Institution of an expert in criminal and civil proceedings – similarities and differences
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEInstytucja biegłego w postępowaniu karnym i postępowaniu cywilnym – podobieństwa i różnice
Publication date: 03.2021
Attorney-at-Law, 2021, 1 (26), pp. 99 - 119
https://doi.org/10.4467/23921943RP.21.004.13892Authors
Instytucja biegłego w postępowaniu karnym i postępowaniu cywilnym – podobieństwa i różnice
Institution of an expert in criminal and civil proceedings – similarities and differences
An expert in both criminal and civil proceedings is a qualified assistant of the court (or other procedural bodies) providing special evidentiary information. The opinion issued by him is an independent source of evidence of specific importance. Contrary to a witness, they are not providers of information about facts, but interpreters of these facts from a scientific and technical point of view. They must possess specialized knowledge and experience otherwise unavailable to other participants in the proceedings. The role and function of experts in criminal and civil proceedings are seemingly similar. However, each of these proceedings has many special regulations that cause significant differences in this respect. These differences are the focus of this study.
Information: Attorney-at-Law, 2021, 1 (26), pp. 99 - 119
Article type: Original article
Titles:
Instytucja biegłego w postępowaniu karnym i postępowaniu cywilnym – podobieństwa i różnice
Institution of an expert in criminal and civil proceedings – similarities and differences
Published at: 03.2021
Article status: Open
Licence: None
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
PolishView count: 302
Number of downloads: 699