Introduction: Kinship and Urbanization in Inner Asia

Ivan Peshkov; Zbigniew Szmyt

Introduction: Kinship and Urbanization in Inner Asia

Data publikacji: 2021

Prace Etnograficzne, 2021, Tom 49 Numer 1-2, s. 1 - 1

https://doi.org/10.4467/22999558.PE.21.001.14123

Autorzy

Pobierz pełny tekst

PDF

drukuj

Tytuły

Introduction: Kinship and Urbanization in Inner Asia

Abstrakt

* This issue is a result of the research project No.2017/25/B/HS3/00675 called “Kinship and Sedentarization in Inner Asian Urban Areas of Hailar, Ulan-Ude and Ulaanbaatar” funded by the Polish National Science Center.

Bibliografia

Pobierz bibliografię

Bhalla A.S., Shufang Qiu

2009 Poverty and Inequality among Chinese Minorities, London–New York.

Breslavsky A.

2012 Post-Soviet Ulan-Ude: Content and Meaning of a New Urban Idea, “Inner Asia”, vol. 14 (2), pp. 299–317.

Brown, R.J.

1998 Culture, Chaos and Capitalism: Privatization in Kazakhstan, “Journal of International Law”, vol. 19 (4), pp. 909–964.

Bulag, U.E.

2002 From Yeke-juu league to Ordos municipality: settler colonialism and alter/native urbanization in Inner Mongolia, “Provincial China”, vol. 7 (2), pp. 196–234.

Humphrey C.

1998 Marx Went Away, but Karl Stayed Behind, Ann Arbor.

2002 The Unmaking of Soviet Life: Everyday Economies After Socialism, Cornell.

Humphrey C., Mandel R. (eds.)

2002 The Market in Everyday Life: Ethnographies of Postsocialism in: Markets and Moralities: Ethnographies of Postsocialism, Oxford, pp. 1–16.

Lefebvre H.

2003 The Urban Revolution, Minneapolis.

Lu D.

2006 Remaking Chinese Urban Form: Modernity, Scarcity and Space, 1949–2005, London–New York.

Mashbat S.

2004 Mongolia: Managing the Transition from Nomadic to Settled Culture in: J. Rolfe (ed.), The Asia-Pacific: A Region in Transition, Honolulu, pp. 323–334.

Peshkov I.

2011 From ‘Border Socialism’ to ‘Border Capitalism’: Past Dependency in the Inner-Asia Border Triangle, “Sensus Historiae”, vol. 3 (2), pp. 139–148.

2014 Usable Past for a Transbaikalian Borderline Town. “Disarmament” of Memory and Geographical Imagination in Priargunsk, “Inner Asia”, vol. 16 (1), pp. 95–115.

Plueckhahn R., Bumochir D.

2018 Capitalism in Mongolia – Ideology, Practice and Ambiguity, “Central Asian Survey”, vol. 37 (3), pp. 341–356.

Quijada J.

2019 Buddhists, Shamans, and Soviets: Rituals of History in Post-Soviet Buryatia, New York.

Szmyt Z.

2017 Urban Shamanism in Siberia: The Dialectic of Placemaking and Fieldwork, “Historia@Teoria”, vol. 3 (5): Post-Socialist City. Between Past and Future, pp. 85–126.

2019 Restoring Cultural Continuity: Cultural Heritage in Post-Socialist Inner Asia in: I. Peshkov (ed.), The Hulunbuir and Transbaikalia Playground. Microphysics of Power on the Sino-Russian Border, Poznań, pp. 61–87.

Informacje

Informacje: Prace Etnograficzne, 2021, Tom 49 Numer 1-2, s. 1 - 1

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/22999558.PE.21.001.14123

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:

Introduction: Kinship and Urbanization in Inner Asia

Angielski:

Introduction: Kinship and Urbanization in Inner Asia

Autorzy

Ivan Peshkov

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8923-1937

Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań

Zbigniew Szmyt

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6658-0317

Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań

Publikacja: 2021

Status artykułu: Otwarte

Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND

Udział procentowy autorów:

Ivan Peshkov (Autor) - 50%

Zbigniew Szmyt (Autor) - 50%

Korekty artykułu:

Języki publikacji:

Angielski

Liczba wyświetleń: 727

Liczba pobrań: 718

<div id="cke_pastebin"> Introduction: Kinship and Urbanization in Inner Asia</div>

Pobierz xml