd.

Rockmore, T. (1989). Habermas on Historical Materialism. Bloomington–Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

Schmitter, P.C. (ed.) (1985). Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, Inc.

Sim, S. (ed.) (1998). Post-Marxism: A Reader. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.

Sim, S. (2001). Post-Marxism: An Intellectual History. London–New York: Routledge.

Touraine, A. (1971). The Post-Industrial Society. New York: Random House.

Touraine, A. (1987). Return of the Actor: Social Theory in Postindustrial Society. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Tucker, R.C. (ed.) (1978). The Marx-Engels Reader, 2nd ed. New York: W.W. Norton and Co. Inc.

Weeks, K. (2005). “The Refusal of Work as Demand and Perspective.” In: T.S. Murphy, A. Mustapha (eds.). The Philosophy of Antonio Negri: Resistance in Practice, vol. 1. London: Pluto Press.

Informacje

Informacje: Teoria Polityki, 2018, Nr 2/2018, s. 207 - 236

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:

The Dismal Science of Post-Marxist Political Theory:  Is There a Future in Postindustrial Socialism?

Angielski:

The Dismal Science of Post-Marxist Political Theory:  Is There a Future in Postindustrial Socialism?

Autorzy

University of Texas - Rio Grande Valley 1201 West University Drive Edinburg, Texas 78539-2909

Publikacja: 06.04.2018

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND  ikona licencji

Udział procentowy autorów:

Clyde W. Barrow (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Angielski