FAQ

Santander Art and Culture Law Review

Search results

simple search

search np. “cognitive architectures” AND 1993-200 NOT Urban
advanced search
ex. 1234-6789
ex. 10.4467/16890027AP.16.022.6009
ex. Uniwersytet Jagielloński

The History of Artistic Freedom as a Legal Standard in Western Culture: An Attempt at Periodization of the Process of Its Formation

Publication date: 12.2021

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2021, 1/2021 (7), pp. 145 - 170

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.21.010.14599

Authors

Mateusz Maria Bieczyński
University of Fine Arts in Poznań
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4108-9449 Orcid
All publications →

Pobierz pełny tekst

Download PDF PDF
Print print Cite cite Share share

Titles

The History of Artistic Freedom as a Legal Standard in Western Culture: An Attempt at Periodization of the Process of Its Formation

Abstract

This article focuses the historical process of a radical reformulation of the mechanisms of legal regulation of creative activity in the field of visual arts on the European continent, beginning from the second commandment in the Old Testament (the prohibition of imaging) to the contemporary constitutional protection rules in place in Europe and the United States (freedom of artistic expression). The study assumes that the transition from the ban on imaging to the freedom of artistic expression was a result of the long-term evolution of social relations, which involved a gradual liberalization of cultural life and the liberation of the sphere of art from the dictates of religion, politics (the State), professional associations, and the rules of the art market. It characterizes specific historical periods which changed the model of regulating culture and art by the State (or religious communities), and proposes a model of periodization of the history of the formation of artistic freedom as a legal standard.

Keywords: art freedom, art and law, art censorship


Historia wolności artystycznej jako norma prawna w kulturze zachodniej – próba periodyzacji procesu jej powstawania

Streszczenie: Artykuł skupia się na historycznym procesie radykalnego przeformułowania mechanizmów prawnych regulacji działalności twórczej w dziedzinie sztuk wizualnych na kontynencie europejskim, począwszy od drugiego przykazania w Starym Testamencie (zakaz obrazowania) po współczesne konstytucyjne zasady ochrony obowiązujące w Europie i Stanach Zjednoczonych (wolność wypowiedzi artystycznej). W opracowaniu przyjmuje się, że przejście od zakazu obrazowania do wolności wypowiedzi artystycznej było wynikiem długofalowej ewolucji stosunków społecznych, która polegała na stopniowej liberalizacji życia kulturalnego i wyzwalaniu sfery sztuki spod dyktatu religii, polityki (państwa), stowarzyszeń zawodowych, zasad rynku sztuki. Opracowanie charakteryzuje poszczególne okresy historyczne, które zmieniły model regulowania kultury i sztuki przez państwo (lub wspólnoty wyznaniowe), a także proponuje model periodyzacji dziejów kształtowania się wolności artystycznej jako normy prawnej.

Keywords

References

Download references
Alexander P.J., The Iconoclastic Council of Saint Sophia (815) and its Definition (Horos), “Dumbarton Oaks Papers” 1953, Vol. 7.
Alföldi A., Die monarchische Repräsentation im römischen Kaiserreiche, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt 1970.
Atkins R., Mintcheva S. (eds.), Censoring Culture: Contemporary Threats to Free Expression, New Press, New York 2006.
Backer E., Art and Visual Culture 1600-1850. Academy to Avant-Garde, Tate, London 2013.
Baranov V.A., Origen and the Iconoclastic Controversy, in: L. Perrone (ed.), Origeniana octava. Origen and the Alexandrian Tradition. Papers of the 8th International Origen Congress, Leu­ven University Press, Leuven 2003.
Barrère Ch., Santagata W., Defining Art: From the Brancusi Trial to the Economics of Artistic Semiotic Goods, “International Journal of Arts Management” 1999, Vol. 1(2).
Battin M.P., Plato on True and False Poetry, “Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism” 1977, Vol. 36(2).
Beckert J., The “Longue Durée” of Inheritance Law: Discourses and Institutional Development in France, Germany, and the United States since 1800, “European Journal of Sociolo­gy / Archives Européennes de Sociologie / Europäisches Archiv für Soziologie” 2007, Vol. 48(1).
Beisel D., Die Kunstfreiheitsgarantie des Grundgesetzes und ihre strafrechtliche Grenzen, De­cker, Berlin 1997.
Bentley L., Art and the Making of Modern Copyright Law, in: D. McClean, K. Schubert, Dear Images: Art, Copyright and Culture, Ridinghouse, London 2002.
Bevan E., Holy Images: An Inquiry into Idolatry and Image-worship in Ancient Paganism and in Christianity, Routledge, London 2014.
Bieczyński M.M., Od zakazu do wolności. Historia prawnej pozytywizacji wolności sztuki [From Prohibition to Freedom. The History of the Legal Positivization of the Freedom of Ar­tistic Creation], Uniwersytet Artystyczny w Poznaniu, Poznań 2017.
Bieczyński M.M., Prawne granice wolności twórczości artystycznej w zakresie sztuk wizualnych [Legal Limits to the Freedom of Artistic Creativity in the Visual Arts], Wolters Kluwer Polska, Warszawa 2011.
Binder S.E., Tertullian, “On Idolatry” and Mishnah “Avodah Zarah”: Questioning the Parting of the Ways between Christians and Jews, Brill, Leiden 2012.
Blaine D.B., On the Laws of Artistic Copyright and Their Defects: For the Use of Artists, Sculptors, Engravers, J. Murray, London 1853.
Boime A., The Cultural Politics of the Art Academy, “The Eighteenth Century” 1994, Vol. 35(3).
Bordwell D., Catechism of the Catholic Church Revised, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Vatican 2006.
Boulègue J., Le blasphème en procès, 1984-2009. L’église et la mosquée contre les libertés, Nova Editions, Paris 2010.
Bracha O., Owning Ideas: A History of Anglo-American Intellectual Property, PhD dissertation, Harvard Law School 2005, https://law.utexas.edu/faculty/obracha/dissertation/  [accessed: 16.04.2021].
Brock B., Der byzantinische Bilderstreit, in: M. Warnke (ed.), Bildersturm. Die Zerstörung des Kunstwerkes, Carl Hanser, München 1973.
Buddensieg T., Gregory the Great, the Destroyer of Pagan Idols. The History of a Medieval Legend Concerning the Decline of Ancient Art and Literature, “Journal of the Warburg and Cour­tauld Institutes” 1965, Vol. 28.
Burkard D., Bildersturm? Die Reformation (en) und die Bilder, in: E. Garhammer (ed.), Bilder­Streit. Theologie auf Augenhöhe, Echter, Würzburg 2007.
Burke J., Changing Patrons. Social Identity and Visual Arts in Renaissance Florence, Pennsylva­nia State University Press, University Park, PA 2004.
Burton H.F., The Worship of the Roman Emperors, “The Biblical World” 1912, Vol. 40(2).
Cameron A., Images of Authority: Elites and Icons in the Late Sixth Century, “Past & Present” 1979, Vol. 84.
Carmilly-Weinberger M., Fear of Art. Censorship and Freedom of Expression in Art, Bowker, New York–London 1986.
Caspar E., Papst Gregor II. und der Bilderstreit, “Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte” 1933, Vol. 52.
Cavarnos C., Plato’s Teaching on Fine Art, “Philosophy and Phenomenological Research” 1953, Vol. 13(4).
Chalupa A., How Did Roman Emperors Become Gods? Various Concepts of Imperial Apotheosis, “Anodos. Studies of the Ancient World” 2006–2007, Vol. 6-7.
Childs E., Big Trouble: Daumier, Gargantua and the Censorship of Political Caricature, “Art Jour­nal” 1992, Vol. 51.
Childs E., The Body Impolitic: Press Censorship and the Caricature of Honore Daumier, in: D. De la Motte, J.M. Przybylski (eds.), Making the News: Modernity and the Mass Media in Nineteenth-century France, University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst 1999.
Clapp J., Art Censorship – A Chronology of Proscribed and Prescribed Art, Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, NJ 1972.
Collier J., Short View of the Immorality and Profaneness of the English Stage, in: J. Kinsley, H. Kinsley (eds.), John Dryden: The Critical Heritage, Routledge, London–New York 1971.
Cooper E., Art, Photography, Copyright: A History of Photographic Copyright 1850-1911, PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge 2011.
Copinger W.A., The Law of Copyright in Works of Literature and Art: Including that of the Drama, Music, Engraving, Sculpture, Painting, Photography and Ornamental and Useful Designs, Stevens and Haynes, London 1870.
Crean P.J., The Stage Licensing Act of 1737, “Modern Philology” 1938, Vol. 35(3).
Crown P., Clothing the Modern Venus: Hogarth and Women’s Dress, in: E. Goodman (ed.), Art and Culture in the Eighteenth Century: New Dimensions and Multiple Perspectives, Associated University Presses, London 2001.
Cuny L., Freedom & Creativity: Defending Art, Defending Diversity, UNESCO, Paris 2020.
Curtis A., God as ‘Judge’ in Ugaritic and Hebrew Thought, in: B. Lindars (ed.), Law and Religion. Essays on the Place of Law in Israel and Early Christianity, Clarke, Cambridge 1988.
Dahm K., Der Schutz des Urhebers durch die Kunstfreiheit, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2012.
David S., Prince of Pleasure. The Prince of Wales and the Making of the Regency, Little, Brown, London 1998.
Davis W.M., Plato on Egyptian Art, “The Journal of Egyptian Archeology” 1979, Vol. 65.
De Vecchi P., Michelangelo’s Last Judgment, in: C. Pietrangeli et al. (eds.), The Sistine Chapel: The Art, the History, and the Restoration, Harmony Books, New York 1986.
Deazley R., On the Origin of the Right to Copy: Charting the Movement of Copyright Law in Eigh­teenth Century Britain (1695-1775), Hart, Portland 2004.
Deliyannis D.M., Agnellus of Ravenna and Iconoclasm: Theology and Politics in a Ninth-Century Historical Text, “Speculum” 1996, Vol. 71(3).
Dessemontet F., Copyright and Human Right, http://www.unil.ch/webdav/site/cedidac/shared/Articles/Copyright%20&%20Human%20Rights.pdf [accessed: 17.05.2019].
Dresdner A., Die Entstehung der Kunstkritik im Zusammenhang der Geschichte des europäischen Kunstlebens, Verlag der Kunst, Dresden 2001.
Dubber M.D., New Historical Jurisprudence: Legal History as Critical Analysis of Law, “Critical Analysis of Law” 2015, Vol. 2.
Elsner J., Iconoclasm as a Discourse: From Antiquity to Byzantium, “The Art Bulletin” 2012, Vol. 94(3).
Fabre C., Les députés inscrivent la « liberté de la création artistique » dans la loi, “Le Monde”, 29 September 2015, http://www.lemonde.fr/arts/article/2015/09/29/les-deputes-inscrivent-la-liberte-de-la-creation-artistique-dans-la-loi_4776846_1655012.html#PmTwzKYptLKXxbar.99 [accessed: 04.01.2017].
Findlen P., Humanism, Politics and Pornography in Renaissance Italy, in: L. Hunt (ed.), The In­vention of Pornography. Obscenity and the Origins of Modernity, 1500-1800, Zone Books, New York 1993.
Firmage E.B., Weiss B.G., Welch J.W. (eds.), Religion and Law – Biblical-Judaic and Islamic Per­spectives, Eisenbrauns, Winona Lake, IN 1990.
Fishwick D., The Imperial Cult in the Latin West: Studies in the Ruler Cult of the Western Provin­ces of the Roman Empire, Brill, Leiden 1987.
Florovsky G., Origen, Eusebius and the Iconoclastic Controversy, “Church History” 1950, Vol. 19(2).
Flower H.I., Rethinking “Damnatio memoriae”: The Case of Cn. Calpurnius Piso Pater in AD 20, “Classical Antiquity” 1998, Vol. 17(2).
Flower H.I., The Art of Forgetting – Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture, The Uni­versity of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill 2006.
Folda J., Byzantine Art and Italian Panel Painting. The Virgin and Child ‘Hodegetria’ and the Art of Chrysography, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2015.
Foster S., Artistic Expression, Public Morality and Article 10 of the European Convention, http://cuba.coventry.ac.uk/humanrights/files/2012/06/free-speech-and-indecency.pdf [accessed: 10.01.2017].
Freedberg D., Art and Iconoclasm, 1525-1580. The Case of the Northern Netherlands, in: J.P. Filedt Kok et al. (eds.), Kunst voor de beeldenstorm, Staatsuitgeverij, s-Graven­hage 1986.
Frimmel S., Kunsturteile: Gerichtsprozesse gegen Kunst in Russland nach der Perestroika, Böhlau Verlag, Köln 2015.
Gibault C., Michel C., Lucas A., Avant-projet de loi relatif à la liberté de la création, à l’architec­ture et au patrimoine, June 2015.
Ginsburg J.C., “Une chose publique”? The Author’s Domain and the Public Domain in Early British, French and US Copyright Law, “The Cambridge Law Journal” 2006, Vol. 65(3).
Goldstein R.J., Censorship of Caricature and the Theater in Nineteenth-century France: An Over­view, “Yale French Studies” 2012, Vol. 122.
Goldstein R.J., Political Censorship of Arts and the Press in Nineteenth-century Europe, St Mar­tin’s Press, New York 1989.
Goldstein R.J., The Frightful Stage. Political Censorship of the Theater in Nineteenth-century Eu­rope, Berghahn Books, New York–Oxford 2009.
Goldstein R.J. (ed.), The War for the Public Mind, Praeger, Westport, CT 2000.
Golomstock I., Totalitarian Art in the Soviet Union, the Third Reich, Fascist Italy and the People’s Republic of China, Collins Harvill, London 1990.
Gregory S., Vasari and the Renaissance Print, Taylor and Francis, London 2012.
Grigg R., Aniconic Worship and the Apologetic Tradition: A Note on Canon 36 of the Council of Elvira, “Church History” 1976, Vol. 45(4).
Gulley N., Plato on Poetry, “Greece & Rome” 1977, Vol. 24(2).
Halliwell S., Plato and Painting, in: N.K. Rutter, B.A. Sparkes (eds.), Word and Image in Ancient Greece, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh 2006.
Händler G., Epochen karolingischer Theologie. Eine Untersuchung über die Karolingischer Gut­achten zum byzantinischen Bilderstreit, Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, Berlin 1958.
Hannoosh M., Baudelaire and Caricature: From the Comic to an Art of Modernity, Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA 1992.
Hatfield R., Review of “The Rise of the Artist in the Middle Ages and Early Renaissance” by Andrew Martindale, “The Art Bulletin” 1975, Vol. 57(4).
Hegenbart S., Does Plato Radically Reject Visual Arts? References to the Epistemological Func­tion of Arts in Plato’s Dialogues, “St. Anne Research STAAR” 2009.
Heinich N., Buren à Paris: minimalisme et politique, in: idem, L’art contemporain exposéaux re­jets: études de cas, J. Chambon, Nimes 1998.
Heins M., The ‘Miracle’ of Burstyn v. Wilson, in: J. Russomanno (ed.), Defending the First: Com­mentary on First Amendment Issues and Cases, Routledge, London 2006.
Hilsdale C.J., Byzantine Art and Diplomacy in an Age of Decline, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2014.
Hoffman Y., The Status of the Decalogue in the Hebrew Bible, in: H. Reventlow, Y. Hoffman (eds.), The Decalogue in Jewish and Christian Tradition, T & T Clark, New York–London 2011.
Holl K., Die Schriften des Epiphanius gegen die Bilderverehrung, in: idem, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Kirchengeschichte, Vol. 2: Der Osten, Mohr, Tübingen 1928.
Hubbart H., William Hogarth, the Founder of the English Painting, “Journal of the Royal Society of Arts” 1932, Vol. 80(4139).
Human Rights Council, Report of the Independent Expert in the Field of Cultural Rights, Farida Shaheed, 21 March 2011, UN Doc. A/HRC/17/38 (2011).
Humphreys M.T.G., Law, Power, and Imperial Ideology in the Iconoclast Era c. 680-850, Oxford, Oxford University Press 2015.
Hunt L., Pornography and the French Revolution, in: eadem (ed.), The Invention of Pornography. Obscenity and the Origins of Modernity, 1500-1800, Zone Books, New York 1993.
Idzerda S.J., Iconoclasm during the French Revolution, “The American Historical Review” 1954, Vol. 60(1).
Inde V.R. (ed.), Art in the Courtroom, Praeger, Westport 1998.
James E.O., Review: “Holy Images: An Inquiry into Idolatry and Image-worship in Ancient Paga­nism and in Christianity”, by Edwyn Bevan (1940), “Man” 1941, Vol. 41.
James L., Seeing is Believing but Words Tell No Lies: Captions Versus Images in the Libri Carolini and Byzantine Iconoclasm, in: A. McClanan, J. Johnson, Negating the Image: Case Studies in Iconoclasm, Routledge, London 2005.
Janssen E., Limits to Expression on Religion in France, “Agama & Religiusitas di Eropa, Journal of European Studies” 2009, Vol. 5(1).
Karelis Ch., Plato on Art and Reality, “The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism” 1979, Vol. 34(3).
Kearns P., Freedom of Artistic Expression: Essays on Culture and Legal Censure, Hart, Oxford 2013.
Kerr D.S., Caricature and French Political Culture 1830-1848: Charles Philipon and the Illustra­ted Press, Clarendon Press, Oxford 2000.
Kessler H.L., Pictorial Narrative and Church Mission in Sixth-century Gaul, “Studies in the Hi­story of Art” 1985, Vol. 16.
Keuls E., Plato on Painting, “The American Journal of Philology” 1974, Vol. 95(2).
Kienzle B., The Clash between Catholics and Cathars over the Veneration of the Cross, in: W.J. van Asselt, P. van Geest, D. Müller (eds.), Iconoclasm and Iconoclash. Struggle for Religious Identity, Brill, Leiden 2007.
Kinservik M.J., Disciplining Satire: The Censorship of Satiric Comedy on the Eighteenth-century London Stage, Associated University Presses, London 2002.
Kitzinger E., The Cult of Images in the Age before Iconoclasm, “Dumbarton Oaks Papers” 1954, Vol. 8.
Knapp M., Cultural Controversies in the West German Public Sphere: Aesthetic Fiction and the Creation of Social Identities, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham 2020.
Kotzur M., Der Europäische Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte: ein regionaler Akteur im Dienste universeller Menschenrechte, in: B. von Hoffmann (ed.), Universalität der Menschenrechte: kulturelle Pluralität, Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M. 2009.
Krannich T., Schubert Ch., Sode C., Die ikonoklastische Synode von Hiereia 754, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2002.
Krueger P., Mommsen T., Meyer P.M., Codex Theodosianus, Weidmann, Hildesheim 1990.
Laaksonen A., Freedom of Expression in the Arts and Media, in: A.J. Wiesand et al. (eds.), Cul­ture and Human Rights: The Wroclaw Commentaries, Wrocław 2016.
Laing G., The Church Fathers and the Oriental Cults, “The Classical Journal” 1918, Vol. 13(4).
Landauer C., Mosaic Imaginings: French Art and Its Revolutions, “Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities” 1995, Vol. 7(2).
Langer L., Religious Offence and Human Rights: The Implications of Defamation of Religions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2014.
Laqueur T.W., The Queen Caroline Affair: Politics as Art in the Reign of George IV, “The Journal of Modern History” 1982, Vol. 54(2).
Lee R.E., Longue Durée and the Status of ‘Superstructures’, in: idem, Longue Durée and World-systems Analysis, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY 2012.
Lenman R.J.V., Art, Society, and the Law in Wilhelmine Germany: The Lex Heinze, “Oxford Ger­man Studies” 1973, Vol. 8.
Lenzerini F., The Culturalization of Human Rights Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2014.
Litz G., Die Problematik der reformatorischen Bilderfrage in den schwäbischen Reichsstädten, “Historische Zeitschrift” 2002, Vol. 33.
Loi n° 2016-925 du 7 juillet 2016 relative à la liberté de la création, à l’architecture et au pa­trimoine [Act No. 2016-925 of 7 July 2016 on Freedom of Creation, Architecture, and Heritage], Journal officiel de la République française 0158, 8 July 2016.
Machado C., Review of Mutilation and Transformation. Damnatio memoriae and Roman Imperial Portraiture, “The Journal of Roman Studies” 2007, Vol. 97.
Merryman J.H., Elsen A.E., Urice S.K., Law, Ethics and the Visual Arts, Kluwer Law Interna­tional, Alphen aan den Rijn 2007.
Meyer H.B., Zur Stellung Alkuins auf dem Frankfurter Konzil (794), “Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie” 1959, Vol. 81.
Mix Y.-G., Kunstfreiheit und Zensur in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, De Gruyter, Berlin 2014.
Morgan M.L., Plato, Inquiry, and Painting, “Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Sci­ence” 1990, Vol. 23(2).
Mulryne J.R., Goldring E., Court Festivals of the European Renaissance: Art, Politics, and Perfor­mance, Ashgate, Aldershot 2002.
Naddaff R., Exiling the Poets: The Production of Censorship in Plato’s Republic, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2002.
Nagel A., The Controversy of Renaissance Art, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2011.
Neil B., The Western Reaction to the Council of Nicaea II, “The Journal of Theological Studies” 2000, Vol. 51(2).
O’Brien D., Censorship of Visual Culture in France 1815-1852, “Yale French Studies” 2012, Vol. 122.
O’Malley J.W., The Council of Trent (1545-63) and Michelangelo’s “Last Judgment” (1541), “Pro­ceedings of the American Philosophical Society” 2012, Vol. 156(4).
O’Meara J., Obscenity in the Supreme Court: A Note on Jacobellis v. Ohio, “Notre Dame Law Review” 1964, Vol. 40(1).
O’Neil R.M., Artistic Freedom and Academic Freedom, “Law and Contemporary Problems” 1990, Vol. 53(3).
Obraz M., Das schweigende Bild und die Aussagekraft des Rezipienten in Bezug auf ästhetische und ethische Werturteile, LIT, Berlin 2006.
Ottley W.Y., An Inquiry into the Origin and Early History of Engraving upon Copper and in Wood, vol. 2, M’Creery, London 1816.
Pacheco F., The Art of Painting (1649), in: J. Cowans (ed.), Early Modern Spain: A Documentary History, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia 2003.
Paleotti G., Discourse on Sacred and Profane Images, Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles 2012.
Petersen L.H., The Presence of ‘Damnatio memoriae’ in Roman Art, “Notes in the History of Art” 2011, Vol. 30(2).
Phillips J., Reformation of Images. Destruction of Art in England, 1535-1660, University of Cali­fornia Press, Berkeley 1973.
Policastro P., Prawa podstawowe w demokratycznych transformacjach ustrojowych. Polski przykład [Fundamental Rights in Democratic Systemic Transformations. The Polish Ex­ample], Wydawnictwo KUL, Lublin 2002.
Polymenopoulou E., Does One Swallow Make a Spring? Artistic and Literary Freedom at the Eu­ropean Court of Human Rights, “Human Rights Law Review” 2016, Vol. 16.
Pon L., Prints and Privileges: Regulating the Image in 16th Century Italy, “Harvard Art Museum Bulletin” 1998, Fall.
Pontynen A., For the Love of Beauty: Art History and the Moral Foundations of Aesthetic Judg­ment, Routledge, London 2006.
Přibáň J., Legal Symbolism: On Law, Time and European Identity, Routledge, London–New York 2007.
Prolingheuer H., Hitlers fromme Bilderstürmer, Dittrich, Köln 2001.
Psychogiopoulou E., The European Union and Cultural Rights, in: A.F. Vrdoljak (ed.), The Cultur­al Dimension of Human Rights, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2013.
Reichardt R., Kohle H., Visualizing the Revolution: Politics and the Pictorial Arts in Late Eigh­teenth Century France, Reaktion Books, London 2008.
Ridder H., Freiheit der Kunst nach dem Grundgesetz, “Schriftenreihe der Internationalen Ge­sellschaft für das Urheberrecht” 1963, Vol. 29.
Sax J.L., Heritage Preservation as a Public Duty: The Abbé Grégoire and the Origins of an Idea, “Michigan Law Review” 1989, Vol. 88.
Sayers D., Article 13 – Freedom of the Arts and Sciences, in: S. Peers et al. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, Hart, Portland 2014.
Schmitter A.M., Representation and the Body of Power in French Academic Painting, “Journal of the History of Ideas” 2002, Vol. 63(3).
Seward D., The Burning of the Vanities: Savonarola and the Borgia Pope, Sutton, Stroud 2006.
Shepherd M.H. Jr., Christology: A Central Problem of Early Christian Theology and Art, in: K. Weitzmann (ed.), Age of Spirituality. A Symposium, Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York 2013.
Shiner L., The Invention of Art: A Cultural History, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2001.
Shoemaker I.H., Broun E., The Engravings of Marcantonio Raimondi, Spencer Museum of Art, University of Kansas, Lawrence 1984.
Steinmann E., Die Sixtinische Kapelle, Bruckmann, München 1905.
Struwe M., Nationalsozialistischer Bildersturm. Funktion eines Begriffs, in: M. Warnke (ed.), Bil­dersturm. Die Zerstörung des Kunstwerkes, Carl Hanser, München 1973.
Talvacchia B., Taking Positions: On the Erotic in Renaissance Culture, Princeton University Press, Princeton 2001.
Taylor L.R., The Divinity of the Roman Emperor, American Philological Association, Middle­town, CT 1931.
Terdiman R., Discourse/Counter-Discourse: The Theory and Practice of Symbolic Resistance in Nineteenth-century France, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY 1989.
Varner E.R., Portraits, Plots, and Politics: “Damnatio memoriae” and the Images of Imperial Wo­men, “Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome” 2001, Vol. 46.
Vasiliev A.A., History of the Byzantine Empire, Vol. 1: 324-1453, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison 1980.
von Becker B., “Gegen Grosz und Genossen” – Der Gotteslästerungsprozess gegen George Grosz, “Neue Juristische Wochenzeitschrift” 2005, Vol. 9.
von Bonsdorff J., Kunstproduktion und Kunstverbreitung im Ostseeraum des Spätmittelalters, Helsinki–Helsingsfors 1993.
von Mickwitz B., Streit um die Kunst. Über das spannungsreiche Verhältnis von Kunst, Öffentlich­keit und Recht. Fallstudien aus dem 19. und 20. Jahrhundert mit dem Schwerpunkt Deutsch­land, Scaneg, München 1996.
Wagner K., von Berg H., Maintz M.L., Verbote (in) der Kunst: Positionen zur Freiheit der Künste von Wagner bis heute, Bärenreiter, Kassel 2019.
Warnke M., Hofkünstler. Zur Vorgeschichte des modernen Künstlers, DuMont, Köln 1996.
Watts O., Daumier and Replacing the King’s Body, in: A. Wagner, R. Sherwin (eds.), Law, Culture and Visual Arts, Springer, New York–London 2014.
Wieruszewski R. et al. (eds.), Mowa nienawiści a wolność słowa. Aspekty prawne i społeczne [Hate Speech and Freedom of Speech. Legal and Social Aspects], Wolters Kluwer Pol­ska, Warszawa 2010.
Wilhelm J., Augsburger Wandmalerei 1368-1530, Mühlberger, Augsburg 1983.
Wronkowska S., Ziembiński Z., Zarys teorii prawa [An Outline of Legal Theory], Ars boni et aequi, Poznań 2001.
Würtenberger T., Rechtliche Grenzen politischer Kunst in historischer Betrachtung, in: H.O. Müh­leisen (ed.), Grenzen politischer Kunst, Schnell & Steiner, München 1982.

Information

Information: Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2021, 1/2021 (7), pp. 145 - 170

Article type: Original article

Titles:

Polish:

The History of Artistic Freedom as a Legal Standard in Western Culture: An Attempt at Periodization of the Process of Its Formation

English:

The History of Artistic Freedom as a Legal Standard in Western Culture: An Attempt at Periodization of the Process of Its Formation

Authors

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4108-9449

Mateusz Maria Bieczyński
University of Fine Arts in Poznań
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4108-9449 Orcid
All publications →

University of Fine Arts in Poznań

Published at: 12.2021

Article status: Open

Licence: CC BY-NC-ND licence icon

Percentage share of authors:

Mateusz Maria Bieczyński (Author) - 100%

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

English

View count: 904

Number of downloads: 1554

<p> The History of Artistic Freedom as a Legal Standard in Western Culture: An Attempt at Periodization of the Process of Its Formation</p>
Download PDF Download xml