FAQ

Criticism and Silencing in Academia: The Ambivalence of Feedback

Publication date: 21.12.2020

Zoon Politikon, 2020, 11/2020, pp. 257 - 280

https://doi.org/10.4467/2543408XZOP.20.009.13223

Authors

Martin Lenz
University of Groningen, Faculty of Philosophy, Groningen, The Netherlands
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9342-6075 Orcid
All publications →

Titles

Criticism and Silencing in Academia: The Ambivalence of Feedback

Abstract

While criticism of management and other authorities might sometimes count as virtuous, it is often taken as a disturbance of business operations. Some people even think that criticism reflects badly on managers, as it supposedly shows that they do not have sufficient control over their employees. As I see it, then, feedback or criticism is framed in a highly ambivalent way: Although criticism is often invited as an opportunity for improvement, it is mostly received as a cause of reputational damage. A straightforward illustration of this fact is the treatment of so-called whistle blowers who might be viewed either as martyrs exposing problems to be addressed or as traitors revealing failings or misconduct. Yet, given the moral and institutional stakes in improving a problematic situation, it is still surprising that a portrayal of criticism as a disturbance is so often successful. So how is it possible to obscure the obvious downsides of shunning criticism? Zooming in on the ambivalent values associated with criticism, I shall argue that administrative hierarchies and distributions of tasks often provide incentives to suppress criticism and, by extension, collective action rooted in criticism of authorities in academia.

References

Aquino, K., Grover, S., Goldman, B., Folger, R. (2003). When Push doesn't Come to Shove: Interpersonal Forgiveness in Workplace Relationships. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12. 209-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492603256337

Bollen, K., Hoyle, R. (1990). Perceived Cohesion: A Conceptual and Empirical Examination. Social Forces, 69(2). 479-504. https://doi.org/10.2307/2579670

Davies, D. (2003, 18 July). Snitch!. Crooked Timber Blog. https://crookedtimber.org/2003/07/18/snith/ [November 20, 2020]

Enders, J., Westerheijden, D. (2017). The Dutch way of New Public Management. Policy and Society, 33(3), 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.07.004

Erickson, M., Hanna, P., Walker, C. (2020). The UK higher education senior management survey: a statactivist response to managerialist governance. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1712693

Fredricks, S., Ramsey, M., Hornett, A. (2010). Kinship and Bystander Effect. Journal of Religion and Business, 2.

Gilbert, D. (2020, 21 January). Trump just called climate scientists ‘foolish fortune tellers’. Vice News. https://www.vice.com/en/article/3a8dz8/trump-just-called-climate-scientists-foolish-fortunetellers [November 20, 2020]

Graham-Leigh, E. (2020, 20 January). SOAS just sacked effectively sacked all of its casualised staff in one go. Counterfire. https://www.counterfire.org/news/20841-soas-just-effectively-sacked-allof-its-casualised-academic-staff-in-one-go [November 20, 2020]

Herzog, L. (2017). What’s wrong with managerialism? Work hierarchies and control from a relational egalitarian perspective (unpublished manuscript).

Ivancheva, M. (2018). At Stake Is the Future of Public Higher Education Interview of D. Nehring with Mariya Ivancheva. Social Science Space Blog. https://www.academia.edu/36550805/At_Stake_is_the_Future_of_Public_Higher_Education_Interview_
of_Daniel_Nehring_with_Mariya_Ivancheva [November 20, 2020]

Kleinig, J. (2017). Loyalty. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/e.ntries/loyalty/#WhisBlow [November 20, 2020]

Lenz, M. (2020, 8 January). The adversarial culture in philosophy does not serve the truth. Aeon Magazine. https://aeon.co/ideas/the-adversarial- culture-in-philosophy-does-not-serve-the-truth [November 20, 2020]

Lenz, M. (2019, 22 January). Silent academics and the decline of (higher) education. Handling Ideas Blog. https://handlingideas.blog/2020/01/22/silent-academics-and-the-decline-of-higher-education/[November 20, 2020]

Levy, J. (2020, 29 November). Is virtue signalling a perversion of morality.Aeon Magazine. https://aeon.co/ideas/is-virtue-signalling-aperversion-of-morality [November 20, 2020]

Lupton, B., Warren, R. (2016). Managing without blame? Journal of Business Ethics, 152. 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3276-6

Matthews, D. (2020, 17 September). Dutch education minister wants academics to have weekends. Inside Higher Education. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/09/17/dutch-education-minister-wants-academics-have-weekends [November 20, 2020]

McKie, A. (2020, 20 January). Casualised staff ‘dehumanised’ in UK universities. Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/casualised-staff-dehumanised-uk-universities [November 20, 2020]

NL Times (2019, 15 May). Change the way money is distributed among universities. https://nltimes.nl/2019/05/15/change-way-moneydistributed-among-universities-technical-universities-govt-advice [November 20, 2020]

Robeyns, I. (2019, 15 March). Lessons from Dutch academic activism. Crooked Timber Blog. https://crookedtimber.org/2019/03/15/lessons-from-dutch-academic-activism-part-1/ [November 20, 2020]

Robeyns, I. (2020, 20 January). The consequences of overtime in Dutch academia. Crooked Timber Blog. https://crookedtimber.org/2020/01/20/the-consequences-of-overtime-in-dutch-academia/ [November 20, 2020]

Weinberg, J. (2017, 11 April). UC Berkeley knew of prior complaints about Searle. Daily Nous Blog. http://dailynous.com/2017/04/11/uc-berkeley-knew-prior-complaints-searle/ [November 20, 2020]

What is it like to be a woman in philosophy Blog. https://beingawomaninphilosophy. wordpress.com/ [December 16, 2020]

van der Werfhorst, H. (2019). Are Universities Left-Wing Bastions? The political orientation of professors, professionals, and managers in Europe. The British Journal of Sociology, 71(1). 47-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12716 VSNU (n.d.). Dalende rijksbijdrage. https://vsnu.nl/dalende-rijksbijdrage.html [November 20, 2020]

Information

Information: Zoon Politikon, 2020, 11/2020, pp. 257 - 280

Article type: Original article

Titles:

Polish:

Criticism and Silencing in Academia: The Ambivalence of Feedback

English:

Criticism and Silencing in Academia: The Ambivalence of Feedback

Authors

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9342-6075

Martin Lenz
University of Groningen, Faculty of Philosophy, Groningen, The Netherlands
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9342-6075 Orcid
All publications →

University of Groningen, Faculty of Philosophy, Groningen, The Netherlands

Published at: 21.12.2020

Article status: Open

Licence: CC BY-SA  licence icon

Percentage share of authors:

Martin Lenz (Author) - 100%

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

English