At the Borderline of Public and Private Law: The Restitution of Cultural Property Held in Public Collections in Hungary
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEPublication date: 18.12.2024
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2024, 2/2024 (10), pp. 181 - 208
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.24.017.20828Authors
At the Borderline of Public and Private Law: The Restitution of Cultural Property Held in Public Collections in Hungary
During the Second World War, and thereafter until the end of the communist regime in 1989, a massive amount of privately owned works of art came into the possession of the Hungarian state. The ownership of the property thus collected was only partially clarified after the war. After the fall of communism, nationalized cultural property was subject to restitution laws, but restitution typically meant partial compensation. The aim of this article is to highlight the shortcomings that still characterize the restitution of cultural property held in public collections in Hungary. After summarizing the historical-legal situation pertaining to restitution measures in Central and Eastern Europe, we provide a comprehensive overview of the Hungarian legal environment in terms of restitution. The focus is on the restitution rules adopted in the 2010s that were intended to settle the possession of cultural property held in public collections. The roots of constitutional issues related to the regulation arise from and are reflected in the intermingling of private law and public law characteristics and guarantees. In the presentation of civil law disputes concerning the ownership rights of property held in public collections, we outline the characteristics of the Hungarian regulatory framework regarding protected cultural property and the issues arising from their application. Finally, we provide an overview of the European Court of Human Rights’ jurisprudence on the protection of property rights and an assessment of Hungarian regulations before the Court. We claim that the lack of predictability and certainty of the latter authority’s proceedings may lead to human rights issues.
1991. évi XXV. törvény a tulajdonviszonyok rendezése érdekében, az állam által az állampolgárok tulajdonában igazságtalanul okozott károk részleges kárpótlásáról [Act XXV of 1991 on the Partial Compensation for Damages Unjustly Caused by the State to Private Property Owners in Order to Settle Ownership Relations], Magyar Közlöny, 11 July 1991.
1997. évi CXL. törvény a muzeális intézményekről, a nyilvános könyvtári ellátásról és a közművelődésről [Act CXL of 1997 on Museums, Public Libraries and Public Culture], Magyar Közlöny, 15 December 1997.
2001. évi LXIV. törvény a kulturális örökség védelméről [Act LXIV of 2001 on the Protection of Cultural Heritage], Magyar Közlöny, 10 July 2001.
2013. évi CXCV. törvény egyes törvényeknek a közgyűjteményekben őrzött, vitatott tulajdonú kulturális javak visszaadásával összefüggő módosításáról [Act CXCV of 2013 Amending Certain Acts Related to the Restitution of Disputed Cultural Property Held in Public Collections], Magyar Közlöny, 22 November 2013.
2013. évi V. törvény a Polgári Törvénykönyvről [Act V of 2013 on the Civil Code], Magyar Közlöny, 26 February 2013.
2016. évi CL. törvény az általános közigazgatási rendtartásról [Act CL of 2016 on the General Administrative Procedure], Magyar Közlöny, 14 December 2016.
2019. évi LXIV. törvény egyes törvényeknek az épített és a természeti környezet védelmével, valamint a kulturális örökségvédelemmel összefüggő módosításáról [Act LXIV of 2019 Amending Certain Acts Related to the Protection of the Built and Natural Environment and the Protection of Cultural Heritage], Magyar Közlöny, 8 July 2019.
22/2019. (II. 25.) Korm. rendelet a közgyűjteményekben őrzött vitatott tulajdonú kulturális javak visszaadásának rendjéről szóló 449/2013. (XI. 28.) Korm. rendelet hatályon kívül helyezéséről és az azzal összefüggő átmeneti rendelkezésekről [Government Decree no. 22/2019 (25.02) repealing Government Decree 449/2013 (28.11) on the Procedure for the Return of Disputed Cultural Property in Public Collections], Magyar Közlöny, 25 February 2019.
449/2013. (XI. 28.) Korm. rendelet a közgyűjteményekben őrzött vitatott tulajdonú kulturális javak visszaadásának rendjéről [Government Decree no. 449/2013 (28.11) on the Procedure for the Return of Disputed Cultural Property in Public Collections], Magyar Közlöny, 28 November 2013.
Adewumi A.A., Adenekan V.O., Making the Case for the Restitution of Illicitly Acquired Cultural Objects under the Rules of Jus Cogens, “Santander Art and Culture Law Review” 2023, Vol. 2(9).
Administrative and Labour Court of Budapest, 10.K.31.473/2016/11.
Bandle A.L., Contel R., Reparation Art: Finding Common Ground in the Resolution of Disputes on Russian War Spoils and Nazi-Looted Art, in: V. Vadi, H.E.G.S. Schneider (eds.), Art, Cultural Heritage and the Market. Ethical and Legal Issues, Springer, Berlin 2014.
Bazyler J. et al. (eds.), Searching for Justice after the Holocaust. Fulfilling the Terezin Declaration and Immovable Property Restitution, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2019.
Beate R., European Court of Human Rights Regulation of Cultural Property: Preemptive Right of State to Acquire Works of Art Compensation for Deprivation of Possessions. UNESCO Convention on Cultural Property: Beyeler v. Italy, “American Journal of International Law” 2000, Vol. 94.
Bidault M., Bouchard J., Carril B.B., The Meaning of Culture from a Human Rights Approach: The Mandate of the UN Special Rapporteur in the Field of Cultural Rights, “Santander Art and Culture Law Review” 2019, Vol. 2(5).
Campfens E. et al., Protecting Cultural Heritage from Armed Conflicts in Ukraine and Beyond, European Union, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, Directorate-General for Internal Policies, PE 733.120, March 2023.
Capote Pérez L.J., Cultural Heritage and Spanish Private Law, “Santander Art and Culture Law Review” 2017, Vol. 2(3).
Constitutional Court (Hungary), Decision no. 10/2023 (VI. 20.).
Constitutional Court (Hungary), Decision no. 11/2013 (V. 9.).
Constitutional Court (Hungary), Decision no. 15/1993. (III. 12.).
Constitutional Court (Hungary), Decision no. 16/1991. (IV. 20.).
Constitutional Court (Hungary), Decision no. 21/1990. (X. 4.).
Constitutional Court (Hungary), Decision no. 23/2022. (X. 19.).
Constitutional Court (Hungary), Decision no. 27/1991. (V. 20.).
Constitutional Court (Hungary), Decision no. 28/1991. (VI. 3.).
Constitutional Court (Hungary), Decision no. 3042/2021. (II. 19.).
Constitutional Court (Hungary), Decision no. 59/1991. (XI. 19.).
Court of Appeal of Budapest, 4.P.22.219/2020/5.
De Csepel v. Republic of Hungary, 714 F.3d 591, 593 (D.C. Cir. 2013).
ECtHR Research Division, Guide on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights – Protection of Property, 2022.
Edwards M.A., The Paradoxes of Restitution, “West Virginia University Law Review” 2013, Vol. 116.
European Court of Human Rights, Béláné Nagy v. Hungary, Application no. 53080/13, Judgment of 13 December 2016.
European Court of Human Rights, Beyeler v. Italy, Application no. 33202/96, Judgment of 5 January 2000.
European Court of Human Rights, Broniowski v. Poland, Application no. 31443/96, Judgment of 22 June 2004.
European Court of Human Rights, Kopecký v. Slovakia, Application no. 44912/98, Judgment of 28 September 2004.
European Court of Human Rights, Parvanov and Others v. Bulgaria, Application no. 74787/01, Judgment of 7 January 2010.
European Court of Human Rights, Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany, Application no. 42527/98, Judgment of 12 July 2001.
European Court of Human Rights, Tudor Tudor v. Romania, Application no. 21911/03, Judgment of 24 March 2009.
Forder C., The Bredius Museum Case: Public Interest and Private International Law, “International Journal of Cultural Property” 1993, Vol. 2.
Gaudenzi B., Niemeyer L., Between Material Culture and “Living Room Art”: Historicizing the Restitution of Fascist-Looted Art, “International Journal of Cultural Property” 2021, Vol. 28.
Gerstenblith P., Acquisition and Deacquisition of Museum Collections and the Fiduciary Obligations of Museums to the Public, “Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review” 2003, Vol. 11.
Gerstenblith P., Protecting Cultural Heritage in Armed Conflict: Looking Back, Looking Forward, “Cardozo Public Law, Policy, and Ethics Journal” 2009, Vol. 7.
Gwoździewicz-Matan P., Jakubowski A., Enhancing the Mobility of Collections and Access to Cultural Heritage: Immunity of Cultural Objects from Seizure in Poland, “International Journal of Cultural Policy” 2019, Vol. 25.
Jakab A., European Constitutional Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2016.
Jakubowski A., Cultural Heritage and the Collective Dimension of Cultural Rights in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, in: A.J. Wiesand et al. (eds.), Culture and Human Rights: The Wroclaw Commentaries, De Gruyter, Berlin–Boston 2016.
Jakubowski A., Territoriality and State Succession in Cultural Heritage, “International Journal of Cultural Property” 2014, Vol. 21.
Kowalski W.W., The Machinery of Nazi Art Looting: The Nazi Law on the Confiscation of Cultural Property – Poland: A Case Study, “Art, Antiquity and Law” 2000, Vol. 5.
Kuklik J., Restitution of Jewish Property in the Czech Republic, “Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review” 2019, Vol. 41.
Kuti C., Post-Communist Property Reparations: Fulfilling the Promises of the Rule of Law? “Acta Juridica Hungarica” 2007, Vol. 2.
Magyarország Alaptörvénye [Fundamental Law of Hungary], Magyar Közlöny, 25 April 2011.
Manikowska E., The Washington Principles à rebours: Explaining Poland’s Current Restitution Policy, “International Journal of Cultural Property” 2023, Vol. 30.
Merryman J., Cultural Property Ethics, “International Journal of Cultural Property” 1998, Vol. 7.
Michl F., The Protection of Cultural Goods and the Right to Property under the ECHR, in: E. Lagrange, S. Oeter, R. Uerpmann-Wittzack (eds.), Cultural Heritage and International Law. Objects, Means and Ends of International Protection, Springer, Cham 2018.
Minister of the Prime Minister’s Office, Decision no. MHF/469/2 (2020).
Minister of the Prime Minister’s Office, Information letter KTHÁT/428/2/2017, 4 July 2017.
Niec H., Legislative Models of Protection of Cultural Property, “Hastings Law Journal” 1976, Vol. 27.
Pavoni R., Cultural Heritage and State Immunity, in: A.F. Vrdoljak (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Cultural Heritage Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2020.
Pomeisl A.J., A Legfelsőbb Bíróság/Kúria államosítással kapcsolatos gyakorlata, különös tekintettel az 1945 és 1957 közötti időszakra [The Supreme Court’s Practice Regarding Nationalization, with Special Attention to the Period Between 1945 and 1957], “Kúriai Döntések” 2023.
Rikon M., Property Rights as Defined and Protected by International Courts, “Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference Journal” 2017.
Selter E., Returning the Gods to the People: Heritage Restitution in Nepal, “Santander Art and Culture Law Review” 2022, Vol. 2(8).
Sperka K., A Golgotát járt Golgota [The Golgota that Went Through Golgotha], in: K. Erdei (ed.), Tanulmánykötet a Kúria Közigazgatási Szakágában 2019-ben ítélkező bírák tollából [Study Volume from the Judges of the Supreme Court’s Administrative Division Adjudicating in 2019], Curia, Budapest 2019.
Stola D., The Polish Debate on the Holocaust and the Restitution of Property, in: M. Dean, C. Goschler, P. Ther (eds.), Robbery and Restitution. The Conflict over Jewish Property in Europe, Berghahn Books, New York 2007.
Supreme Court (Hungary), Decision no. Kfv.II.37.112/2020/8.
Supreme Court (Hungary), Decision no. Kfv.VI.38.158/2016.
Supreme Court (Hungary), Decision no. Pfv.II.20.909/2021/9.
Supreme Court (Hungary), Motion no. III/01335/2020.
Szabados T., Right to Property and Cultural Heritage Protection in the Light of the Practice of the European Court of Human Rights, “Central European Journal of Comparative Law” 2022, Vol. 3.
Trykhlib K., The Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, in: D. Duić, T. Petrašević (eds.), EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series (ECLIC), Issue 4. EU 2020: Lessons from the Past and Solutions for the Future, University Josip Juraj Strossmayer of Osijek, Osijek 2020.
Zweig R.W., The Hungarian Gold Train. Fantasies of Wealth and the Madness of Genocide, in: M. Dean, C. Goschler, P. Ther (eds.), Robbery and Restitution. The Conflict over Jewish Property in Europe, Berghahn Books, New York 2007.
Information: Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2024, 2/2024 (10), pp. 181 - 208
Article type: Original article
Titles:
HUN-REN Research Centre for the Humanities (HUN-REN RCH)
Hungary
Széchenyi István University
Hungary
Published at: 18.12.2024
Article status: Open
Licence: CC BY
Percentage share of authors:
Information about author:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
EnglishView count: 120
Number of downloads: 38