Bachryj-Krzywaźnia, M. (2016a). “Filozoficzne ramy i przesłanki zróżnicowania podejścia interpretacjonistycznego”. Wrocławskie Studia Politologiczne, 21, pp. 7–23.

Bachryj-Krzywaźnia, M. (2016b). “Interpretacjonizm narratywistyczny: filozoficzna geneza, założenia metodologiczne i potencjał analityczny”. In: Ł. Dulęba,

J. Wiśniewski (eds.). Liberalizm i teoria polityczna. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe WNPiD UAM, pp. 127–146.

Bevir, M. (2010a). “Editor’s Introduction: Interpretive Political Science”. In: M. Bevir (ed.). Interpretive Political Science. Vol. 1: Interpretive Theories. Los Angeles [etc.]: Sage Publications, pp. xxi–xlii.

Bevir, M. (2010b). “Introduction: Interpretive Methods”. In: M. Bevir (ed.). Interpretive Political Science. Vol. 2: Interpretive Methods. Los Angeles [etc.]: Sage Publications, pp. vii–xx.

Bevir, M. (ed.). (2010a). Interpretive Political Science. Vol. 1: Interpretive Theories. Los Angeles [etc.]: Sage Publications.

Bevir, M. (ed.). (2010b). Interpretive Political Science. Vol. 2: Interpretive Methods. Los Angeles [etc.]: Sage Publications.

Bevir, M. (ed.). (2010c). Interpretive Political Science. Vol. 3: Interpreting Politics. Los Angeles [etc.]: Sage Publications.

Bevir, M. (ed.). (2010d). Interpretive Political Science. Vol. 4: Interpreting Policies. Los Angeles [etc.]: Sage Publications.

Bevir, M., Rhodes, R.A.W. (2002). “Interpretive Theory”. In: Theory and Methods in Political Science. [Online]. Available from: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0bk3k2nq#author. [Accessed: 29 September 2019].

Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles: Sage.

Crotty, M.J. (1998). The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. 1st ed. London–Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.

Fairclough, N. (2011). Critical Discourse Analysis in a Time of Crisis. [Online]. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/3776000/Critical_Discourse_Analysis_in_a_Time_of_Crisis_2011_. [Accessed: 15 October 2019].

Filipowicz, S. (2015). “O fundamentalnej roli interpretacji”. Politeja: Pismo Wydziału Studiów Międzynarodowych i Politycznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 12(36), pp. 191–204.

Furlong, P., Marsh, D. (2010). “A Skin, not a Sweater: Ontology and Epistemology in Political Science”. In: D. Marsh, G. Stoker (eds.). Theory and Methods in Political Science. Basingstoke–New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 184–211.

Gibbons, M.T. (2010). “Hermeneutics, Political Inquiry, and Practical Reason: A Evolving Challenge to Political Science”. In: M. Bevir (ed.). Interpretive Political Science. Vol. 2: Interpretive Methods. Los Angeles [etc.]: Sage Publications.

Krauz-Mozer, B. (2005). Teorie polityki: założenia metodologiczne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Marsh, D., Stoker, G. (eds.). (2006). Teorie i metody w naukach politycznych. Krakow: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

Pierzchalski, F. (2013). “Metoda abdukcji oraz jej zastosowanie na gruncie nauki o polityce”. In: B. Krauz-Mozer, P. Ścigaj (eds.). Podejścia badawcze i metodologie w nauce o polityce. Krakow: Księgarnia Akademicka.

Schwandt, T.A. (2010). “Three Epistemological Stances for Qualitative Inquiry: Interpretivism, Hermeneutics, and Social Constructionism”. In: M. Bevir (ed.). Interpretive Political Science. Vol. 1: Interpretive Theories. Los Angeles [etc.]: Sage Publications, pp. 35–71.

Schwartz-Shea, P., Yanow, D. (2012). Interpretive Research Design. 1st ed. New York, NY: Routledge.

Vromen, A. (2010). “Debating Methods: Rediscovering Qualitative Approaches”. In: D. Marsh, G. Stoker (eds.). Theory and Methods in Political Science. Basingstoke–New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 249–266.

Yanow, D., Schwartz-Shea, P. (eds.). (2015). Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. 2nd ed. London–New York: Routledge.