Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Austin, J.L. (1962). Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Collier, D., Hidalgo, D.F., Maciuceanu, A.O. (2006). “Essentially Contested Concepts: Debates and Applications”. Journal of political Ideologies, 2, pp. 211–246.

Connolly, W. (1993/1974). The Terms of Political Discourse. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam’s Sons.

Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, Intersubjective, and Objective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dworkin, R. (1972). “The Jurisprudence of Richard Nixon”. New York Review of Books, 18, pp. 27–35.

Easton, D. (1953). The Political System. New York: Knopf.

Easton, D. (1965). A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Fodor, J. (1975). The Language of Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Freeden, M. (2008). Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Freeden, M. (2013). The Political Theory of Political Thinking: The Anatomy of a Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gallie, W.B. (1956). “Essentially Contested Concepts”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, pp. 167–198.

Goertz, G. (2005). Social Scientific Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Grafstein, R. (1988). “A Realist Foundation for Essentially Contested Concepts”. Western Political Quarterly, 41, pp. 9–28.

Grice, H.P. (1982). “Meaning Revisited”. In: V. Smith (ed.). Mutual Knowledge, New York: Academic Press.

Hirsch, E.D. (1976). The Aims of Interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Koselleck, R. (2002). The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2^nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. (2008). The Political Mind: A Cognitive Scientist’s Guide to Your Brain and Politics. New York: Penguin.

Lowi, T., Calise, M. (2011). Hyperpolitics: An Interactive Dictionary of Political Science Concepts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A Radical View. New York: Macmillan.

MacIntyre, A. (1973). “The Essential Contestability of Some Social Concepts”. Ethics, 84, pp. 1–9.

Mason, A. (1990). “Explaining Political Disagreement: The Notion of an Essentially Contested Concept”. Inquiry, 33, pp. 81–98.

Mouffe, Ch. (1996). “Deconstruction, Pragmatism, and the Politics of Democracy”. In: Ch. Mouffe (ed.). Deconstruction and Pragmatism. Deconstruction, Pragmatism, and the Politics of Democracy. London: Routledge.

Pinker, S. (2007). The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature. New York: Penguin.

Pitkin, H. (1972/1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Political Concepts: A Critical Lexicon, http://www.politicalconcepts.org/ (accessed: 7.04.2017).

Putnam, H. (1999). The Three-Fold Cord: Mind, Body, and World. New York: Columbia University Press.

Radaelli, C.M. (2000). “Whether Europeanization: Concept Stretching and Substantive Change”. European Integration, online papers, 4:#8.

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Ryle, G. (1932). “Systematically Misleading Expressions”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 32.

Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.

Sartori, G. (1970). “Concept Formation in Comparative Politics”. American Political Science Review, 64, pp. 1033–1053.

Sartori, G. (1984). Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis. London: Sage Publications.

Searle, J. (1992). The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Sellars, W. (1956). “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind”. In: H. Feigl, M. Scriven (eds.). Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 1: The Foundations of Science the Concepts of Psychology and Psychoanalysis (pp. 253–329). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Skinner, Q. (1969). “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas”. History and Theory, 8, pp. 3–53.

Skinner, Q. (1972). “Motives, Intentions, and the Interpretation of Texts”. New Literary History, 3, pp. 400–407.

Strauss, L. (1932). “Notes on Carl Schmitt, The Concept of the Political”. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, Vol. 67, No. 6.

Strauss, L. (1957). “Machiavelli’s Intention: The Prince”. American Political Science Review, 51, pp. 13–40.

Swanton, Ch. (1985). “On the Essential Contestedness of Political Concepts”. Ethics, 95, pp. 811–827.

Taylor, Ch. (1971). “Interpretation and the Sciences of Man”. Review of Metaphysics, 25(1), pp. 3–51.

Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Waldron, J. (1989). “Rights in Conflict”. Ethics, 99, pp. 503–519.

Waldron, J. (2002). “Is the Rule of Law An Essentially Contested Concept (In Florida)?”. Law and Philosophy, 21, pp. 137–164.

Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On Certainty. Oxford: Blackwell.

Wittgenstein, L. (1978). Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. Oxford: Blackwell.

Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical Investigations, P.M.S. Hacker, J. Schulte (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell.

Wolin, S.S. (1960). Politics and Vision. Boston: Little, Brown.