Nowe siedziby instytucji kultury w Polsce – perspektywa lokalnych ekosystemów kultury
Wybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTENowe siedziby instytucji kultury w Polsce – perspektywa lokalnych ekosystemów kultury
Data publikacji: 09.2021
Zarządzanie w Kulturze, 2021, Tom 22, Numer 3, s. 323-341
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843976ZK.21.021.14281Autorzy
Nowe siedziby instytucji kultury w Polsce – perspektywa lokalnych ekosystemów kultury
Building new venues for cultural activity involves a shift in the balance of power in the entire system of relations in the local communities of authors and organisers. This is a matter of budget and, very often, also of cultural policy priorities. Furthermore, it entails a significant change in the long-term funding of cultural initiatives and cultural entities in each region. The phenomenon of the emergence of many new cultural facilities has inspired a few fundamental questions about their attitudes to selected values in the field of sustainable development goals, particularly in the social and economic dimensions, but ultimately also of the impact of new cultural venues on the natural environment. Are the new investments in culture opportunities, challenges, or perhaps threats resulting from the rescaled or disturbed balance in local cultural ecosystems? The theoretical perspective, which organises the debate on these areas, takes the cultural ecosystem as a key concept, using it as a basis for the description of phenomena in local urban communities. The observations presented are based on the qualitative and quantitative research conducted in eight cultural institutions in eight Polish cities. The results reveal the importance of between ten and twenty fundamental dimensions of the activity of cultural institutions and their local government organisers which allow them to put down their roots more deeply in the city’s cultural ecosystem. A new building opens completely new possibilities, but it is extremely important to tailor the institution to the real, sagaciously assessed, and well-balanced possibilities of the local ecosystem.
Afeltowicz Ł., Gadecki J., Olechnicki K., Szlendak T., Wróblewski M. (2018), Efekt Bilbao/kult Cargo. Nowe instytucje kultury w Polsce, Elbląg: Wilk Stepowy.
Bianchini F. (1996), Cultural planning: An innovative approach to urban development, [w:] J. Verwijnen, P. Lehtovuori (red.), Managing urban change, Helsinki: University of Art and Design Helsinki, s. 18–25.
De Beukelaer Ch., Duxbury N., Kangas A. (2017), Cultural policies for sustainable development: four strategic paths, „International Journal of Cultural Policy”, t. 23, nr 2, s. 214–230.
Holden, J. (2015), The Ecology of Culture, AHRC, https://ahrc.ukri.org/documents/project-reports-and-reviews/the-ecology-of-culture [odczyt: 15.02.2021].
Isar Y.R. (2016), ‘Culture’, ‘sustainable development’ and cultural policy: a contrarian view, „International Journal of Cultural Policy”, 23, 2, s. 148–158.
Kagan S., Hauerwaas A., Holz V., Wedler P. (2018), Culture in sustainable urban development: Practices and policies for spaces of possibility and institutional innovations, „City, Culture, and Society”, vol. 13, s. 32–45.
Landry Ch., Bianchini F. (1995), The creative city, London: Demos.
Markussen A. et al. (2011), California’s arts and cultural ecology, James Irvine Foundation www.irvine.org/publications-by-topic/arts/arts-ecology-reports [odczyt: 15.02.2021].
Maughan C., Bianchini F. (2004), Economic and social impact of cultural festivals in the East Midlands, Report for Arts Council England, https://static.a-n.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Economic-and-social-impact-final-report.pdf [odczyt: 15.02.2021].
McGuigan J. (1996), Rethinking cultural policy, Maidenhead: Oxford University Press.
McGuigan J. (2010), Cultural analysis, London: Sage.
Poprawski M. (2016), Intergenerational transmission of values and cultural sustainability: The cultural participation of local, small town communities in Poland, „Law, Social Justice and Global Development Journal”, 1, https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/lgd/2016-1/ [odczyt: 15.02.2021].
Poprawski M. (2019), New organisms in the cultural ‘ecosystems’ of cities: The rooting and sustainability of arts and culture organizations, [w:] W.J. Byrnes, A. Brkić (red.), The Routledge companion to arts management, London: Routledge, s. 278–295.
ROK UAM/ZMP – Regionalne Obserwatorium Kultury UAM i Związek Miast Polskich (2017), Nowe lokowanie instytucji publicznych w miejskich ekosystemach kultury, https://www.miasta.pl/uploads/attachment/file/1209/Nowe_lokowanie_instytucji_publicznych_w_miejskich_ekosystemach_kultury_w_Polsce__2016__-_RAPORT__PDF_.pdf [odczyt: 15.02.2021].
Silver D.A., Nichols Clark T. (2016), Scenescapes: How qualities of place shape social life, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Soini K., Dessein J. (2016), Culture-sustainability relation: Towards a conceptual framework, „Sustainability”, 8, s. 167; doi:10.3390/su8020167.
Throsby D. (2017), Culturally sustainable development: theoretical concept or practical policy instrument, „International Journal of Cultural Policy”, 32, 2, s. 133–147.
Vandenbroeck Ph. (2017), Culture and the social learning process towards sustainability, [w:] S. Asikainen, C. Brites, K. Plebańczyk, L. Rogač Mijatović, K. Soini (red.), Culture in sustainability. Towards a transdisciplinary approach, Jyväskylä, s. 22–28.
Informacje: Zarządzanie w Kulturze, 2021, Tom 22, Numer 3, s. 323-341
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Nowe siedziby instytucji kultury w Polsce – perspektywa lokalnych ekosystemów kultury
Publikacja: 09.2021
Otrzymano: 30.03.2021
Zaakceptowano: 01.09.2021
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
PolskiLiczba wyświetleń: 1475
Liczba pobrań: 1485