Animating the Past: History-Making, Memory-Making, Law-Making
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEAnimating the Past: History-Making, Memory-Making, Law-Making
Data publikacji: 2023
Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa, Tom 16 (2023), Tom 16, Zeszyt 3, s. 297 - 316
https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.23.021.18385Autorzy
Animating the Past: History-Making, Memory-Making, Law-Making
This paper examines certain history-making and memory-making practices that allow us to see how the past may be animated. These practices are: first, the Ancient Greek sophistic arts, as exemplified by Gorgias’s Encomium of Helen, and as revived, in dialogue form, in Renaissance humanism; and second, Ancient Greek, Ancient Roman, and medieval memory arts, with particular attention to the composite generative imagery of those arts. Animating the past – as these practices of history-making and memory-making do – is of great epistemic and political value to communities: it enables acts of argument and judgement, and, more generally, it is vital for vibrant democracies. The paper signals, albeit only briefly, how these practices are also intertwined with legal history, and in particular the history of legal reasoning, suggesting some ways forward, in future work, for investigating the entangled histories of history-making, memory-making, and law-making.
Primary sources
Gorgias [Gorg.]. Encomium. Transl. Douglas Maurice MacDowell. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press, 1982.
Lucian. True History. Transl. Diskin Clay. Ed. James H. Brusuelas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
Prudentius [Prudent.]. Psychomachia [Opera]. Ed. and transl. René Braun. Turnhout: Brepols, 1976.
Rhetorica ad Herennium [Rhet. Her.]. Transl. Harry Caplan. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1954.
Studies
Attwill, Jenny. Rhetoric Reclaimed: Aristotle and the Liberal Arts Tradition. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2009.
Boyarin, Daniel. Socrates and the Fat Rabbis. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2009.
Branham, R. Bracht. Unruly Eloquence: Lucian and the Comedy of Traditions. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1989.
Burrow, John W. A History of Histories: Epics, Chronicles, Romances and Inquiries from Herodotus and Thucydides. London: Allen Lane, 2007.
Carruthers, Mary. The Book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008 [1990].
Carruthers, Mary. The Craft of Thought: Meditation, Rhetoric, and the Making of Images, 400‒1200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Consigny, Scott. Gorgias: Sophist and Artist. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2001.
Copeland, Rita. Emotion and the History of Rhetoric in the Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
Cox, Virginia. The Renaissance Dialogue: Literary Dialogue in its Social and Political Contexts, Castiglione to Galileo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Del Mar, Maksymilian. “Enthymising”. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 43, issue 1 (2022): 202–20.
Del Mar, Maksymilian. “The confluence of rhetoric and emotion: How the history of rhetoric illuminates the theoretical importance of emotion”. Law & Literature (2022): 1–29 (online first; accessed: 1.06.2023). DOI: 10.1080/1535685X.2022.2115651.
Fredal, James. The Enthymeme: Syllogism, Reasoning, and Narrative in Ancient Greek Rhetoric. Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press, 2020.
Jarratt, Susan. Re-Reading the Sophists: Classical Rhetoric Refigured. Carbondale‒Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 1991.
Marr, Alexander, Garrod, Raphael, Marcaida, José Ramon, and Oosterhoof, Richard J. Logodeadeus: Word Histories of Ingenuity in Early Modern Europe. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2018.
Marsh, David. Lucian and the Latins: Humour and Humanism in the Early Renaissance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998.
Marsh, David. The Quattrocento Dialogue: Classical Tradition and Humanist Innovation. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980.
Robinson, Benedict. Passion’s Fictions from Shakespeare to Richardson: Literature and the Sciences of the Soul and Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
Roth, Paul. The Philosophical Structure of Historical Explanation. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2019.
Sprague, Rosamond. “Dissoi Logoi or Dialexeis”. Mind 77, no. 306 (1968): 155–67.
Struever, Nancy. The Language of History in the Renaissance. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970.
Thein, Karel. Ecphrastic Shields in Graeco-Roman Literature: The World’s Forge. Image, Text, and Culture in Classical Antiquity. Abingdon: Routledge, 2022.
Tompkins, Jane. “The reader in history: The changing shape of literary response”. In: Reader-Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism, ed. Jane Tompkins, 201–31. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.
Webb, Ruth. Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice. London: Routledge, 2009.
Yates, Frances. The Art of Memory. London: The Bodley Head, 2014 [1966].
Informacje: Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa, Tom 16 (2023), Tom 16, Zeszyt 3, s. 297 - 316
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Animating the Past: History-Making, Memory-Making, Law-Making
Animating the Past: History-Making, Memory-Making, Law-Making
Publikacja: 2023
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
AngielskiLiczba wyświetleń: 651
Liczba pobrań: 263
Sugerowane cytowania: Chicago