Korzystanie z informacji o przekonaniach w tworzeniu argumentu perswazyjnego. Rola rozumienia fałszywych przekonań I i II rzędu
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEKorzystanie z informacji o przekonaniach w tworzeniu argumentu perswazyjnego. Rola rozumienia fałszywych przekonań I i II rzędu
Data publikacji: 08.01.2013
Psychologia Rozwojowa, 2012, Tom 17, Numer 4, s. 45 - 62
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843879PR.12.025.0790Autorzy
Korzystanie z informacji o przekonaniach w tworzeniu argumentu perswazyjnego. Rola rozumienia fałszywych przekonań I i II rzędu
Use of information on belief in creating a persuasive argument. The role of understanding first and second order false beliefs
Whether and when children can apply their developing understanding of belief to persuasion was examined using picture stories tasks. Children created or selected arguments to persuade a parent. In 2 studies, 253 children (aged 4–8 years) engaged in persuasion tasks and in first and second order false-belief reasoning tasks. The belief-relevant argument increased with age. The understanding of false beliefs proved to be a predictor of the ability to refer to the cognitive perspective of others in creating and selecting a persuasive argument. The results suggest that improvements in belief reasoning in early and middle childhood may be refl ected in social interactions such as persuasion.
Apperly I. (2011), Mindreaders. The cognitive basis of theory of mind. Hove and New York: Psychology Press. Taylor & Francis Group.
Astington J.W., Pelletier J., Homer B.D. (2002), Theory of mind and epistemological development: The relation between children’s second-order false-belief understanding and their ability to reason about evidence. New Ideas in Psychology, 20, 131–144.
Bartsch K., London K. (2000), Children’s use of mental state information in selecting persuasive arguments. Developmental Psychology, 36, 352–365.
Bartsch K., London K., Campbell M.D. (2007), Children’s attention to beliefs in interactive persuasion tasks. Developmental Psychology, 43, 111–120.
Bartsch K., Wade Ch.E., Estes D. (2011), Children’s attention to others’ beliefs during persuasion: Improvised and selected arguments to puppets and people. Social Development, 20, 2, 316–333.
Białecka-Pikul M. (2002), Co dzieci wiedzą o umyśle i myśleniu. Kraków: Wydawnictwo UJ.
Białecka-Pikul M. (2010), Teaching children metaphors understanding as a path leading to theory of mind development, European Journal of Developmental Psychology,7, 5, 529–544.
Carpendale J.I., Chandler M.J. (1996), On the distinction between false relief understanding and subscribing to an interpretative theory of mind. Child Development, 67, 1686–1706.
Chandler M.J., Sokol B. (1999), Representation once removed: Children’s developing conceptions of representational life [w:] I.E. Sigel (red.), Development of mental representation: Theories and applications, 201–230. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Clark R.A., Delia J.G. (1976), The development of functional persuasive skills in childhood and early adolescence. Child Development, 47, 1008–1014.
Coull G.J., Leekam S.R., Bennett M. (2006), Simplifying second-order belief attribution: What facilitates children’s performance on measures of conceptual understanding? Social Development, 15, 3, 548–563.
Delia J.G., Kline S.L., Burleson B.R. (1979), The development of persuasive communication strategies in kindergartners through twelfth graders. Communication Monographs, 46, 241–256.
Dunn J. (1991), Understanding others: Evidence from naturalistic studies of children [w:] A. Whiten (red.), Natural theories of mind, 51–62. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
Gajlewicz M. (2009), Techniki perswazyjne. Podstawy. Warszawa: Difin.
Kołodziejczyk A. (2003), Dziecięca koncepcja fi kcji, czyli co jest na niby w telewizji. Kraków: Wydawnictwo UJ.
Kopaliński W. (2007), Słownik wyrazów obcych i zwrotów obcojęzycznych. Warszawa: Ofi cyna Wydawnicza RYTM.
McAlister A.R., Cornwell T.B. (2009), Preschool Children’s Persuasion Knowledge: The Contribution of Theory of Mind. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 28, 2, 175–185.
Miller P.H. (2000), How best to utilize a defi ciency. Child Development, 71, 4, 1013–1017.
Miller P.H., Seier W. (1994), Strategy utilization defi ciencies in children: When, where, and why. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 25, 107–156.
Moses L.J., Baldwin D. (2005), What can the study of cognitive development reveal about children’s ability to appreciate and cope with advertising? Journal of Pubic Policy & Marketing, 24, 2, 186–201.
Pillow B.H. (2002), Children’s and adults’ evaluation of the certainty of deductive inferences, inductive inferences, and guesses. Child Development, 73, 3, 779–792.
Pillow B.H. (2008), Development of Children’s Understanding of Cognitive Activities. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 16, 4, 297–321.
Pillow B.H., Pearson R.M., Hecht M., Bremer A. (2010), Children’s and adults’ judgments of the certainty of deductive inferences, inductive inferences, and guesses. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 171, 3, 203–217.
Selman R.L., Schorin M.Z., Stone C.R., Phelps E. (1983), A naturalistic study of children’s social understanding. Developmental Psychology, 19, 82–102.
Slaughter V., Gopnik A. (1996), Conceptual Coherence in the Child’s Theory of mind: Training Children to Understand Belief. Child Development, 67, 6, 2967–2989.
Tokarski J. (red.) (1980), Słownik wyrazów obcych. Warszawa: PWN.
Wimmer H., Perner J. (1983), Beliefs about Beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in Young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.
Wright P., Friestad M., Boush D., (2005), The Development of Marketplace Persuasion Knowledge in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 24, 2, 222–233.
Yeates K.O., Schultz L.H., Selman R.L. (1991), The development of INA in thought and action: A social-cognitive link to behavioral adjustment and social status. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 37, 369–406.
Yeates K.L., Selman R.L. (1989), Social competence in the schools: Toward an integrative developmental model for intervention. Developmental Review, 9, 64–100.
Informacje: Psychologia Rozwojowa, 2012, Tom 17, Numer 4, s. 45 - 62
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Korzystanie z informacji o przekonaniach w tworzeniu argumentu perswazyjnego. Rola rozumienia fałszywych przekonań I i II rzędu
Use of information on belief in creating a persuasive argument. The role of understanding first and second order false beliefs
Instytut Psychologii, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, ul. Ingardena 6, 30-060 Kraków
Publikacja: 08.01.2013
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: Żadna
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
PolskiLiczba wyświetleń: 2880
Liczba pobrań: 1350