On the types of assessments concerning the effectiveness of medical procedures
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEOn the types of assessments concerning the effectiveness of medical procedures
Data publikacji: 28.03.2018
Zdrowie Publiczne i Zarządzanie, 2017, Tom 15, Numer 4, s. 317 - 324
https://doi.org/10.4467/20842627OZ.17.034.8288Autorzy
On the types of assessments concerning the effectiveness of medical procedures
1. Miller F.G., Brody H., Chung K.C., Cosmetic surgery and the internal morality of medicine, “Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics” 2000; 9: 353–364.
2. Tragakes E., Vienonen M., Key Issues in Rationing and Priority Setting for Health Care Services, WHO/EURO Health Services Management, New York 1998.
3. Gilbert R.E., Augood C., Gupta R., Ades A.E., Logan S., Sculpher M., van Der Meulen J.H., Screening for Down’s syndrome: effects, safety, and cost effectiveness of first and second trimester strategies, “British Medical Journal” 2001; 323: 1–6.
4. Park R.E., Fink A., Brook R.H., Physician ratings of appropriate indicators for six medical and surgical procedures, “Am. J. Public Health” 1986; 76: 766–772.
5. Mandelblatt J.S., Fryback D.G., Weinstein M.C., Assessing the effectiveness of health interventions for cost-effectiveness analysis, “Journal of General Internal Medicine” 1997; 12 (9): 551–558. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07107.x.
6. Haynes B., Can it work? Does it work? Is it worth it? The testing of healthcare interventions is evolving, “British Medical Journal” 1999; 319: 652–653.
7. Marley J., Efficacy, effectiveness, efficiency, “Australian Prescriber” 2000; 23: 114–151.
8. Luce B.R., Drummond M., Jönsson B., Neumann P.J., Schwartz J.S., Siebert U., S.D., EBM, HTA, and CER: Clearing the Confusion, “Milbank Q” 2010; 88 (2): 256–276. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00598.x
9. Rynek Zdrowia, 19 listopada 2015 r., Eksperci: leki w iniekcjach to mniejsze koszty leczenia schizofrenii; http://www.rynekzdrowia.pl/Uslugi-medyczne/Eksperci-leki-w-iniekcje-to-mniejsze-kleszty-leczenia-schizofrenii,156900,8.html (accessed: 01.10.2017).
10. NICE (The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence), Guide to the methods of technology appraisal 2013; https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg9/chapter/foreword, (accessed: 01.10.2017).
11. AOTMiT (Agencja Oceny Technologii Medycznych i Taryfikacji), Wytyczne oceny technologii medycznych (HTA), AOTMiT, Warszawa 2016.
12. Muldoon M.F., Manuck S.B., Matthews K.A., Lowering cholesterol concentrations and mortality: A quantitative review of primary prevention trials, “British Medical Journal” 1990; 301 (6747): 309–314.
13. Fleming T.R., DeMets D.L., Surrogate end points in clinical trials: Are we being misled? “Ann. Mem. Med.” 1996; 125: 605–613.
14. Ross W.D., Foundations of Ethics. The Gifford Lectures, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2000.
15. Howard K.I., Mora K., Brill P.L., Martinovich, Z., Lutz W., Evaluation of psychotherapy: Efficacy, effectiveness, and patient progress, “American Psychologist” 1996; 51: 1059–1064.
16. Sassi F., Le Grand J., Archard L., Equity versus efficiency: a dilemma for the NHS : If the NHS is serious about equity it must offer guidance when principles conflict, “British Medical Journal” 2001; 323 (7316): 762–763.
Informacje: Zdrowie Publiczne i Zarządzanie, 2017, Tom 15, Numer 4, s. 317 - 324
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
On the types of assessments concerning the effectiveness of medical procedures
On the types of assessments concerning the effectiveness of medical procedures
Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Wydział Filozoficzny, Instytut Filozofii, Zakład Badań nad Etyką Zawodową
Publikacja: 28.03.2018
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
AngielskiLiczba wyświetleń: 1347
Liczba pobrań: 949