[1] Anderson, R. W. G., Streeter, L. D., Ponte, G., McLean, A. J. (2007). Pedestrian reconstruction using multibody MADYMO simulation and the Polar-II dummy: a comparison of head kinematics. Proceedings of the 20th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Lyon, France, 18–21.

[2] Becker, T., Reade, M., Scurlock, B. (2015). Simulations of Pedestrian Impact Collisions with Virtual CRASH 3 and Comparisons with IPTM Staged Tests. Accident Reconstruction Journal, 26 (2). Pobrano z: http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.00790 (dostęp: 25 maja 2022 r.).

[3] Bodolo, I., Nenad, M., Bodolo, T., Dejan, H. (2009). Drugi eksperiment realnog sudara drumskih vozila u R Srbiji. Pobrano z: https://www.vestacenja.co.rs/docs/sudar_r4_bicikl.pdf (dostęp: 25 maja 2022 r.).

[4] EuroNCAP. (2021). Assessment Protocol – Vulnerable Road User Protection. Version  10.0.5.4 https://www.welt.de/wirtschaft/webwelt/article236020958/Biofidel-Dummys-Crashtests-werdenzunehmend-realistischer.html.

[5] Foster, C. D. (2022). Report on Generic Hull Live-Fire Test with PRIMUS Dummy. Pobrano z: https://www.crashtest-service.com/download-file?file_id=2128&file_code=42de3e4d85 (dostęp 15 maja 2022 r.).

[6] Fredriksson, R., Håland, Y., Yang, J. (2001). Evaluation of a new pedestrian head injury protection system with a sensor in the bumper and lifting of the bonnet’s rear part. Proceedings of the 17th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles.

[7] Hartwig, S., Knape, M., Kunze, A., Weyde, M. (2017). Interdisciplinary further development of an optimised anthropomorphic pedestrian surrogate for full-scale crash tests. Proceedings 26th EVU-Congress, Haarlem, Netherlands.

[8] Kasanický, G., Kohut, P. (2009). New Partial Overlap Pedestrian Impact Tests. Proceedings 18th EVU Congress, Hinckley, UK.

[9] Kortmann, A. (2019). The New Biofidelic Dummy In Different Scenarios Of Accidents Involving Pas-senger Cars And Pedestrians. Collision Magazine, 13 (2).

[10] Kortmann, A. (2020). Comparison of occupant load in a frontal collision with different degrees of belt usage. 9. Sachverständigenseminar.

[11] Moser, A., Steffan, H., Kasanický, G. (1999). The pedestrian model in PC-Crash – The introduction of a multi body system and its validation. SAE Technical Papers, 794–802. DOI: 10.4271/1999-01-0445.

[12] Moser, A., Hoschopf, H., Steffan, H., Kasanicky, G. (2000). Validation of the PCCrash Pedestrian Model. SAE Technical Papers, 1316–1339. DOI: 10.4271/ 2000-01-0847.

[13] Moser, A., Steffan, H., Strzeletz, R. (2009). Movement of the Human Body versus Dummy after the Collision. Proceedings 18th EVU Congress, Hinckley, UK.

[14] Notsu, M., Nishimoto, T., Konosu, A., Ishikawa, H. (2005). J-MLIT Research onto a Pedestrian Lower Extremity Protection-Evaluation Tests for Pedestrian Legform Impactors. Proceedings: International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Washington.

[15] Schäuble, A. (2019). Crash test dummies – how realistic are currently used dummies? Master Thesis. TU Wien.

[16] Schäuble, A., Hartwig, S., Weyde, M. (2021). Der Biofidel-Dummy als Fahrradfahrer-Surrogat: Vorläufige Ergebnisse zur Korrelation zwischen Dummybeschädigungen und Verletzungen von Radfahrern. Verkehrsunfall und Fahrzeugtechnik, 12.

[17] UN ECE. (2018). Regulation no. 127/02 (Rev. 2) – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to their pedestrian safety performance.