FAQ

THE CORRELATION OF LINGUISTIC PATTERNING AND SOCIETAL STRUCTURES IN SYSTEMIC TYPOLOGY

Data publikacji: 22.03.2018

Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 2018, Volume 135, Issue 1, s. 81 - 96

https://doi.org/10.4467/20834624SL.18.007.8167

Autorzy

Andrii Danylenko
Pace University, New York
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Tytuły

THE CORRELATION OF LINGUISTIC PATTERNING AND SOCIETAL STRUCTURES IN SYSTEMIC TYPOLOGY

Abstrakt

The article discusses the premises of the systemic typology of G. P. Mel’nikov in comparison with the precepts of the sociolinguistic typology of P. Trudgill. The author, in particular, looks into the correlation of linguistic patterning and societal structures as presented in the two theories, and offers a detailed synopsis of the societal factors and their valuables (external determinants) used in the respective disciplines. Detailed discussion of the societal factors as presented in the systemic and social typologies is offered. Major differences between their classifications in Mel’nikov and Trudgill are substantiated. Finally, based on the postulates of Mel’nikov’s typology, the paper dwells on the concept of internal determinant or, the communicative scope which optimizes all the levels of language system, while co-varying types of social structures with types of linguistic patterning.

Bibliografia

Adelaar W.F.H. [with the collaboration of Pieter V. Muysken]. 2004. The languages of the Andes. Cambridge.

Alpatov V.M. 2006. Aktual’no li učenie Marra? – Voprosy jazykoznanija 1: 3–15.

Andersen H. 2006. Grammation, regrammation, and degrammation. Tense loss in Rus­sian. – Diachronica 23.2: 231–258.

Andersen H. 2009. Reduplication in Slavic and Baltic: Loss and renewal. – Morphology 19: 113–134.

Bauer B. 2000. Archaic syntax in Indo-European. Berlin, New York.

Bohas G. 2006. The organization of the lexicon in Arabic and other Semitic languages. – Boudelaa S. (ed.). Perspectives on Arabic linguistics XVI. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: 1–37.

Bois J.W. du. 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. – Language 63.4: 805–855.

Cerrón-Palomino R. 1987. Lingüística Quechua. Cuzco.

Comrie B. 2008. Inflectional morphology and language contact, with special reference to mixed languages. – Simund P., Kintana N. (eds.). Language contact and contact languages. Amsterdam: 15–32.

Danylenko A. 2000/1997. The genitive of agent and the instrumental of means in Old Ukrain­ian: An old idea worth revising? – General Linguistics 37.1: 41–70.

Danylenko A. 2003. Predykaty, vidminky i diatezy v ukrajins’kij movi: istoryčnyj i typolohičnyj aspekty. Kharkiv.

Danylenko A. 2005. Is there any possessive perfect in North Russian? – Word 56.3: 347–379.

Danylenko A. 2011. Linguistic and cultural border crossings in the Grand Duchy of Lithu­ania or, can the Grand Duchy of Lithuania be defined as a Sprachareal? – Petit D. (ed.). Langues baltiques, langues slaves. Paris: 141–173.

Danylenko A. 2012. Auxiliary clitics in Southwest Ukrainian: Questions of chronology, areal distribution, and grammaticalization. – Journal of Slavic Linguistics 20.1: 3–34.

Danylenko A. 2013. Ukrainian in the language map of Central Europe: Questions of areal-typological profiling. – Journal of Language Contact 6.1: 134–159.

Danylenko A. 2015. On the mechanisms of the grammaticalization of comitative and instru­mental categories in Slavic. – Journal of Historical Linguistics 5.2: 267–296.

Dixon R.M.W. 1997. The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge.

Fenk-Oczlon G., Fenk A. 1999. Cognition, quantitative linguistics, and systemic typology. – Linguistic Typology 3.2: 151–177.

Fenk-Oczlon G., Fenk A. 2008. Complexity trade-offs between the subsystems of language. – Miestamo M., Sinnemäki K., Karlsson F. (eds.). Language complexity. Typology, contact, change. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: 43–65.

Gil D. 2008. How complex are isolating languages? – Miestamo M., Sinnemäki K., Karlsson F. (eds.). Language complexity. Typology, contact, change. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: 109–131.

Harris A., Campbell L. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge.

Haspelmath M., Michaelis S.M. 2017. Analytic and synthetic: Typological change in varie­ties of European languages. – Buchstaller I., Siebenhaar B. (eds.). Language variation – European perspectives VI. [Selected papers from the 8th International Conference on Language Variation in Europe, Leipzig 2015]. Amsterdam: 1–17.

Haudricourt A.G. 1961. Richesse en phonèmes et richesse en locutions. – L’Homme. Revue française d’anthropologie 1.1: 5–10.

Heine B., Kuteva T. 2005. Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge.

Heine B., Kuteva T. 2006. The changing languages of Europe. Oxford, New York.

Humboldt W. von. 1836. Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwickelung des Menschengeschlechts. Berlin.

Kjamilev S.X., Mel’nikov G.P. 1983. Problema minimal’nyx smyslorazličitel’nyx i značaščix edinic v jazykax semitskogo stroja. – Voprosy jazykoznanija 5: 87–96.

Kusters Ch.W. 2000. Morphological simplification: More than erosion? – Gilbers D., Ner­bonne J., Schaeken J. (eds.). Languages in contact. Amsterdam, Atlanta: 225–230.

Kusters Ch.W. 2003. Linguistic complexity. The influence of social change on verbal inflec­tion. Utrecht.

Kusters Ch.W. 2008. Complexity in linguistic theory, language learning and language change. – Miestamo M., Sinnemäki K, Karlsson F. (eds.). Language complexity: Typol­ogy, contact, change. Amsterdam: 3–22.

Lutin S.A. 1990. Sistemno-tipologičeskij analiz rezul’tativnyx konstrukcij russkix govorov Severa i Severo-Zapada. [Candidate of Science Dissertation; Peoples’ Friendship Uni­versity, Moscow].

Marr N.Ja. 1934. Aktual’nye problemy i očerednye zadači jafetičeskoj teorii. – Marr N.Ja. Izbrannye raboty. [vol. 3: Jazyk i obščestvo]. Moscow, Leningrad: 61–77.

Martinet A. 1979. Shunting on to ergative or accusative. – Plank F. (ed.). Ergativity. Toward a theory of grammatical relations. London: 39–43.

Maslov J.S. 1948. Vid i leksičeskoe značenie glagola v russkom jazyke. – Izvestija Akademii Nauk SSSR. Serija literatury i jazyka 7.4: 303–316.

McWhorter J.H. 2001. The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. – Linguistic Typology 5.1: 125–166.

McWhorter J.H. 2008. Why does a language undress? – Miestamo M., Sinnemäki K., Karlsson F. (eds.). Language complexity. Typology, contact, change. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: 167–190.

Meillet A. 1922. Des innovations du verbe slave. – Revue des études slaves 22.1: 38–46.

Meillet A. 1924. Le slave commun. Paris.

Mel’nikov G.P. 1969. Jazykovaja stratifikacija i klassifikacija jazykov. – Edinicy raznyx urovnej jazyka i ix vzaimodejstvie. Moscow: 45–73.

Mel’nikov G.P. 1971. Determinanta – veduščaja grammatičeskaja tendencija jazyka. – Fone­tika, fonologija, grammatika. [K semidesjatiletiju A.A. Reformatskogo]. Moscow: 359–367.

Mel’nikov G.P. 1973. Sistemnyj podxod v lingvistike. – Sistemnye issledovanija 1972. Mos­cow: 183–204.

Mel’nikov G. P. 1986. Sistemnaja lingvistika Gumbol’dta–Sreznevskogo–Potebni–Boduèna i sovremennaja sistemnaja tipologija jazykov. – Problemy tipologičeskoj, funkcional’noj i opisatel’noj lingvistiki. Moscow: 13–26.

Mel’nikov G.P. 1988a. Kommunikativnyj rakurs – osnova semantičeskogo i grammatičeskogo svoeobrazija jazyka kak izobrazitel’noj znakovoj sistemy. – Metodologija lingvistiki i aspekty izučenija jazyka. Moscow: 13–26.

Mel’nikov G.P. 1988b. Systemology and linguistic aspects of cybernetics. Amsterdam.

Mel’nikov G. P. 1997. Ketegorii stepeni dlitel’nosti glagol’nogo dejstvija i ee svjaz’ s katego­riej vida. – Trudy aspektologičeskogo seminara filologičeskogo fakul’teta MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova. [vol. 1]. Moscow: 122–139.

Mel’nikov G.P. 2003. Sistemnaja tipologija jazykov. Moscow.

Miestamo M., Sinnemäki K., Karlsson F. (eds.). 2008. Language complexity. Typology, contact, change. Amsterdam, Philadelphia.

Milroy J., Milroy L. 1985. Linguistic change, social network and speaker. – Journal of Lin­guistics 21: 339–384.

Oksaar E. 1999. Social networks, communicative acts and the multilingual individual. Meth­odological issues in the field of language change. – Jahr E.H. (ed.). Language change: Advances in historical sociolinguistics. Berlin, New York: 3–19.

Orr R.A. 1999. Evolutionary biology and historical linguistics. – Diachronica 16.1: 123–157.

Plank F. 1986. Preface. – Folia Linguistics 20: 1–2.

Plank F. 1998. The co-variation of phonology with morphology and syntax: A hopeful his­tory. – Linguistic Typology 2: 195–230.

Polikarpov A.A. 1989. Èlementy teoretičeskoj sociolingvistiki. Moscow.

Potebnja A.A. 1941. Iz zapisok po russkoj grammatike. [vol. 4: Glagol. Mestoimenie. Čislitel’noe. Predlog]. Moscow, Leningrad.

Rodionov V.A. 1989. “Cel’nosistemnaja tipologija” vs. “častnaja tipologija”. – Voprosy ja­zykoznanija 1: 16–30.

Sampson G., Gil D., Trudgill P. (eds.). 2009. Language complexity as an evolving variable. Oxford.

Schwegler A. 1990. Analyticity and syntheticity. A diachronic retrospective with special refer­ence to Romance languages. Berlin, New York.

Sgall P. 1971. On the notion of ‘type of language’. – Travaux linguistiques de Prague 4: Études de la phonologie, typologie et de la languistique generale. Prague: 75–87.

Silina V.B. 1982. Istorija kategorii glagol’nogo vida. – Avanesov R.I., Ivanov V.V. Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka. Morfologija. Glagol. Moscow: 158–279.

Sinnemäki K. 2009. Complexity in core argument marking and population size. – Samp­son G., Gil D., Trudgill P. (eds.). 2009. Language complexity as an evolving variable. Oxford: 126–140.

Skalička V. 1966. Ein “typologisches Konstrukt”. – Travaux linguistiques de Prague 2: Les pro­blèmes du centre et de la périphérie du systemme de la langue. Prague: 157–166.

Sreznevskij I.I. 1887. Mysli ob istorii russkogo jazyka i drugix slavjanskix narečij. St. Petersburg.

Tambovtsev Yu. (rev.). 2005. Gennadij Prokop’evich Mel’nikov, Sistemnaja tipologija jazykov: Printsipy, metody, modeli. Moskva: Nauka, 2003. 395 pp. – Word 56.1: 139–147.

Tchekhoff C. 1978. Aux fondements de la syntaxe: l’ergatif. Paris.

Tchekhoff C. 1979. From ergative to accusative in Tongan: An example of synchronic dynam­ics. – Plank F. (ed.). Ergativity. Toward a theory of grammatical relations. London: 407–418.

Trudgill P. 1992. Dialect typology and social structure. – Jahr E.H. (ed.). Language contact: Theoretical and empirical studies. Berlin, New York: 195–211.

Trudgill P. 1996. Dialect typology: Isolation, social network and phonological structure. – Guy G.R., Feagin C., Schiffrin D., Baugh J. (eds.). Towards a social science of language. [vol. 1: Variation and change in language and society]. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: 3–21.

Trudgill P. 1997. Typology and sociolinguistics: Linguistic structure, social structure and explanatory comparative dialectology. – Folia Linguistica 31.3/4: 349–360.

Trudgill P. 2010. Contact and sociolinguistic typology. – Hickey R. (ed.). The handbook of language contact. Malden (MA): 299–319.

Trudgill P. 2011. Sociolinguistic typology. Oxford.

Wahlström M. 2015. The loss of case inflection in Bulgarian and Macedonian. Helsinki.

Wright W. 1967. A grammar of the Arabic language. [2 vols.]. Cambridge.

Zubkova L.G. 1977. Segmentnaja organizacija slova. Moscow.

Zubkova L.G. 1989. Lingvističeskie učenija konca XVIII–načala XX v.: Razvitie obščej teorii jazyka v sistemnyx koncepcijax. Moscow.

Zubkova L.G. 1990. Fonologičeskaja tipologija slova. Moscow.

Zubkova L.G. 2010. Princip znaka v sisteme jazyka. Moscow.

Informacje

Informacje: Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 2018, Volume 135, Issue 1, s. 81 - 96

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:

THE CORRELATION OF LINGUISTIC PATTERNING AND SOCIETAL STRUCTURES IN SYSTEMIC TYPOLOGY

Angielski:

THE CORRELATION OF LINGUISTIC PATTERNING AND SOCIETAL STRUCTURES IN SYSTEMIC TYPOLOGY

Autorzy

Pace University, New York

Publikacja: 22.03.2018

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND  ikona licencji

Udział procentowy autorów:

Andrii Danylenko (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Angielski