FAQ

Teren marzeń. Antropolog daleko w domu

Data publikacji: 2017

Etnografia. Praktyki, Teorie, Doświadczenia, 2016, Numer 2/2016, s. 211-231

https://doi.org/10.4467/254395379EPT.16.012.6491

Autorzy

JoAnn D'Alisera
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Tłumacze

Michał Żerkowski

Tytuły

Teren marzeń. Antropolog daleko w domu

Abstrakt

The extent to which personal narrative is seen as a valid component of ethnography has been debated by generations of anthropologists. Critics contend that self-reflection trivializes the text, while supporters assert that self-reflection mediates contradictions between personal and scientific authority inherent in the discipline. Through such self-reflection and description, this essay challenges the basic fieldwork narrative in which notions of distance/nearness and foreign/native are imagined as bounded categories of experience.

Bibliografia

Pobierz bibliografię

Appadurai, A. (1988). Theory in Anthropology: Center and Periphery. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 28(1), 356–361.

Appadurai, A. (1991). Global Ethnoscapes: Notes and Queries for a Transnational Anthropology. W: R. Fox (ed.), Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present (pp. 191–210). Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.

Certeau de, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. Trans. by S. Rendall. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Clifford, J. (1992). Travelling Cultures. W: L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, P. Treichler (eds.), Cultural  Studies (pp. 96–116). New York: Routledge.

D’Alisera, J. (1997). The Transnational Search for Muslim Identity: Sierra Leoneans in Americans Capital. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

D’Alisera, J. (1998). Born in the USA: Naming Ceremonies of Infants among Sierra Leoneans Living in the American Capital. Anthropology Today, 14(1), 16–18.

D’Amico-Samuels, D. (1991). Undoing Fieldwork: Personal, Political, Theoretical and Methodological Implications. W: F.V. Harrison (ed.), Decolonizing Anthropology: Moving Further Toward an Anthropology for Liberation (s. 68–87). Washington, D.C.: American Anthropological Association, Association of Black Anthropologists.

Gottlieb, A., Graham, P. (1993). Parallel Worlds: An Anthropologist and a Writer Encounter Africa. New York: Crown.

Gupta, A., Ferguson, J. (1992). Beyond „Culture”: Space, Identity, and the Politics of Difference. Cultural Anthropology, 7(1), 6–23.

Gupta, A., Ferguson, J. (1997). Discipline and Practice: „The Field” as Site, Method, and Location in Anthropology. W: A. Gupta, J. Ferguson (eds.), Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science (pp. 1–46). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Lavie, S., Swedenburg, T. (1996). Introduction: Displacement, Diaspora, and Geographies of Identity. W: S. Lavie and T. Swedenburg (eds.), Displacement, Diaspora, and Geographies  of Identity (pp. 1–26). Durham: Duke University Press.

Marcus, G. (1986). Contemporary Problems of Ethnography in the Modem World System. W: J. Clifford, G. Marcus (eds.), Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography (pp. 165–193). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Marcus, G. (1995). Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117.

Marcus, G. (1996). Connected: Engagements with Media. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Myerhoff, B. (1978). Number Our Days. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Okely, J. (1984). Fieldwork in the Home Counties. Royal Anthropological Institute Newsletter, 61, 4–6.

Olwig, K.F., Hastrup, K. (1997). Introduction. W: K.F. Olwig, K. Hastrup (eds.), Siting Culture:  The Shifting Anthropological Object (pp. 1–16). London: Routledge.

Ortner, S. (1997). Fieldwork in the Postcommunity. Anthropology and Humanism, 22(l), 61–80.

Passaro, J. (1997). „You Can?t Take the Subway to the Field!”: „Village” Epistemologies in the Global Village. W: A. Gupta, J. Ferguson (eds.), Anthropological Locations: Boundaries andGrounds of a Field Science (pp. 147–162). Berkeley:University of California Press.

Rosaldo, R. (1988). Ideology, Place and People without Culture. Cultural Anthropology, 3(l), 77–87.

Schwartz, L.S. (1996). Only Connect?. In: S. Birkerts (ed.), Tolstoy’s Dictaphone: Technology and the Muse (pp. 128–146). St. Paul: Graywolf Press.

Stoller, P. (1996). Spaces, Places, and Fields: The Politics of West African Trading in New York City’s Informal Economy. American Anthropologist, 98(4), 776–788.

Stoller, P. (1997). Globalizing Method: The Problems of Doing Ethnography in Transnational Spaces. Anthropology and Humanism, 22(l), 81–94.

Strathern, M. (1987). The Limits of Auto-Anthropology. W: A. Jackson (ed.), Anthropology at Home. ASA Monograph, 25 (pp. 16–37). London: Tavistock Publications.

Informacje

Informacje: Etnografia. Praktyki, Teorie, Doświadczenia, 2016, Numer 2/2016, s. 211-231

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:

Teren marzeń. Antropolog daleko w domu

Angielski:

Field of dreams: An anthropologist far away at home

Autorzy

University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA

Publikacja: 2017

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: Żadna

Udział procentowy autorów:

JoAnn D'Alisera (Autor) - 50%
Michał Żerkowski (Tłumacz) - 50%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Polski

Liczba wyświetleń: 1923

Liczba pobrań: 1372

<p>Teren marzeń. Antropolog daleko w domu</p>