In the presented text, the author discusses a modest proposal of practicing the humanities that was developed by him. Anthropo-graphy, as the name suggests, is a combination of the two terms of anthropology and ethnography. It is also their specific synthesis and reduction. The very name suggests the meaning – it reveals author’s idea as well as his research and writing attitude. Anthropos – anthropology “unburdened” from logos (in the sense of law) as a nomothetic science that seeks universal and objective laws governing the reality under study. The author wanted to redirect this way of thinking and go beyond this way of understanding anthropology. Secondly, ethnography without the ethno prefix, which also suggests a specific tradition of thinking, which the author also wanted to give up while remaining with the term graphia, graphos referring to description and writing. Because anthropography is all about recording, describing human (cultural) reality and for documentation, registration of activities, manifestations, experiences, relationships that define contemporary people. Combining these two research attitudes, directions of thinking and observing the city in research, the author developed his own methodological proposal, the model of anthropography. A model based on several postulates. A model that is constantly evolving, open, emerging and summarizing what the author thinks is necessary, which should be taken into account when conducting research activities. Anthropography is an idiosyncratic description, documentation of methods, not only of practicing scientific creativity, but more importantly, a record of ways of cultivating existence, tracing its course revealed in human activities, cultivating culture (referring to the etymology of this concept), which enables a person to act in the world, functioning in relation to oneself, to another person and to the broadly understood community; collective.