FAQ

Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa

Law and Collective Identity. Religious Freedom in the Public Sphere

Data publikacji: 05.07.2017

Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa, Tom 10 (2017), Tom 10, Zeszyt 1, s. 169 - 180

https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.17.010.6800

Autorzy

Franciszek Longchamps de Bérier
Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, Polska, ul. Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Abstrakt

Does religion represent a threat to public life and freedom of individuals or perhaps an opportunity for integral development that stems from care for the state as the common good? Christianity does not regard faith as a private matter. It must enjoy freedom in the public sphere. Therefore, assuming that state regulations have no concealed or overtly anti-religious bias, they are certain to entail endeavours to set the barely definable boundaries of the permissible and the impermissible. Richard John Neuhaus proved that the naked square is an illusion, an imposture rather than an opportunity or a decent objective. Public life, as any other kind of existence, abhors vacuum. The calls for confining religion to the private sphere are always to be a failure for the health of the public life. The freedom of religion, as any other freedom, is a challenge that requires defense and price to be paid by nations and individuals. The specific and true cases demonstrate that the numerous antireligious metaphors are not matched by the actual experience. The US Supreme Court decision in Zubik v. Burwell is thoroughly discussed below to give a clear and the most recent example of complexity of both the issue and possible ways of resolving controversies on various aspects of religious freedom.
 

Bibliografia

Brague R., Europa. Droga rzymska [Europe, the Roman Road], transl. by W. Dłuski, Warszawa 2012.

Dziadzio A., Die Angelegenheiten aus Galizien in der Rechsprechung der osterreichischen Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit im 19. und 20. [in:] Rechtsprechung in Osteuropa. Studien zum
19. und fruhen 20. Jahrhundert. Rechtskulturen des modernen Osteuropa. Traditionen und Transfers. Herausgegeben von Zoran Pokrovac
, Band 6.1, Frankfurt am Main 2012, pp. 475–539.

Dziadzio A., Monarchia konstytucyjna w Austrii (1867‒1914). Władza ‒ obywatel ‒ prawo [Constitutional Monarchy in Austria (1867‒1914). Authority v. Citizen v. Law], Kraków 2001.

Epps G., The U.S. Supreme Court’s Nonsense Ruling in Zubik, “The Atlantic” 16.05.2016, http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/05/the-supreme-courts-non-sensical-ruling-in-zubik/
482967/ (access: 10.12.2016).

Giaro T., Legal tradition of Eastern Europe. Its rise and demise, “Comparative Law Review” 2011, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1–23.

Karłowicz D., Ta karczma Rzym się nazywa [The Name of the Inn is Rome], “Teologia Polityczna” 2015‒2016, No. 8, pp. 15–26.

Longchamps de Bérier F., Church-State Relations: Separation without the Wall, “Studia Iuridica” 1995, No. 30, pp. 61–92.

Longchamps de Bérier F., Polityczny podział wzdłuż linii podziału religijnego? Dwa nowe orzeczenia Sądu Najwyższego Stanów Zjednoczonych [A Political Division along Religious Lines? Two New Rulings by the Supreme Court of the United States], “Forum Prawnicze” 2014, No. 2, pp. 3–15.

 

Neuhaus R.J., The Naked Public Square. Religion and Democracy in America, Grand Rapids, MI, 1984.

O wolność słowa i religii. Praktyka i teoria [For the Freedom of Speech and Religion. Praxis and Theory], F. Longchamps de Bérier, K. Szczucki (eds.), Warszawa 2016.

Volokh E., Prof. Michael McConnell on Zubikv.Burwell(Yesterday’s Supreme Court RFRA/Contraceptive Decision), “The Washington Post” 17.05.2016, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/05/17/prof-michael-mcconnell-on-zubik-v-burwell-yesterdays-supreme-court-rfra-contraceptive-decision/?utm_term=.6399f52e1ca5 (access: 10.12.2016).

Weiler J.H.H., Państwo i Naród, kościół, meczet, synagoga. Nieunikniona debata [State and Nation; Church, Mosque and Synagogue. The Debate that Won’t Go Away], “Forum Prawnicze” 2011, No. 1, pp. 37–45.

Informacje

Informacje: Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa, Tom 10 (2017), s. 169 - 180

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Angielski:

Law and Collective Identity. Religious Freedom in the Public Sphere

Autorzy

Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, Polska, ul. Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków

Publikacja: 05.07.2017

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND  ikona licencji

Udział procentowy autorów:

Franciszek Longchamps de Bérier (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Angielski

Liczba wyświetleń: 1535

Liczba pobrań: 811