FAQ

“Let Us Make ROBOT in Our Image, According to Our Likeness”. An Examination of Robots in Several Science Fiction Films through the Christian Concept of the “Image of God”

Publication date: 17.11.2016

Studia Religiologica, 2016, Volume 49 Issue 3, pp. 219 - 230

https://doi.org/10.4467/20844077SR.16.015.5873

Authors

Fryderyk Kwiatkowski
All publications →

Titles

“Let Us Make ROBOT in Our Image, According to Our Likeness”. An Examination of Robots in Several Science Fiction Films through the Christian Concept of the “Image of God”

Abstract

The paper examines representations of robots in several films: Bicentennial Man (1999), Star Trek: Nemesis (2002) and Chappie (2015) in the light of the Christian concept of imago Dei. According to Victoria Nelson, in the last 50 years artificial intelligence in pop-culture works has frequently been presented as holiness. Her interpretation can be linked with the outcome of research of scholars, who revealed that the Euro-American view on technology is deeply rooted in Christian thought. The author’s main line of argument is embedded in Noreen Herzfeld’s observation, which demonstrated the striking similarities between the relational approach to research into artificial intelligence and the relational interpretation of the notion of imago Dei by Karl Barth. Herzfeld suggests that the robots in the examined films can be viewed through a relational approach to the concept of imago Dei, which entails a relational definition of intelligence.

References

Asprem E., and Granholm K., Introduction, [in:] Contemporary Esotericism, E. Asprem, K. Granholm (eds.), Routledge, London and New York 2013, pp. 1–25.

Barker V., After the Death of God: Postsecularity?, “Journal of Religious History” 2009, 33, no. 1, pp. 82–95.

Barth K., Church Dogmatics III/2. The Doctrine of Creation, G.W. Bromiley, T.F. Torrance, T. and T. Clark (eds.), Edinburgh 1960.

Bjork R.C., Artificial Intelligence and the Soul, “Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith” 2008, 60, no. 2, pp. 95–102.

Brooke J.H., Visions of Perfectibility, “Journal of Evolution & Technology” 2005, 14, no. 2, pp. 1–12.

Castelfranchi C., Modelling Social Action for AI Agents, “Artificial Intelligence” 1998, 103, no. 1–2, pp. 157–182.

Delio I., Artificial Intelligence and Christian Salvation, “New Theology Review” 2003, 16, no. 4, pp. 39–51.

Dennett D.C., Conditions of Personhood, [in:] The Identities of Persons, A.O. Rorty (ed.), University of California Press, Berkeley 1976, pp. 175–196.

Gasser L., Social conceptions of knowledge and action: DAI foundations and open systems semantics, “Artificial Intelligence” 1991, 47, no. 1–3, pp. 107–138.

Geraci R.M., Spiritual Robots: Religion and Our Scientific View of the Natural World, “Theology and Science” 2006, 9, no. 3, pp. 1–16.

———, Robots and the Sacred in Science and Science Fiction: Theological Implications of Artificial Intelligence, “Zygon” 2007, 42, no. 4, pp. 961–980.

Granholm K., and Asprem E., The Secular, the Post-Secular, and the Esoteric in the Public Sphere, [in:] Contemporary Esotericism, K.G. Egil Apsrem (ed.), Routledge, London and New York 2013, pp. 309–329.

Habermas J., Religion in the Public Sphere, “European Journal of Philosophy” 2006, 14, no. 1, pp. 1–25.

———, Notes on Post Secularist Society, “NPQ: New Perspectives Quarterly” 2008, 25, no. 4, pp. 16–29.

Herzfeld N., Creating in Our Own Image: Artificial Intelligence and the Image of God, “Zygon” 2002, 37, no. 2, pp. 303–316.

Hjarvard S., The Mediatization of Religion. theory of the Media as an Agent of Religious Change, 2006, http://oldintranet.oikosnet-europe.eu/Archives/Meetings/Annual_Conferences/Sigtuna_2006
/Download/The mediatization of religion.pdf [accessed 26 December 2015].

Knott K., Cutting Through the Postsecular City: Spatial Interrogation, [in:] Exploring the Postsecular: The Religious, the Political and the Urban, C. Jedan, A.L. Molendijk, J. Beaumont (eds.), Brill, Leiden 2010, pp. 19–38.

Lipowicz M., Od transcendencji człowieka do transgresji człowieczeństwa. Próba filozoficzno-
-socjologicznej konceptualizacji transhumanizmu
, “Ethos” 2015, 111, no. 3, pp. 57–80.

Martin B., Contrasting Modernities: “Postsecular” Europe and Enspirited Latin America, [in:] Exploring the Postsecular: The Religious, the Political and the Urban, C. Jedan, A.L. Molendijk, J. Beaumont (eds.), Brill, Leiden 2010, pp. 63–89.

McLennan G., Spaces of Postsecularism, [in:] Exploring the Postsecular: The Religious, the Political and the Urban, C. Jedan, A.L. Molendijk, J. Beaumont (eds.), Brill, Leiden 2010, pp. 41–62.

Minsky M., Semantic Information Processing, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 1968.

Moberg M., and Granholm K., The Concept of the Post-Secular and the Contemporary Nexus of Religion, Media, Popular Culture, and Consumer Culture, [in:] Post-Secular Society, P. Nynäs, L. Mika, U. Terhi (eds.), Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ 2012, pp. 95–127.

Nelson V., Sekretne życie lalek, transl. A. Kowalcze-Pawlik, Universitas, Kraków 2009.

Noble D., The Religion of Technology: The Divinity of Man and the Spirit of Invention, Penguin Books, New York 1999.

Nye D.E., America as Second Creation: Technology and Narratives of New Beginnings, MIT Press 2003.

Webster C., The Great Instauration: Science, Medicine, and Reform, 1626–1660, Duckworth, London 1976.

Wilson E.G., The Melancholy Android, SUNY Press 2006.

Information

Information: Studia Religiologica, 2016, Volume 49 Issue 3, pp. 219 - 230

Article type: Original article

Titles:

Polish:

“Let Us Make ROBOT in Our Image, According to Our Likeness”. An Examination of Robots in Several Science Fiction Films through the Christian Concept of the “Image of God”

English:

“Let Us Make ROBOT in Our Image, According to Our Likeness”. An Examination of Robots in Several Science Fiction Films through the Christian Concept of the “Image of God”

Published at: 17.11.2016

Article status: Open

Licence: None

Percentage share of authors:

Fryderyk Kwiatkowski (Author) - 100%

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

English