Żaneta Gwardzińska-Chowaniec
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 71 - 88
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.019.10373Since 2009 the Eastern Partnership has become an important element of the European Union (EU) external policy. It constitutes an institutionalized forum of cooperation and dialogue between the EU, its Member States, and six states which emerged in the process of dissolution of the Soviet Union: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine. It brings a new dimension to the European Neighbourhood Policy, complementing its Northern Dimension and the Union for the Mediterranean. Arguably, its establishment also marks a new dimension of the EU’s international cultural cooperation. Now is a good time to reflect upon and evaluate the decade-long period of operation of the Eastern Partnership initiative. This article addresses the following questions with respect to the Eastern Partnership: What is the nature of the cultural cooperation?; How does it address the cultural heritage objectives of the EU?; and Has the Partnership contributed to the development of the EU’s Eastern Neighbourhood?
Żaneta Gwardzińska-Chowaniec
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2019 (5), 2019, pp. 180 - 181
Informacja o książce Eweliny Kowalskiej Własność zabytku a dyskrecjonalna władza konserwatorska
ISBN 978-83-7865-711-8
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Gdańsk 2018
Żaneta Gwardzińska-Chowaniec
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 260 - 262
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.015.9792About a book: Restytucja i ochrona dóbr kultury. Zagadnienia prawne
red. Iwona Gredka-Ligarska, Anna Rogacka-Łukasik
ISBN 978-83-65682-76-5
Oficyna Wydawnicza „Humanitas”, Sosnowiec 2017
Żaneta Gwardzińska-Chowaniec
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2015 (1), 2015, pp. 278 - 280
Żaneta Gwardzińska-Chowaniec
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2019 (5), 2019, pp. 97 - 116
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.19.005.10806This article focuses on legal aspects related to the termination of museum-related activities by their organizers or founders. The aim is to consider the diversity of museums and their activities on the basis of generally applicable regulations, in particular the Act of 21 November 1996 on museums (Journal of Laws of 2018, item 720 and 1669) and the Act of 28 February 2003 on bankruptcy (Journal of Laws of 2017, item 2344, as amended). The termination of the legal entity’s activity is often related to the lack of funds for further operations (i.e., bankruptcy). Therefore, the article analyzes applicable legal provisions regarding the liquidation and bankruptcy of museums in the creative sector enterprises. The entirety of the analysis is influenced by the conclusions de lege ferenda and de lege lata, which were formulated on the basis of the author’s own observations.
Żaneta Gwardzińska-Chowaniec
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 247 - 250
Żaneta Gwardzińska-Chowaniec
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 259 - 262
Żaneta Gwardzińska-Chowaniec
Culture Management, Volume 17, Issue 3, 2016, pp. 231 - 242
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843976ZK.16.015.5069
The paper focuses on the protection of the material cultural heritage of national minorities and ethnic minorities in the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. Heritage protection is a responsibility imposed on public authorities. It should be noted that it is an obligation of general application and refers to the whole inheritance. The Constitution regulates the issues of protection of national minorities and ethnic minorities in very general terms, so general rules are applied.
Żaneta Gwardzińska-Chowaniec
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 237 - 239
Żaneta Gwardzińska-Chowaniec
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 251 - 252
Żaneta Gwardzińska-Chowaniec
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2021 (7), 2021, pp. 233 - 235
Żaneta Gwardzińska-Chowaniec
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2019 (5), 2019, pp. 171 - 174
Żaneta Gwardzińska-Chowaniec
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 167 - 186
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSR.16.011.5245The article offers an analysis of the revocation procedure for temporary monuments export licenses and the participation of social organizations in such proceedings. The procedure concerns the groundless of temporary permission. The authorization is withdrawn on the basis of Article 56 of the Act on the Protection of Monuments and the Guardianship of Monuments in the form of administrative decision. This legal structure constitutes an extraordinary mode of procedure, within the understanding of the Administrative Procedure Code. The analysis of this problematic article also includes the impact of any social organization on the decision-making procedure of provincial conservators.
Żaneta Gwardzińska-Chowaniec
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2017 (3), 2017, pp. 239 - 248
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.17.015.7387This article focuses on criminal law aspects of registering the personal data files with the General Inspector of Personal Data Protection. It should be emphasized that museums have only partially implemented the provisions of the Act on the Personal Data Protection Act of 29 August 1997 (Journal of Laws of 2016.922). However, some have successfully established Information Security Administrators (ISAs) and register collections of personal data with them. An important aspect of this paper is its analysis of the public register of personal data files. The author presents the results of a survey conducted among museums with ISAs, which have unregistered personal data files.
Żaneta Gwardzińska-Chowaniec
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2019 (5), 2019, pp. 267 - 270
Żaneta Gwardzińska-Chowaniec
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 253 - 254