The Sedentarization and Gentrification in Post-Nomadic Districts
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEThe Sedentarization and Gentrification in Post-Nomadic Districts
Data publikacji: 2021
Prace Etnograficzne, 2021, Tom 49 Numer 1-2, s. 37-62
https://doi.org/10.4467/22999558.PE.21.004.14126Autorzy
The Sedentarization and Gentrification in Post-Nomadic Districts
This paper presents a preliminary study on migrant’s adaptation in the post-nomadic settlements inside Mongolia’s Ulaanbaatar and China’s Nantun (Evenk Autonomous Banner or Ewenke Zizhiqi) using specific examples of education and housing. The research fields were selected in order to find urbanised areas with herders migrating to the city, and where such movement is numerous enough to establish districts or at least impact the urban culture. Therefore the context differs from the situations when fewer families enter a relatively large settlement and have to adjust to the found conditions. At first glance the recently urbanised areas might seem a provisional imitation of the city, as a result of the century-long development. The migrants define their culture-based settlement. The shared condition of the selected settlements is the status of a post-nomadic migration destination. Therefore there is an expectation of some shared similarities in city-life adaptation. Presenting such exemplary districts illustrates the interesting social dynamics in the post-nomadic cities. Among the similarities of the formation of the post-nomadic settings, we find some common mechanisms shaping social dynamics in migration, then community foundation. They arise even in the context of exceptionally diverse frameworks of state urban policies. We will also discuss gentrification processes in newly emerged districts and their impact on the cityscape.
Al Jazeera, From the Steppe to the Slum, https://www.youtube.com/watch?fbclid=Iw AR3ayPX4i uLPDvXP2plR1JRSYPY13TtXP3p4Z9v4cctflBbGXhzYDu3cR8U&v=8x7wgiTNfCs& feature=youtu.be (access: 13.01.2021).
Asian Development Bank, 2018 ADB to Help Ulaanbaatar Transform its Ger Areas into Eco-Districts, https://www. adb.org/news/adb-help-ulaanbaatar-transform-its-ger-areas-eco-districts (access: 31.10.2020).
Atwood Ch.P., 2012 Banner, Otog, Thousand: Appanage Communities as the Basic Unit of Traditional Mongolian Society, Mongolian studies, The Mongolian society, Bloomington [Indiana, Etats-Unis].
\Atwood Ch.P., 2020 Bilingual Education in Inner Mongolia: An Explainer, https://madeinchinajournal.com/2020/08/30/bilingual-education-in-inner-mongolia-an-explainer/?fbclid=I wAR3CFOEJQUEAbIQ7Sl8IKTItQH7E88mQ9Kou1Y03URG5Djz7tuBwOvGJ3h4 (access: 31.10.2020).
Bandeira E.M., 2020 Aktuelle Tendenzen der chinesischen Minderheitenpolitik: Zur Reform der zweisprachigen Schulbildung in der Inneren Mongolei, Mongolische Notizen, Heidelberg, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344446594_Aktuelle_Tendenzen_der_chinesischen_Minderheitenpolitik_Zur_Reform_der_zweisprachigen_Schulbildung_ in_der_Inneren_Mongolei (access: 07.11.2020).
Bandeira E.M., “China Perspectives” Special feature: The Urbanisation of Rural China, vol. 95 (3), pp. 53–62.
Bryson J., 2013 The Nature of Gentrification, “Geography Compass”, vol. 7/8, pp. 578–587.
Bumochir D., 2020 The State, Popular Mobilisation and Gold Mining in Mongolia: Shaping ‘Neoliberal’ Policies, London.
Cappelletti A., 2014 Ethnicity Reconsidered: Land Acquisition and Power Dynamics in the Kashgar Prefecture, Dálný východ, Ročník IV, Ołomuniec.
Castro L.J., Rogers A., 1984 What the Age Composition of Migrants Can Tell Us, Laxenburg.
Caulfield J., 1994 City form and Everyday Life: Toronto’s Gentrification and Critical Social Practice, Toronto.
Chan K.W., Buckingham W., 2008 Is China Abolishing the Hukou System?, “The China Quarterly”, vol. 195, pp. 582–606.
Cieślewska A., 2015 Community, the State and Development Assistance: Transforming the Mahalla in Tajikistan, Kraków.
City Population, China: Nèi Mĕnggŭ (Öbür Monggol), http://www.citypopulation.de/en/china/cities/ neimenggu/ (access: 31.10.2020).
Cliff T., 2013 Peripheral Urbanism: Making history on China’s northwest frontier, ”China Perspectives” Special feature: The Urbanisation of Rural China, vol. 95 (3), B. Hillman, J. Unger (eds.), pp. 13–23.
Dumont A., 2017 Declining Evenki ’Identities’: Playing with loyalty in modern and contemporary China. History and Anthropology, “History and Anthropology”, vol. 28 (4), pp. 515–530.
Earth Observatory, 2018 The Urbanization of Ulaanbaatar, https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/im-ages/145125/the-urbanization-of-ulaanbaatar (access: 31.10.2020).
Gardelle L., Zhao Z., 2019 Being a herder in contemporary Mongolia: Nomadic identity and nationhood building at school, “Asian Ethnicity”, vol. 20 (3), pp. 364–385.
Gawlikowski K., 1983 Nation: A Mythological Being in: W. Eberhard, K. Gawlikowski, C.-A. Seyschab (eds.), East Asian Civilizations, New Attempts at Understanding Traditions, 2 Nation and Mythology, Vienna, pp. 10–37.
Gawlikowski K., 2018 Problemy i charakter tożsamości chińskiej in: K. Baraniecka-Olszewska, I. Kabzińska, O. Tangad (eds.), Lokalne i globalne perspektywy azjanistyczne – księga jubileuszowa dla Profesora Sławoja Szynkiewicza, Warszawa, pp. 53–73.
Ger Community Mapping Center, 2012 Ger Community Mapping Center, https://www.germapcenter.org/about.html (access: 31.10.2020).
Ger Community Mapping Center, 2018a Mongolia: Internal Migration Study, Ulaanbaatar.
Ger Community Mapping Center, 2018b Mongolia: Urban Migrant Vulnerabiliy Assessment, Ulaanbaatar.
Golik K., 2011 Zagadnienia narodowościowe i językowe regionu Hölön Buir in: M. Pietrasik, M. Stańczyk (eds.), Problemy społeczno-gospodarcze Syberii, Łódź, pp. 105–118.
Golik K., 2014a Czym jest naród Państwa Środka? Zmiany narracji o stosunkach etnicznych w Chinach współczesnych, “Politeja” vol. 31/1, pp. 243–264.
Golik K., 2014b Facing the decline of minority languages: The new patterns of education of Mongols and Manchus, “Rocznik Orientalistyczny” vol. LXVII, issue 1, pp. 92–106.
Golik K., 2019 Chiny – ostatnie mocarstwo z przyszłością?, “Krytyka Polityczna”, https://krytykapolityczna.pl/swiat/katarzyna-golik-wielki-renesans-chiny-goralczyk/ (access: 31.10.2020).
Golik K., 2020 Chiński „naród”. Granice etnosu, “Wszystko Co Najważniejsze”, https://wszystkoconajwazniejsze.pl/katarzyna-golik-chinski-narod-granice-etnosu/?theme=wcn20 (access: 02.02.2021).
Humphrey C., Sneath D., 1999 The End of Nomadism? Society, State and the Environment in Inner Asia, Durham.
Hillman B., 2013 The Causes and Consequences of Rapid Urbanisation in an Ethnically Diverse Region: Case study of a county town in Yunnan, “China Perspectives” Special feature: The Urbanisation of Rural China, vol. 95 (3), pp. 25–32.
Jankowiak W., 1993 Sex, Death and Hierarchy in a Chinese City: An Anthropological Account, New York.
Ley, D., 1996 The New Middle Class and the Remaking of the Central City, Oxford.
Macrotrends, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia Metro Area Population 1950–2020, https://www.macrotrends. net/ (access: 4.12.2020).
Narenqimuge, Yi S., De H., 2013 Zouchu senlin caoyuan, Dawuerzu Renkou Chengshihua Yanjiu [Leaving forests and steppes, Studies of urbanisation of the Dagur population], Hohhot.
Plueckhahn R., 2020 Shaping Urban Futures in Mongolia Ulaanbaatar, Dynamic Ownership and Economic Flux, London.
Population, 2010 Hulunbuir Population, http://population.city/china/hulunbuir/ (access: 31.10.2020).
Rakowski T., 2016 Lokalne formy rozwoju, samoorganizacja i potencjał sprawczy, “Kultura i Rozwój”, vol. 1(1), pp. 89–108.
Rakowski T., 2016 2019 Przepływy współdziałania kręgi możliwego [Interoperability flows possible circles], Gdańsk.
Smith, N., 1979 Toward a Theory of Gentrification: A Back to the City Movement by Capital, Not People. “Journal of the American Planning Association”, vol. 45 (4), pp. 538–548.
Smith, N., 1996 The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City, London.
South China Morning Post, 2020 China’s New Urban Dwellers Really Still Live in the Countryside, Study Says, https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3044745/one-third-chinas-new-urban-dwellers-really-still-live (access: 31.10.2020).
Szynkiewicz S., 1981 Rodzina pasterska w Mongolii, Wrocław.
Szynkiewicz S., 2012 Zmiany polityki Chińskiej Republiki Ludowej wobec mniejszości etnicznych po 1978 roku: ku uznaniu odrębności kulturowych in: K. Gawlikowski, M. Ławacz (eds.), Wielkie przemiany w Chinach. Próba bilansu reform Deng Xiaopinga, Warszawa, pp. 175–203.
The Economist, 2020 Changes to China’s Hukou System are Creating New Divides, 19.08.2020.
Tsetsenbileg T., Purev T., Batjargal J. (eds.), 2014 Mongol dahi chotjlt, Uil javdal ba tolov baidal [Urbanisation of Mongolia, Process and State], Ulaanbaatar.
Whalley J., Zhang S., 2004 Inequality Change in China and (Hukou) Labour Mobility Restrictions, Working Paper 10683, Cambridge.
Xie Y., 2015 Ecological Migrants: The Relocation of China’s Ewenki Reindeer Herders, New York–Oxford.
Zhu Y., Lin M., Lin L., Chen J., 2013 The Extent of In Situ Urbanisation in China’s County Areas: The Case of Fujian Province, “China Perspectives” Special feature: The Urbanisation of Rural China, vol. 95 (3), pp. 43–52.
Zikmundová V., Kapišovská V., Khabtagaeva B., 2019 Hulun Buir: Its Ethnic and Linguistic Situation in: I. Peshkov (ed.), The Hulunbuir and Transbaikalia Playground. Microphysics of Power on the Sino-Russian Border, Poznań, pp. 21–46.
Zukin, S., 1991 Landscapes of Power: From Detroit to Disney World, Berkeley.
Informacje: Prace Etnograficzne, 2021, Tom 49 Numer 1-2, s. 37-62
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Polska Akademia Nauk
Polska
Publikacja: 2021
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND
Finansowanie artykułu:
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
AngielskiLiczba wyświetleń: 1096
Liczba pobrań: 725