Mówiąc o zmarłych : szczątki ludzkie jako dziedzictwo w kontekście Singapuru
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEData publikacji: 29.06.2024
Gdańskie Studia Azji Wschodniej, 2024, Zeszyt 25, s. 135 - 156
https://doi.org/10.4467/23538724GS.24.009.19870Autorzy
Speaking of the dead: Human remains as heritage in the Singapore context
This article considers, in the Singapore context, the legal status of unburied human remains having heritage value, which might be in the form of a deceased person’s corpse that has not been interred; or preserved remains, possibly in a museum or a private collection. It is submitted that, following the guided discretion approach adopted in recent cases concerning human tissue obtained from living human beings, such human remains should be regarded as having the status of property. This would, among other things, enable civil and criminal proceedings to be pursued in domestic law if such remains are removed from archaeological sites or museums without authorization, and for international frameworks facilitating the return of illicitly exported cultural objects to apply. The article also looks at the status of buried human remains, grave goods and funerary monuments, and guidelines concerning the proper treatment of remains in a museum setting. Provided that the interests and beliefs of the community, ethnic or religious groups from whom human remains originated are considered, research into human remains and their sensitive display in museums are important ways for us to learn more about our origins and ourselves.
Bazley v. Wesley Monash IVF Pty Ltd [2011] 2 Qd R 207 (Supreme Court, Queensland)
Dobson v. North Tyneside Health Authority [1996] EWCA Civ 1301, [1997] 1 WLR 596 (Court of Appeal, England and Wales)
Doodeward v. Spence (1908) 6 CLR 406 (High Court, Australia)
Elitestone v. Morris [1997] 1 WLR 687 (House of Lords, United Kingdom)
Elwes v. Brigg Gas Co (1886) 33 Ch D 562 (High Court (Chancery Division), England and Wales)
Estate of Tupuna Maori, Warrior (unreported, 19 May 1988) (High Court, New Zealand)
Exelby v. Handyside (Dr Handyside’s Case) (1749) 2 East PC 652
Falcke v. Scottish Imperial Insurance Co (1886) 34 Ch D 234 (Court of Appeal, England and Wales)
Foster v. Dodd (1867) LR 3 QB 67, (High Court (Exchequer Chamber), England and Wales)
Greenwood v. Bennett [1973] QB 195 (Court of Appeal, England and Wales)
HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Singapore) Ltd v. Chief Assessor [2019] SGHC 95, [2020] 3 SLR 510 (High Court, Singapore)
HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Singapore) Ltd v. Chief Assessor [2020] SGCA 10, [2020] 1 SLR 621 (Court of Appeal, Singapore)
Kwan Chun Investments v. Sik Tak Kwong [2021] HKCFI 714 (High Court (Court of First Instance), (Hong Kong)
Parker v. British Airways Board [1982] QB 1004 (Court of Appeal, England and Wales)
Pierce v. Proprietors of Swan Point Cemetery 10 RI 227; 14 Am Rep 667 (1872) (Supreme Court in Equity, Rhode Island)
Polhemus v. Daly 296 SW 442 (1927) (Court of Appeals, Missouri)
R. v. Bentham [2005] UKHL 18, [2005] 1 WLR 1057 (House of Lords, United Kingdom)
R. v. Jacobson (1880) 14 Cox CC 522 (High Court (Queen’s Bench Division), England and Wales)
R. v. Kelly [1998] EWCA Crim 1578, [1999] QB 621 (Court of Appeal, England and Wales)
R. v. Price (1884) 12 QBD 247 (High Court (Queen’s Bench Division), England and Wales)
R. v. Sharpe (1857) Dears & Bell 160, 169 ER 959 (High Court, England and Wales)
Re Edwards [2011] NSWSC 478, (2011) 81 NSWLR 198 (Supreme Court, New South Wales)
Re H, AE (No. 2) [2012] SASC 177 (Supreme Court, South Australia)
Re Lee [2017] NZHC 3263, [2018] 2 NZLR 731 (High Court, New Zealand)
Re Tasmanian Aboriginal Centre (2007) 16 Tas R 139; [2007] TASSC 5 (Supreme Court, Tasmania)
Roche v. Douglas (2000) 22 WAR 331 (Supreme Court, Western Australia)
Smith v. Tamworth City Council (1997) 41 NSWLR 680 (Supreme Court, Equity Division, New South Wales)
Waverley Borough Council v. Fletcher [1995] QB 334 (Court of Appeal, England and Wales)
Williams v. Williams (1882) 20 Ch D 659 (High Court (Chancery Division), England and Wales)
Yearworth v. North Bristol NHS Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 37, [2010] QB 1, (Court of Appeal, England and Wales)
Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict adopted in Hague on 14 May 1954, together with its implementing regulations; the Protocol for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict
Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property adopted in Paris on 14 November 1970
UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects adopted in Rome on 24 June 1995
Penal Code 1871 (Singapore)
Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order and Nuisance) Act 1906 (Singapore)
Land Acquisition Ordinance (Cap. 248, 1955 Rev. Ed.), now the Land Acquisition Act 1966 (Singapore)
Land Acquisition (Amendment) Ordinance 1964 (No. 1 of 1964; Singapore)
Administration of Muslim Law Act 1966 (Singapore)
Municipal Ordinance 1896 (Ordinance XV of 1896; Straits Settlements)
Burial Ordinance 1896 (Ordinance XIX of 1896; Straits Settlements)
Firearms Act 1968 (1968 c. 27; United Kingdom)
Environmental Public Health Act 1987 (Singapore)
Human Organ Transplant Act 1987 (Singapore)
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 (1990 c. 37; United Kingdom)
National Heritage Board Act 1993 (Singapore)
Human Cloning and Other Prohibited Practices Act 2004 (Singapore)
Human Biomedical Research Act 2015 (Singapore)
ASEAN Declaration on Cultural Heritage adopted on 25 July 2000
Law Commission (New Zealand), Coroners (NZLC R62), Law Commission, Wellington 2000
Vientiane Declaration on Reinforcing Cultural Heritage Cooperation in ASEAN adopted on 6 September 2016
Barker E.W., “Acquisition of Private Cemeteries (Statement by the Minister for Law, the Environment and Science and Technology)”, Singapore Parliamentary Debates, Official Report, 7 April 1978, col. 1491
“Environment”, Department of Statistics Singapore, 31 January 2023, https://www.singstat.gov.sg/find-data/search-by-theme/society/environment/latest-data (accessed: 15.05.2023)
Falconer K., “Dismantling Doodeward: Guided Discretion as the Superior Basis for Property Rights in Human Biological Material”, University of New South Wales Law Journal 2019, vol. 42, no. 3
Gallagher S., “Museums and the Return of Human Remains: An Equitable Solution?”, International Journal of Cultural Property 2010, vol. 17, p. 65
Guidance for the Care of Human Remains in Museums, Department of Culture, Media and Sport, London 2005, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5f291770e90e0732e4bd8b76/GuidanceHumanRemains11Oct.pdf (accessed: 1.05.2024)
“Human Biomedical Research Bill”, Singapore Parliamentary Debates, Official Report, 17–18 August 2015, vol. 93
Human Remains Policy, National Museum of Ireland, Dublin 2019, https://www.museum.ie/getmedia/80bd1b97-7ffb-4bac-adf9-c45f71041611/NMI-Human-Remains-Policy-2019-2023-FINAL.pdf (accessed: 1.05.2024)
ICOM Code of Ethics for Museums, International Council of Museums, Paris 2017, https://icom.museum/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/ICOM-code-En-web.pdf (accessed: 15.01.2024)
Lee P.W., “Interference with Goods” [in:] G.K.Y. Chan, P.W. Lee, The Law of Torts in Singapore, 2nd edn., Academy Publishing, Singapore 2016
Lim C.S., Preliminary Report on the Archaeological Investigations at the Victoria Concert Hall (Archaeology Report Series; 9), Archaeology Unit, Nalanda-Sriwijaya Centre, ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, Singapore 2019
Matthews P., “Whose Body? People as Property”, Current Legal Problems 1983, vol. 36, no. 1 “Media Advisory: Fright Night Descends on the Asian Civilisations Museum”, Asian Civilisations Museum, 24 October 2008, https://www.nhb.gov.sg/acm/-/media/acm/document/aboutus/media/press-releases/2008-3.ashx (accessed: 1.05.2024)
O’Keefe P.J., “Maoris Claim Head”, International Journal of Cultural Property 1992, vol. 1, no. 2
Olesen A., “Singapore Digs Up the Dead – 58,000 of Them – to Make Room for the Living”, Associated Press Newswires, 12 May 2002
Shariatmadari D., “‘They’re Not Property’: The People who Want Their Ancestors back from British Museums”, The Guardian, 23 April 2019, https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2019/apr/23/theyre-not-property-the-people-who-want-their-ancestors-back-from-british-museums (accessed: 1.05.2024)
“Singapore’s History to be Scattered at Sea”, The Sydney Morning Herald, Sydney, N.S.W., 21 August 2004, https://www.smh.com.au/world/singapores-history-to-be-scattered-at-sea-20040821-gdjlef.html (accessed: 1.05.2024)
Tan I.Y.H., “Dignity after Death: Treating Human Remains with Respect”, BeMuse 2014, vol. 7, no. 4, https://www.academia.edu/24477910/Dignity_After_Death_Treating_Human_Remains_with_Respect_in_Singapore_Museums (accessed: 1.05.2024)
Tan K.Y.L., “Introduction: The Death of Cemeteries in Singapore” [in:] Spaces of the Dead: A Case from the Living, ed. K.Y.L. Tan, Singapore Heritage Society, Ethos Books, Singapore 2011
Teo-Jacob M., “Singapore War Dead under Eviction Orders”, The Australian, Surry Hills, N.S.W., 19 April 2001
TXY [pseudonym], “Re-presenting Native Culture”, Artxy, 10 December 2010, http://www.artxy.com/2010/12/re-presenting-native-culture.html (accessed: 1.05.2024)
Informacje: Gdańskie Studia Azji Wschodniej, 2024, Zeszyt 25, s. 135 - 156
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
ICOMOS Singapore
Singapur
Publikacja: 29.06.2024
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
AngielskiLiczba wyświetleń: 204
Liczba pobrań: 96