Renewing Realist Constructivism: Does It Have Potential as a Theory of Foreign Policy?

Eva Michaels

Renewing Realist Constructivism: Does It Have Potential as a Theory of Foreign Policy?

Data publikacji: 19.09.2022

Teoria Polityki, 2022, Nr 6/2022, s. 101 - 122

https://doi.org/10.4467/25440845TP.22.006.16006

Autorzy

Pobierz pełny tekst

PDF

drukuj

Tytuły

Renewing Realist Constructivism: Does It Have Potential as a Theory of Foreign Policy?

Abstrakt

This article raises the possibility of de- and reconstructing realist constructivism for the purpose of studying foreign policy, with an emphasis on explaining and forecasting change and continuity. I discuss why Samuel Barkin’s explication of realist constructivism has in my view struggled to take off as an IR perspective and which tenets appear problematic, especially when applying them to foreign policy. I suggest a way of revitalising realist constructivism across three layers of theorising: political ontology, explanatory theory, and praxis. Constructivism’s “open ontology”offers a meeting point with classical realism, together with its (less deterministic and more interpretivist) explanatory approach. Classical realism adds to the third layer with its focus on practice sensibility, including the choices actors make in highly uncertain contexts. Its strong interest in discovering the truth of politics is important here. I argue that such a synthesis, which is informed by Ned Lebow’s conceptualisation of causation as “inefficient”, could be well-suited to unpack the complex reality of foreign policy. I seek to make the case for realist constructivism as a dynamic thinking tool, among others when investigating the effects of material, intersubjective and subjective factors on foreign policy decisions and outcomes. While my propositions can only be sketched here, the goal is to encourage further debate about the value of realist constructivism, which has ebbed since the mid-2000s.

Słowa kluczowe

realist constructivism, classical realism, constructivism, foreign policy, practice, inefficient causation

Bibliografia

Pobierz bibliografię

Adler, E. (1997). “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics”. European Journal of International Relations, 3(3), pp. 319–363.

Adler, E. (2002). “Constructivism and International Relations”. In: W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, B.A. Simmons (eds.). Handbook of International Relations. 2008 Reprint. London: Sage, pp. 95–118.

Adler, E. (2012). “Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions, and Debates”. In: W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, B.A. Simmons (eds.). Handbook of International Relations. 2nd ed. London: Sage, pp. 112–144.

Adler, E., Pouliot, V. (2011). “International Practices”. International Theory, 3(1), pp. 1–36.

Adler-Nissen, R., Pouliot, V. (2014). “Power in Practice: Negotiating the International Intervention in Libya”. European Journal of International Relations, 20(4), pp. 889–911.

Aron, R. (1973). Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations. New York: Anchor.

Bano, S. (2020). “The India-US Nuclear Deal: Norms of Power and the Power of Norms”. In: J.S. Barkin (ed.). The Social Construction of State Power: Applying Realist Constructivism. Bristol: Bristol University Press, pp. 100–118.

Barkin, J.S. (2003). “Realist Constructivism”. International Studies Review, 5(3), pp. 325–342.

Barkin, J.S. (2004). “Realist Constructivism and Realist-Constructivisms”. International Studies Review, 6(2), pp. 349–352.

Barkin, J.S. (2010). Realist Constructivism: Rethinking International Relations Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barkin, J.S. (2020). Constructivist Neoclassical Realisms. In: J.S. Barkin (ed.). The Social Construction of State Power: Applying Realist Constructivism. Bristol: Bristol University Press, pp. 50–72.

Berenskoetter, F., Hoef, Y. van (2017). “Friendship and Foreign Policy”. In: C. Thies (ed.). Oxford Encyclopedia of Foreign Policy Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Beyerchen, A.D. (1992). “Clausewitz, Nonlinearity and the Unpredictability of War”. International Security, 17(3), pp. 59–90.

Bially Mattern, J. (2004). “Power in Realist-Constructivist Research”. International Studies Review, 6(2), pp. 343–346.

Boyle, M. (2019). Republic of China Independence (Huadu): A Realist-Constructivist Account of Taiwan’s Maintenance of Its de facto Independence. PhD thesis, University of Kent.

Boyle, M. (2020). “Huadu: A Realist Constructivist Account of Taiwan’s Anomalous Status”. In: J.S. Barkin (ed.). The Social Construction of State Power: Applying Realist Constructivism. Bristol: Bristol University Press, pp. 73–99.

Bueger, C. (2022). “Styles of Theorizing International Practice”. In: G. Hellmann, J. Steffek (eds.). Praxis as a Perspective on International Politics. Bristol: Bristol University Press, pp. 51–71.

Carlsnaes, W. (1992). “The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis”. International Studies Quarterly, 36(3), pp. 245–270.

Carr, E.H. (1940). The Twenty Years’ Crisis 1919–1939. London: Macmillan.

Checkel, J.T. (1997). “International Norms and Domestic Politics: Bridging the Rationalist-Constructivist Divide”. European Journal of International Relations, 3(4), pp. 473–495.

Clausewitz, C. von (1873). On War, trans. J.J. Graham, http://www.clausewitz.com/readings/OnWar1873/TOC.htm (accessed: 20.10.2018).

Cross, M.K.D. (2011). Security Integration in Europe: How Knowledge-Based Networks Are Transforming the European Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Delacour, J.O. (2020). Taking Co-constitution Seriously: Explaining an Ambiguous US Approach to Latin America. In: J.S. Barkin (ed.). The Social Construction of State Power: Applying Realist Constructivism. Bristol: Bristol University Press, pp. 140–160.

Economides, S. (2019). “Explaining the European Union’s Foreign Policy: A Practice Theory of Translocal Action”. International Affairs, 95(2), pp. 493–494.

Ekengren, M. (2018). Explaining the European Union’s Foreign Policy: A Practice Theory of Translocal Action. Cambridge University Press.

Fearon, J., Wendt, A. (2002). “Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View”. In: W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, B.A. Simmons (eds.). Handbook of International Relations. Reprint. London: Sage, pp. 52–72.

Fierke, K.M. (2007). “Constructivism”. In: T. Dunne, M. Kurki, S. Smith (eds.). International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 166–184.

Goldgeier, J., Tetlock, P. (2001). “Psychology and International Relations Theory”. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, pp. 67–92.

Gow, J. (2017). “The Essence of Strategy: Constructivist Realism and Necessity”. In: B. Wilkinson, J. Gow (eds.). The Art of Creating Power: Freedman on Strategy. London: Hurst, pp. 259–278.

Guzzini, S. (2007). “The Concept of Power: A Constructivist Analysis”. In: F. Berenskoetter, M.J. Williams (eds.). Power in World Politics. London–New York: Routledge, pp. 23–42.

Guzzini, S. (2020). “Saving Realist Prudence”. In: J.S. Barkin (ed.). The Social Construction of State Power: Applying Realist Constructivism. Bristol: Bristol University Press, pp. 202–218.

Hay, C. (2002). Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Houghton, D.P. (2007). “Reinvigorating the Study of Foreign Policy Decision Making: Toward a Constructivist Approach”. Foreign Policy Analysis, 3(1), pp. 24–45.

Howorth, J. (2004). “Discourse, Ideas, and Epistemic Communities in European Security and Defence Policy”. West European Politics, 27(2), pp. 211–34.

Hudson, V.M. (2014). Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

Jackson, P.T. (2016). The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.

Jackson, P.T, Nexon, D.H. (2004). “Constructivist Realism or Realist-Constructivism?”. International Studies Review, 6(2), pp. 337–341.

Jorgensen, K.E., Hellmann, G. (2015a). “Introduction”. In: K.E. Jorgensen, G. Hellmann (eds.). Theorizing Foreign Policy in a Globalized World. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 1–11.

Jorgensen, K.E., Hellmann, G. (eds.) (2015b). Theorizing Foreign Policy in a Globalized World. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Jupille, J., Caporaso, J.A., Checkel, J.T. (2003). “Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union”. Comparative Politics, 36 (1–2), pp. 7–40.

Lebow, R.N. (2001). “Thucydides the Constructivist”. The American Political Science Review, 95(3), pp. 547–560.

Lebow, R.N. (2003). The Tragic Vision of Politics: Ethics, Interests and Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lebow, R.N. (2004). “Constructive Realism”. International Studies Review, 6(3), pp. 346–348.

Lebow, R.N. (2007). “Texts, Paradigms, and Political Change”. In: M.C. Williams (ed.). Realism Reconsidered: The Legacy of Hans Morgenthau in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 241–268.

Lebow, R.N. (2014). Constructing Cause in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Legro, J.W. (2000). “Whence American Internationalism”. International Organization, 54(2), pp. 253–289.

Marsella, A.J. (2013). “All Psychologies Are Indigenous Psychologies: Reflections on Psychology in a Global Era”. Psychology International, https://www.apa.org/international/pi/2013/12/reflections (accessed: 30.06.2022).

Martin, N. (2019). “From Containment to Realpolitik and Back Again: A Realist Constructivist Analysis of Turkey-EU Relations and the Migration Issue”. Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(6), pp. 1349–1365.

McCourt, D.M. (2016). “Practice Theory and Relationalism as the New Constructivism”. International Studies Quarterly, 60(3), pp. 475–485.

McCourt, D.M. (2022). The New Constructivism in International Relations Theory. Bristol: Bristol University Press.

Mercer, J. (1995). “Anarchy and Identity”. International Organization, 49(2), pp. 229–252.

Meyer, C.O., Strickmann, E. (2011). “Solidifying Constructivism: How Material and Ideational Factors Interact in European Defence”. Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(1), pp. 61–81.

Michael, A. (2018). “Realist-Constructivism and the India-Pakistan Conflict: A New Theoretical Approach for an Old Rivalry”. Asian Politics & Policy, 10(1), pp. 100–114.

Morgenthau, H.J. (1960). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 3rd ed. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Pouliot, V. (2010). International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Prieto, G. (2020). “Causation in Realist Constructivism: Interactionality, Emergence and the Need for Interpretation”. In: J.S. Barkin (ed.). The Social Construction of State Power: Applying Realist Constructivism. Bristol: Bristol University Press, pp. 26–49.

Schmitt, O. (2018). “A Theory of International Relations or a Theory of Foreign Policy? Reading Peace and War Amongst Nations”. In: O. Schmitt (ed.). Raymond Aron and International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 53–69.

Shannon, V.P., Kowert, P.A. (eds.) (2011). Psychology and Constructivism in International Relations: An Ideational Alliance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Sjoberg, L. (2020). “Permutations and Combinations in Theorizing Global Politics: Whither Realist Constructivism”. In: J.S. Barkin (ed.). The Social Construction of State Power: Applying Realist Constructivism. Bristol: Bristol University Press, pp. 180–201.

Sterling-Folker, J. (2002). “Realism and the Constructivist Challenge: Rejecting, Reconstructing, or Rereading”. International Studies Review, 4(1), pp. 73–97.

Sterling-Folker, J. (2004). “Realist-Constructivism and Morality”. International Studies Review, 6(2), pp. 341–343.

Troy, J. (2021). “The Realist Science of Politics: The Art of Understanding Political Practice”. European Journal of International Relations, 27(4), pp. 1193–1217.

Ty, S., Steele, B.J. (2017). “Micro-moves in International Relations Theory”. European Journal of International Relations, 23(2), pp. 267–291.

Wei, C. (2020). “Coercive Engagement: Lessons from US Policy Towards China”. In: J.S. Barkin (ed.). The Social Construction of State Power: Applying Realist Constructivism. Bristol: Bristol University Press, pp. 119–139.

Wendt, A.E. (1987). “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory”. International Organization, 41(3), pp. 335–370.

Wendt, A.E. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Informacje

Informacje: Teoria Polityki, 2022, Nr 6/2022, s. 101 - 122

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/25440845TP.22.006.16006

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:

Renewing Realist Constructivism: Does It Have Potential as a Theory of Foreign Policy?

Angielski:

Renewing Realist Constructivism: Does It Have Potential as a Theory of Foreign Policy?

Autorzy

Eva Michaels

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8795-156X

The Institut Barcelona d’Estudis Internacionals (IBEI), Barcelona, Hiszpania

Publikacja: 19.09.2022

Status artykułu: Otwarte

Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND

Udział procentowy autorów:

Eva Michaels (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

Języki publikacji:

Angielski

Liczba wyświetleń: 2537

Liczba pobrań: 778

<p> Renewing Realist Constructivism: Does It Have Potential as a Theory of Foreign Policy?</p>

Pobierz xml