Wh-pronoun and complementizer relative clauses: unintegration features in conversational Polish
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWh-pronoun and complementizer relative clauses: unintegration features in conversational Polish
Data publikacji: 30.05.2017
Studies in Polish Linguistics, Volume 12 (2017), Vol. 12, Issue 1, s. 1 - 26
https://doi.org/10.4467/23005920SPL.17.001.6728Autorzy
Wh-pronoun and complementizer relative clauses: unintegration features in conversational Polish
The paper examines syntactic features of non-canonical relativization in spoken Polish that loosen the structural integration of two types of relative clauses – one introduced by the complementizer co, the other by the wh-pronoun który. The resulting unintegration holds between the head NP and the co/który clause and contrasts with the integrated structure of canonical relatives. I discuss the range of unintegration features observed for both types in corpus data and indicate the distinct quantitative extents to which the two types are unintegrated. Although the nature of spontaneous conversation is such that it imposes some loosening of structural cohesion in both types, co clauses (especially non-subject relative clauses) are far more frequently unintegrated than który clauses. Also, co clauses depart functionally from the canonical relative structure in that the complementizer co serves functions other than that of a straightforward relativizer, namely it has conjunction-like uses (temporal, spatial, and general conjunction), indicating an expansion of the categorial status of co. The observed unintegration of Polish conversational relatives is in line with previous analyses of the syntax of unplanned speech (e.g. Miller and Weinert 1998)
Biber Douglas, Johansson Stig, Leech Geoff rey, Conrad Susan, Finegan Edward (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Bondaruk Anna (1995). Resumptive pronouns in English and Polish. In Licensing in Syntax and Phonology. PASE Studies and Monographs, vol. 1, Edmund Gussmann (ed.), 27–55. Lublin: Folium.
BoškovićŽeljko (2009). On Relativization Strategies and Resumptive Pronouns. In Studies in Formal Slavic Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Semantics and Information Structure. Proceedings of FDSL 7, Gerhild Zybatow, Uwe Junghanns, Denisa Lenertova, Petr Biskup (eds.), 79–92. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Boye Kasper, Kehayov Petar (eds.) (2016). Complementizer Semantics in European Languages [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 57]. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
Broihier Kevin (1995). Optimality-theoretic rankings with tied constraints. Slavic relatives, resumptive pronouns and learnability. MIT. PhD dissertation.
Callies Marcus (2012). Th e grammaticalization and pragmaticalization of cleft constructions in present-day English. In Corpus Linguistics: Looking Back – Moving Forward, Sebastian Hoffmann, Paul Rayson, Geoff rey Leech (eds.), 5–21. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Chafe Wallace (1982). Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy, Deborah Tannen (ed.), 35–53. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Citko Barbara (2004). On headed, headless and light-headed relatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Th eory 22(1), 95–126.
Deulofeu Jose (1981). Perspective linguistique et sociolinguistique dans l’etude des relatives en francais. Recherches sur le Français Parlé 3, 135–194.
Enkvist Nils Erik (1982). Imprompu speech, structure and process. In Impromptu Speech: A Symposium, Nils Erik Enkvist (ed.), 11–32, Abo: Abo Akademi Foundation.
Fiorentino Giuliana (2007). European relative clauses and the uniqueness of the relative pronoun type. Rivista di Linguistica 19(2), 263–291.
Fried Mirjam (2010). Accusative resumptive pronoun in Czech relative clauses with absolutive relativizer co. Korpus, Gramatika, Axiologie 1(1), 16–29.
Fried Mirjam (2011). Grammatical analysis and corpus evidence. In Grammar and Corpora 3, Marek Konopka, Jacqueline Kubczak, Christian Mair, František Šticha, Ulrich H. Wassner (eds.), 63–86. Mannheim: Narr Verlag.
Greenbaum Sidney, Nelson Gerald (1995). Clause relationships in spoken and written English. Functions of Language 2, 1–21.
Guz Wojciech (2015). Th e structural non-integration of wh-cleft s. English Language and Linguistics 19(3), 477–503.
Hansen Bjorn, Letuchiya Alexander, Błaszczyk Izabela (2016). Complementizers in Slavonic (Russian, Polish, and Bulgarian). In Boye, Kehayov (eds.), 175–223.
Hladnik Marko (2015). Mind the gap. Resumption in Slavic relative clauses. Utrecht University. PhD dissertation.
Hopper J. Paul, Thompson Sandra A. (2008). Projectibility and clause combining in interaction. In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining. Th e Multifunctionality of Conjunctions, Ritva Laury (ed.), 99–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ilc Gašper (2011). Optionality of the genitive (of negation) in Slovene. In Formalization of Grammar in Slavic Languages. Contributions of the Eighth International Conference on Formal Description of Slavic Languages – FDSL VIII 2009 University of Potsdam, December 2-5, 2009, Peter Kosta and Lilia Schurcks (eds.), 193–206. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Kehayov Petar, Boye Kasper (2016). Complementizer semantics in European languages: overview and generalizations. In Boye, Kehayov (eds.), 809–878.
Lavine James E. (2003). Resumption in Slavic. Phases, cyclicity and case. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 11, Wayles Browne (ed.), 355–372. Ann Arbour Michigan Slavic Publications.
Lapteva Olga A. (1976). Russkij razgovornyj sintaksis. Moscow: Nauka.
Łęska Paulina (2016). Agreement under case matching in Polish co and który relative clauses headed by numerically quantifi ed nouns. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 24(1), 113–136.
Miller Jim (2006). Spoken and written English. In Th e Handbook of English Linguistics, Bas Aarts and April McMahon (eds.), 670–691. Oxford: Blackwell.
Miller Jim (2011). A Critical Introduction to Syntax. London/New York: Continuum.
Miller Jim, Fernandez-Vest Jocelyne, J. (2006). Spoken and written language. In Pragmatic Organisation of Discourse in the Languages in Europe, Giuliano Bernini and Maria L. Schwartz (eds.), 9–64. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Miller Jim, Weinert Regina (1998). Spontaneous Spoken Language. Syntax and Discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Minlos Philip (2012). Slavic relative čto/co: between pronouns and conjunctions. Slověne. International Journal of Slavic Studies 1(1), 74–91.
Murelli Adriano (2011). Relative Constructions in European Non-Standard Varieties [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 50]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Mykowiecka Agnieszka (2001). Polish relatives with the marker co. In Generative Linguistics in Poland. Proceedings of the GLiP-2 Conference, Adam Przepiorkowski and Piotr Bański (eds.), 149–57. Warszawa: Instytut Podstaw Informatyki PAN.
Pęzik Piotr (2015). Spokes – a search and exploration servi ce for conversational corpus data. In Selected Papers from the CLARIN 2014 Conference, Jan Odijk (ed.), 99–109. Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press. [Spokes available on-line, URL: http://spokes.clarin-pl.eu; accessed December 15, 2016]
Przepiorkowski Adam (2000). Long distance genitive of negation in Polish. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 8, 119–158.
Quaglio Paulo, Biber Douglas (2006). Th e grammar of conversation. In Th e Handbook of English Linguistics, Bas Aarts and April McMahon (eds.), 692–723. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sornicola Rosanna (1981). Sul Parlato. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Szczegielniak Adam (2006). Two types of resumptive pronouns in Polish relative clauses. In Linguistic Variation Yearbook 5, Pierre Pica, Johan Rooryck, Jeroen van Craenenbroeck (eds.), 165–185. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Willis David (2013). Negation in the history of Slavonic languages. In Th e History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, vol. 1. Case Studies, David Willis, Christopher Lucas, Anne Breitbarth (eds.), 342–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zemskaja Elena A. (1973). Russkaja razgovornaja reč. Moscow: Nauka.
Informacje: Studies in Polish Linguistics, Volume 12 (2017), Vol. 12, Issue 1, s. 1 - 26
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Wh-pronoun and complementizer relative clauses: unintegration features in conversational Polish
The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
Publikacja: 30.05.2017
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
AngielskiLiczba wyświetleń: 2081
Liczba pobrań: 1335