Bednarek M. 2006. Evaluation in media discourse. New York, London.

Bondi M. 2005. Metadiscursive practices in academic discourse: Variation across genres and disciplines. –Bamford J., Bondi M. (eds.). Dialogue within discourse communities. Metadiscursive perspectives on academic genres. Tubingen: 3–29.

Butler Ch. 1985. Statistics in linguistics. Oxford.

Conrad S., Biber D. 2000. Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. – Hunston S., Thompson G. (eds.). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: 56–73.

De Carvalho G. 2001. Rhetorical patterns of academic book reviews written in Portuguese and in English. – Iglesias L. Rabade, Doval Suarez S.M. (eds.). Studies in contrastive linguistics. 2nd International Contrastive Linguistics Conference. Santiago de Compostela: 261–268.

Diani G. 2009. Reporting and evaluation in English book review articles: A cross-disciplinary study. – Hyland K., Diani G. Academic evaluation. Review genres in university settings. Basingstoke: 87–104.

Giannoni D. 2006. Expressing praise and criticism in economic discourse: A comparative analysis of English and Italian book reviews. – Del Lungo Camiciotti G., Dossena M. (eds.). Variation in business and economic discourse. Diachronic and genre perspectives. Rome: 126–138.

Giannoni D. 2010. Mapping academic values in the disciplines. A corpus-based approach. Bern.

Hunston S. 1994. Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse. – Coulthard M. (ed.). Advances in written text analysis. London: 191–218.

Hunston S. 2010. Appraising research. Evaluation in academic writing. Basingstoke.

Hunston S., Thompson G. 2000. Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford.

Hyland K., Tse P. 2004. Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. – Applied Linguistics 25.2: 156–177.

Krzeszowski T.P. 1997. Angels and devils in hell. Elements of axiology in semantics. Warszawa.

Lorés-Sanz R. 2012. Local disciplines, local cultures: Praise and criticism in British and Spanish history book reviews. – Brno Studies in English 38.2: 97–116.

Martin J.R., White P.R.R. 2005. The language of evaluation. Appraisal in English. Basingstoke.

Motta-Roth D. 1998. Discourse analysis and academic book reviews: A study of text and disciplinary cultures. – Fortanet I., Posteguillo S., Palmer J.C., Coll J.F. (eds.). Genre studies in English for academic purposes. Castelló de la Plana: 29–58.

Puzynina J. 1992. Język wartości. Warszawa.

Römer U. 2005. This seems somewhat counterintuitive, though… Negative evaluation in linguistic book reviews by male and female. – Tongini-Bonelli T., Del Lungo Camiciotti G. (eds.). Strategies in academic discourse. Amesterdam: 97–115.

Salager-Meyer F., Alcaraz Ariza M.A., Pabón Berbesí M. 2007. Collegiality, critique and the construction of scientific argumentation in medical book reviews: A diachronic approach. – Journal of Pragmatics 39.10: 1758–1774.

Scott M. 2012. WordSmith tools version 6. Stroud.

Suárez L., Moreno A.I. 2006. The rhetorical structure of academic journal book reviews: A cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary approach. [Online document retrieved from https://www.unizar.es/aelfe2006/ALEFE06/1.discourse/28.pdf ].

Suárez-Tejerina L. 2005. Is evaluation structure-bound? An English-Spanish contrastive study of book reviews. – Tongini-Boneli E., Del Lungo Camiciotti G. (eds.). Strategies in academic discourse. Philadelphia.

Swales J.M. 1990. Genre analysis. Cambridge.

Swales J.M., Burke A. 2003. It’s really fascinating work: Differences in evaluative adjectives across academic registers. – Leistyna P., Meyer Ch. (eds.). Corpus analysis. Language structure and language use. Amsterdam: 1–18.

Thetela P. 1997. Evaluated entities and parameters of values in academic research articles. – English for Specific Purposes 16.2: 101–118.

Thompson G., Hunston S. 2000. Evaluation: An introduction. – Hunston S., Thompson G. 2000. Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: 1–27.

Tse P., Hyland K. 2009. Discipline and gender: Constructing rhetorical identity in book reviews. – Hyland K., Diani G. (eds.). Academic evaluation: Review genres in university settings. London: 105–121.

Valor G.M.L. 2000. A pragmatic approach to politeness and modality in the book reviews articles. València.