Bateman J.A. 2014. Text and image. A critical introduction to the visual/verbal divide. Lon­don, New York.

Calbris G. 2008. From left to right…: Coverbal gestures and their symbolic use of space. – Cienki A., Müller C. (eds.). Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: 27–54.

Cienki A. 1997. Some properties and groupings of image schemas. – Verspoor M., Lee K.D., Sweetser E. (eds.). Lexical and syntactic constructions and the construction of meaning. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: 3–15.

Cienki A. 1998. Straight: an image schema and its metaphorical extensions. – Cognitive Linguistics 9: 107–149.

Cienki A. 2005. Image schemas and gesture. – Hampe (2005b): 412–444.

Cienki A. 2013. Image schemas and mimetic schemas in cognitive linguistics and gesture studies. – Review of Cognitive Linguistics 11.2: 417–432.

Evans V., Green M. 2006. Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh.

Fauconnier G., Turner M. 1998. Conceptual integration networks. – Cognitive Science 22: 133–187.

Fauconnier G., Turner M. 2002. The way we think. Conceptual blending and the mind’s hid­den complexities. New York.

Forceville Ch. 2005. Visual representations of the idealized cognitive model of anger in the Asterix album La Zizanie. – Journal of Pragomatics 37.1: 69–88.

Forceville Ch. 2006. The source-path-goal schema in the autobiographical journey docu­mentary: McElwee, Van der Keuken, Cole. – The New Review of Film and Television Studies 4.3: 241–261.

Forceville Ch. 2013. Metaphor and symbol. Searching for one’s identity is looking for a home in animation film. – Review of Cognitive Linguistics 11.2: 250–268.

Forceville Ch., Urios-Aparisi E. 2009a. Introduction. – Forceville Ch., Urios-Aparisi E. (2009b): 3–17.

Forceville Ch., Urios-Aparisi E. (eds.). 2009b. Multimodal metaphor. Berlin, New York.

Forceville Ch., Veale T., Feyaerts K. 2010. Balloonics: The visuals of balloons in comics. – Goggin J., Hassler-Forest D. (eds.). The rise and reason of comics and graphic literature: Critical essays on the form. Jefferson (NC), London (UK): 56–73.

Gibbs R.W. 2015a. Does deliberate metaphor theory have a future? – Journal of Pragmat­ics 90: 73–76.

Gibbs R.W. 2015b. Do pragmatic signals affect conventional metaphor understanding? A failed test of deliberate metaphor theory. – Journal of Pragmatics 90: 77–87.

Górska E. 2014a. The up/down orientation in language and music. – Brenzinger M., Kraska--Szlenk I. (eds.). The body in language. Comparative studies of linguistic embodiment. [= Brill’s Studies in Language, Cognition and Culture vol. 8]. Leiden: 177–195.

Górska E. 2014b. Dynamiczne podejście do metafory. – Prace Filologiczne 64.2: 109–122.

Hampe B. 2005a. When down is not bad and up is not good enough: A usage-based assessment of the plus-minus parameter in image-schema theory. – Cognitive Linguistics 16.1: 81–112.

Hampe B. (ed.). 2005b. From perception to meaning. Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin.

Hurtienne J. 2014. Non-linguistic applications of cognitive linguistics: On the usefulness of image-schematic metaphors in user interface design. – Littlemore J., Taylor J.R. (eds.). The Bloomsbury companion to cognitive linguistics. London: 301–324.

Johnson M. 1987. The body in the mind: The bodily basis of imagination, reason, and mean­ing. Chicago.

Johnson M. 2007. The meaning of the body. Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago.

Kennedy J.M. 1982. Metaphor in pictures. – Perception 11.5: 589–605.

Kövecses Z. 2008. Conceptual metaphor theory. Some criticisms and alternative propos­als. – Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 6: 168–184.

Lakoff G. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago.

Lakoff G. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. – Ortony A. (ed.). Metaphor and thought. [2nd edition]. Cambridge (UK): 202–251.

Lakoff G., Johnson M. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York.

Lakoff G., Turner M. 1989. More than cool reason. A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago.

Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk B. (ed.). 2016. Conceptualizations of time. Amsterdam, Philadelphia.

Macaranas A., Antle A.N., Riecke B.E. 2012. Bridging the gap: Attribute and spatial meta­phors for tangible interface design. – Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction. Kingston (Ontario, Canada): 161–168.

Mandler J.M. 2010. The spatial foundations of the conceptual system. – Language and Cog­nition 2.1: 21–44.

Mittelberg I. 2010. Geometric and image-schematic patterns in gesture space. – Evans V., Chilton P. (eds.). Language, cognition, and space: The state of the art and new directions. London: 351–385.

Müller C. 2008. Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking. A dynamic view. Chicago.

Pérez Hernández L. 2013. Approaching the utopia of a global brand. The relevance of im­age schemas as multimodal resources for the branding industry. – Review of Cognitive Linguistics 11.2: 285–302.

Pérez Hernández L. 2014. Cognitive grounding for cross-cultural commercial communica­tion. – Cognitive Linguistics 25.2: 203–248.

Pinar Sanz M.J. (ed.). 2013. Multimodality and cognitive linguistics. [Special issue of Review of Cognitive Linguistics 11.2]. Amsterdam.

Stöckl H. 1997. Textstill und Semiotik englischsprachiger Anzeigenwerbung. Frankfurt am Mein.

Talmy L. 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. – Cognitive Science 12: 49–100.

Zbikowski L.M. 2000. Des Herzraums Abschied: Mark Johnson’s theory of embodied knowl­edge and music theory. – Theory and Practice 22.23: 1–16.

Data source

Kapusta J. 2014. Plus-Minus. Podręcznik do myślenia. Poznań.