Extended Mind and Patriarchy: Cognitive Interpretation of the Reproduction of Patriarchal System
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEPublication date: 04.12.2024
Teoria Polityki, 2024, Nr 9/2024, pp. 9-25
https://doi.org/10.4467/25440845TP.24.013.20709Authors
Extended Mind and Patriarchy: Cognitive Interpretation of the Reproduction of Patriarchal System
Bimbi, F. (2012). I vocabolari della violenza. Milano: Guerini Scientifica.
Braidotti, R. (2011). “Sexual Difference as a Nomadic Political Project”. In: eadem. Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 137–166.
Brothers, L. (2002). “The Social Brain: A Project for Integrating Primate Behavior and Neurophysiology in a New Domain”. In: J.T. Cacioppo, G. Berntson, R. Adolphs, C. Sue Carter, R.J. Davidson, M.K. McClintock, B.S. McEwen, M.J. Meaney, D.L. Schacter, E.M. Sternberg, S. Suomi, S.E. Taylor (eds.). Foundations in Social Neuroscience. Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 367–385.
Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.W., Zou, J., Saligramma, V., Kalai, A. (2016). “Man Is to Computer Programmer as Woman Is to Homemaker? Debiasing word embeddings”. In: NIPS’16: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 4356–4364.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Il dominio maschile. Milano: Feltrinelli.
Bourdieu, P. (2002). Masculine Domination. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Butler, J. (1992). “Contingent Foundations: Feminism and the Question of ‘Postmodernism’”. In: J. Butler, J.W. Scott (eds.). Feminist Theorize the Political. London–New York: Routledge, pp. 3–22.
Bunge, M. (2010). “Minding Matter: The Plastic Brain”. In: idem. Matter and Mind: A Philosophical Inquiry. Dordrecht: Springer.
Cacioppo, J.T., Berntson, G.G., Sheridan, J.F., McClintock, M.K. (2002). “Multilevel Integrative Analyses of Human Behavior: Social Neuroscience and the Complementing Nature of Social and Biological Approaches”. In: J.T. Cacioppo, G.G. Berntson, R. Adolphs et al. Foundations in Social Neuroscience. Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 21–46.
Clark, A., Chalmers, D.J. (2010). “The Extended Mind”. In: R. Menary (ed.). The Extended Mind. Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 27–42.
Connell, R. (2009). Gender: In World Perspective. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Crenshaw, K. (2008). “The Curious Resurrection of First Wave Feminism in the U.S. Elections. An Intersectional Critique of the Rhehoric of Solidarity and Betrayal”. In: L. Gunnarsson (ed.). Proceedings from GEXcel Theme 1: Gender, Sexuality and Global Change. Available at: http://oru.divaportal.org/smash/get/diva2:137683/FULLTEXT02.pdf.
Crawford, K. (2016). “Can an Algorithm Be Agonistic? Ten Scenes from Life in Calculated Publics”. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(1), pp. 77–92.
Devereaux, M. (1995). “Oppressive Texts, Resisting, Readers, and The Gendered Spectator: The ‘New’ Aesthetic”. In: P.Z. Brand, C. Korsmeyer (eds.). Feminism and Tradition in Aesthetics. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 121–141.
Di Meco, L., Apolito, N. (2023). Armi di reazione e odio. Disinformazione di genere, misoginia e abusi online contro le donne in politica in Italia. Available at: https://she-persisted.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/ShePersisted_Italy.pdf.
Duelli Klein, R. (1983). “How to Do What We Want to Do: Thoughts about Feminist
Methodology”. In: G. Bowles, R. Duelli Klei. Theories of Women’s Studies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Emerson Dobash, R., Dobash, R. (1979). Violence Against Wives: A Case Against the Patriarchy. New York: The Free Press.
FRA – European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2022). Bias in Algorithms – Artificial Intelligence and Discrimination. Vienna. https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/fra-2022-bias-in-algorithms_en.pdf (accessed: 5.11.2024).
Fromm, E. (1999). Love, Sexuality, and Matriarchy: About Gender. New York: Fromm International Pub.
Gallagher, S., Zahavi, D. (2012). The Phenomenological Mind. New York–London: Routledge.
Harding, S. (1983). “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: ‘What Is Strong Objectivity?’”. In: L. Alcoff, E. Potter (eds.). Feminist Epistemologies. New York–London: Routledge, pp. 49–82.
Harding, S. (2004). The Feminist Standpoint: Theory Reader, Intellectual and Political Controversies. New York: Routledge.
Humm, M. (1993). Słownik teorii feminizmu. Transl. J. Mikos. Warszawa: Semper.
Jaggar, A.M. (2003). “Feminist Politics and Epistemology: The Standpoint of Women”. In: S. Harding (ed.). The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. New York–London: Routledge, pp. 55–66.
Kimmel, M.S. (2000). “Inequality and Difference: The Social Construction of Gender Relation”. In: idem. The Gendered Society. New York: Oxford Univerity Press, pp. 86–110.
Kymlicka, W. (2002). Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lunghi, C. (2002). “La soggettivita delle donne fra femminismo e sociologia”. Studi di Sociologia, 40(2), Aprile–Giugno, pp. 167–188.
Marx, K. (1997). Writings of the Young Marx on Philosophy and Society. Eds. and Transl. D. Easton, K.H. Guddat. New York: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.
Mitchell, J.P., Mason, M.F., Macrae, C.N., Banaji, M.R. (2006). “Thinking about Others: The Neural Substrates of Social Cognition”. In. J.T. Cacioppo, P.S. Visser, C.I. Pickett (eds.). Social Neuroscience: People Thinking about Thinking People. Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 63–82.
National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT, Istituto Nazionale di Statistica) (2023). Stereotipi di genere e immagine sociale della violenza: primi risultati, maggio–luglio 2023. Available at: https://www.istat.it/it/files/2023/11/STAT_TODAY_Stereotipi.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
Noe, A. (2004). Action in Perception. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Okin, S. (1989). Justice: Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Book.
Pierzchalski, F. (2013). “Polityka jako „męskie spojrzenie””. In: B. Kaczmarek (ed.). Metafory polityki, vol. 4. Warszawa: Dom Wydawniczy Elipsa, pp. 239–253.
Pierzchalski, F. (2019). „Splątani w rolach. Przemoc ekonomiczna w polskiej rodzinie jako reprodukcja patriarchalnej asymetrii”. In: J. Ziołkowski, P. Rutkowski (eds.). Oblicza przemocy. Warszawa: Dom Wydawniczy Elipsa, pp. 187–218.
Pisker, B., Dokic, K., Martinovic, M. (2023). “Measuring Search Engine Bias in European Women’s Image Results Using Machine Learning Algorithms”. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org), vol. 3402, paper 8. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3402/paper08.pdf (accessed: 5.11.2024).
Razavi, S. (2013). “Households, Families, and Social Reproduction”. In: G. Waylen, K. Celis, J. Kantola, S.L. Weldon (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 289–312.
Rosi, E. (2020). “Discrimination and Hate and Sexist Speech in the Italian Law”. In: G. Giusti, G. Iannaccaro. Language, Gender and Hate Speech a Multidisciplinary –Quaderni del Comitato Unico di Garanzia dell’Universita Ca’ Foscari Venezia 1, pp. 161–166. https://edizionicafoscari.unive.it/media/pdf/books/978-88-6969-479-0/978-88-6969-479-0-ch-09.pdf (accessed: 5.11.2024).
Rowbotham, S. (1973). Woman’s Consciousness, Man’s World. London: Penguin Books.
Rowlands, M. (2010). The New Science of the Mind: From Extended Mind to Embodied Phenomenology. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Rupert, R.D. (2009). Cognitive Systems and the Extended Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Saraceno, C. (1992). Pluralita e mutamento. Riflessioni sull’identita femminile. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Searle, J.R. (2002). Consciousness and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slaby, J., Choudhury, S. (2012). “Proposal for a Critical Neuroscience”. In: eidem (eds.). Critical Neuroscience: A Handbook of the Social and Cultural Contexts of Neuroscience. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Streeck, J., Goodwin, Ch., LeBaron, C. (2011). “Embodied Interaction in the Material World: An Introduction”. In: eidem. Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–29.
Tesser, A. (1978). “Self-generated Attitude Change”. In: L. Berkowitz (ed.). Advances in Experimental Psychology, vol. 11. New York: Academic Press, pp. 289–338.
Tomasello, M. (1999). The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tong, R. (1995). Feminist Thought. New York–London: Routledge.
Touraine, A. (1997). Critica della modernita. Milano: II Saggiatore.
Williams, B. (2012). Morality: An Introduction to Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, R.J. (2004). Boundaries of the Mind: The Individual in the Fragile Sciences. Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wittig, M. (1993). “One Is Not Born a Woman”. In: H. Abelove, M.A. Barale, D.M. Halperin (eds.). The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader. London–New York: Routledge, pp. 103–109.
Varsha, P.S. (2023). “How Can We Manage Biases in Artificial Intelligence Systems –A Systematic Literature Review”. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 3(1), pp. 100165. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100165.
Zaki, J., Ochsner, K. (2011). “You, Me and My Brain: Self and Other Representations in Social Cognitive Neuroscience”. In: A. Todorov, S.T. Fiske, D.A. Prentice (eds.). Social Neuroscience: Toward Understanding the Underpinnings of the Social Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Information: Teoria Polityki, 2024, Nr 9/2024, pp. 9-25
Article type: Original article
University of Warsaw, Krakowskie Przedmieście 30, 00-927 Warszawa, Poland
University of Molise
Italy
Published at: 04.12.2024
Article status: Open
Licence: CC BY
Percentage share of authors:
Information about author:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
EnglishView count: 106
Number of downloads: 96