Motility i kosmpolityczny wymiar transnarodowych związków na odległość
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEMotility i kosmpolityczny wymiar transnarodowych związków na odległość
Data publikacji: 28.06.2019
Prace Etnograficzne, 2019, Tom 47, Numer 1, s. 37 - 54
https://doi.org/10.4467/22999558.PE.19.003.11321Autorzy
Motility i kosmpolityczny wymiar transnarodowych związków na odległość
Motility and the Cosmopolitan Dimension of Transnational Long-distance Relationships
In the times of emphasized fluidification mobility becomes self-evident and naturalized, though socially desirable and anticipated. By following research participant strategies and practices, this paper analyzes the meaning of terms such as privileged and naturalized mobility, cosmopolitanism and transnationalism, and shows its multi-dimensional character. Based on the author’s ethnographic fieldwork conducted in 2016–2018 among young, educated and highly mobile Poles and foreigners who live in transnational long-distance relationships and an auto-ethnographic perspective, this article examines the notions of motility, cosmopolitanism and transnationalism and shows how mobility is rooted in their everyday lives. In this specific ethnographic context, transnational longdistance relationship is a verification tool of interlocutor practices and cultural competence that are needed to maintain the relation in the times of individualizing modernity.
Bauman Z.
2000 Liquid Modernity, Cambridge.
2003 Liquid Love. On the Frailty of Human Bounds, Cambridge.
Bhabha H.
1996 Unsatisfied: Notes on Vernacular Cosmopolitanism, w: L. Garcia-Morena, P.C. Pfeifer (eds.), Text and Nation: Cross-Disciplinary Essays on Cultural and National Identities, London, s. 191–207.
Blokland T.
2003 Urban Bonds, Cambridge.
Bourdieu P.
1984 Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Cambridge.
Castells M.
2007 Społeczeństwo sieci, przeł. M. Marody, K. Pawluś, J. Stawiński, S. Szymański, Warszawa.
Clifford J.
1995 O autorytecie etnograficznym, przeł. J. Iracka, S. Sikora, „Konteksty. Polska Sztuka Ludowa”, nr 49 (3–4), s. 230–231.
Cohen R.
1996 Diasporas and the Nation-State: From Victims to Challengers, „International Affairs”, nr 72 (3), s. 507–520.
Fischer E.F.
2014 The Good Life: Aspiration, Dignity, and the Anthropology of Wellbeing, Stanford.
Giddens A.
1992 The Transformation of Intimacy, Cambridge.
Glick Schiller N.
2012 The Transnational Migration Paradigm. Global Perspectives on Migration Research, w: D. Halm, Z.S. Abingdon (eds.), Migration and Organized Civil Society. Rethinking National Policy, New York, s. 25–43.
Hannerz U.
1990 Cosmopolitans and Locals in World Culture, „Theory Culture Society”, nr 7, s. 237–251.
Harvey D.
1990 The Condition of Postmodernity, Oxford.
Held D.
1995 Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance, Stanford.
Kaufmann V., Bergman M.M., Joye D.
2004 Motility: Mobility as Capital, „International Journal of Urban and Regional Research”, nr 28 (4), s. 745–756.
Kesselring S.
2006 Pioneering Mobilities – New Patterns of Movement and Motility in a Mobile World, „Environment and Planning” A, nr 38, s. 269–279.
Levitt P., Glick Schiller N.
2004 Conceptualizing Simultaneity: A Transnational Social Field Perspective on Society, „International Migration Review”, nr 38 (3), s. 1002–1039.
Noble G.
2009 Everyday Cosmopolitanism and the Labour of Intercultural Community, w: A. Wise, S. Velayutham (eds.), Everyday Multiculturalism, Basingstoke, s. 47–67.
Nowicka M., Rovisco M.
2009 Introduction: Making Sense of Cosmopolitanism, w: M. Nowicka, M. Rovisco (eds.), Cosmopolitanism in Practice, London–New York, s. 1–16.
Robbins B.
1992 Comparative Cosmopolitanism. Social Text, JSTOR, 31 (32), s. 169–186, www.jstor.org/stable/466224 (dostęp: 22.11.2019).
Vertovec S.
2006 Fostering Cosmopolitanisms: A Conceptual Survey and a Media Experiment in Berlin, w: A. Dallmann, G. Lenz, F. Ulfers (eds.), Toward a New Metropolitanism: Reconstituting Public Culture, Urban Citizenship, and the Multicultural Imaginery in New York and Berlin, Heidelberg, s. 277–298.
2009 Transnationalism, London.
2012 Transnarodowość, przeł. I. Kołbon, Kraków.
Vertovec S., Cohen R.
2002 Introduction: Conceiving Cosmopolitanis, w: S. Vertovec, R. Cohen (eds.), Theory, Context and Practice, Oxford, s. 1–23.
Werbner P.
1999 Global Pathways: Working Class Cosmopolitans and the Creation of Transnational Ethnic Worlds, „Social Anthropology”, nr 7 (1), s. 17–35.
Werbner P.
2008 Introduction: Towards a New Cosmopolitan Anthropology, w: P. Werbner (ed.), Anthropology and the New Cosmopolitanism: Rooted, Feminist and Vernacular Perspectives, New York, s. 1–30.
Wessendorf S.
2010 Commonplace Diversity: Social Interactions in a Super-Diverse Context, MMG Working Papers WP 10–11, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Göttingen, s. 1–36.
Informacje: Prace Etnograficzne, 2019, Tom 47, Numer 1, s. 37 - 54
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Motility i kosmpolityczny wymiar transnarodowych związków na odległość
Motility and the Cosmopolitan Dimension of Transnational Long-distance Relationships
Uniwersytet Warszawski, ul. Krakowskie Przedmieście 30, 00-927 Warszawa, Polska
Publikacja: 28.06.2019
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
PolskiLiczba wyświetleń: 1616
Liczba pobrań: 1180