Allen Sh.E.M. 1996. Aspects of argument structure acquisition in Inukitut. Philadelphia.

Boček V. 2014. Praslovanština a jazykový kontakt. Prague.

Boduèn-dè-Kurtenè I. [= Baudouin de Courtenay J.N.I.]. 1875. Opyt fonetiki rez’janskix govorov. Warsaw, St. Petersburg.

Capell A. 1965. A typology of concept domination. – Lingua 15.5: 451–462.

Comrie B. 2008. Inflectional morphology and language contact, with special reference to mixed languages. – Simund P., Kintana N. (eds.). Language contact and contact languages. Amsterdam: 15–32.

Dahl Ö. 2004. The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam, Philadelphia.

Danylenko A. 2000/1997. The genitive of agent and the instrumental of means in Old Ukrain­ian: An old idea worth revising? – General Linguistics 37.1: 41–70.

Danylenko A. 2002. The East Slavic ‘HAVE’: Revising a developmental scenario. – Jones-Bley K. et al. (eds.). Proceedings of the 13th Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference; Los Angeles, November 9–10, 2001. Washington: 105–127.

Danylenko A. 2003. Predykaty, vidminky i diatezy v ukrajins’kij movi: istoryčnyj i typolohičnyj aspekty. Kharkiv.

Danylenko A. 2005a. Is there any possessive perfect in North Russian? – Word 56.3: 347–379.

Danylenko A. 2005b. Impersonal constructions with the accusative case in Lithuanian and Slavic (A reply to Axel Holvoet). – Zeitschrift für Slawistik 50.2: 147–160.

Danylenko A. 2006. Slavica et islamica: Ukrainian in context. München.

Danylenko A. 2011. Is there any inflectional future in East Slavic? A case of Ukrainian against Romance reopened. – Nomachi M. (ed.). Grammaticalization in Slavic languages. Sapporo: 147–177.

Danylenko A. 2012. Auxiliary clitics in Southwest Ukrainian: Questions of chronology, areal distribution, and grammaticalization. – Journal of Slavic Linguistics 20.1: 3–34.

Danylenko A. 2013. Ukrainian in the language map of Central Europe: Questions of areal-typological profiling. – Journal of Language Contact 6.1: 134–159.

Danylenko A. 2015. On the mechanisms of the grammaticalization of comitative and instru­mental categories in Slavic. – Journal of Historical Linguistics 5.2: 267–296.

Danylenko A. 2016. Oleksandr Popov (1855–80) and the reconstruction of Indo-European noun inflection. – Language and History 59.2: 112–130.

Danylenko A. 2018. The correlation of linguistic patterning and societal structures in sys­temic typology. – Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 135: 81–96.

DeGraff M. 2001. On the origin of creoles: A Cartesian critique of Neo-Darwinian linguis­tics. – Linguistic Typology 5.2/3: 213–310.

Dixon R.M.W. 1979. Ergativity. – Language 55.1: 59–138.

Drinka B. 2017. Language contact in Europe. The periphrastic perfect through history. Cambridge.

Du Bois J.W. 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. – Language 63.4: 805–855.

Fleischman S. 1983. From pragmatics to grammar. – Lingua 60.2/3: 183–214.

Fraenkel E. 1929. Syntax der litauischen Postpositionen und Präpositionen. Heidelberg.

Haspelmath M., Michaelis S.M. 2017. Analytic and synthetic: Typological change in varieties of European languages. – Buchstaller I., Siebenhaar B. (eds.). Language variation – Euro­pean perspectives VI. [Selected papers from the 8th International Conference on Language Variation in Europe, Leipzig 2015]. Amsterdam: 1–17.

Heine B., Kuteva T. 2005. Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge.

Hetzer A. 2010. Das südosteuopäische Areal. – Hinrichs U. (ed.). Handbuch der Eurolin­guistik. Wiesbaden: 457–473.

Janse M. 2009. Greek-Turkish language contact in Asia Minor. – Études helléniques / Hel­lenic Studies 17: 37–54.

Jašinskaitė I. 1957. Kirtis, priegaidė ir jų poveikis vokalizmui Biržų tarmėje. – Lietuvių kalbotyros klausimai 1: 189–195.

Joseph B.D. 2010. Language contact in the Balkans. – Hickey R. (ed.). The handbook of lan­guage contact. Malden (MA): 618–633.

Klimov G. 1979. On the position of the ergative type in typological classification. – Plank F. (ed.). Ergativity. Toward a theory of grammatical relations. London: 327–332.

Kulikov L. 2009. Evolution of case systems. – Malchukov A., Spencer A. (eds.). Case. Oxford: 439–457.

Logar T. 1958. O izgubi nominalnih končnic v nekaterih slovenskih primorskih govorih. – Slavistična revija 1.11: 109–112.

Lutin S.A. 1990. Sistemno-tipologičeskij analiz rezul’tativnyx konstrukcij russkix govorov Severa i Severo-Zapada. [Candidate of Science Dissertation; Peoples’ Friendship Uni­versity, Moscow].

McWhorter J.H. 2008. Why does a language undress? – Miestamo M., Sinnemäki K., Karls­son F. (eds.). Language complexity. Typology, contact, change. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: 167–190.

Mel’nikov G.P. 1969. Jazykovaja stratifikacija i klassifikacija jazykov. – Edinicy raznyx urovnej jazyka i ix vzaimodejstvie. Moscow: 45–73.

Mel’nikov G.P. 1971. Determinanta – veduščaja grammatičeskaja tendencija jazyka. – Fone­tika, fonologija, grammatika. [K semidesjatiletiju A.A. Reformatskogo]. Moscow: 359–367.

Mel’nikov G.P. 1973. Sistemnyj podxod v lingvistike. – Sistemnye issledovanija 1972. Mos­cow: 183–204.

Mel’nikov G.P. 1980. Priroda padežnyx značenij i klassifikacija padežej. – Issledovanija v oblasti grammatiki i tipologii jazykov. – Moscow: 39–64.

Mel’nikov G.P. 1986. Sistemnaja lingvistika Gumbol’dta–Sreznevskogo–Potebni–Boduèna i sovremennaja sistemnaja tipologija jazykov. – Problemy tipologičeskoj, funkcional’noj i opisatel’noj lingvistiki. Moscow: 13–26.

Mel’nikov G.P. 1988. Kommunikativnyj rakurs – osnova semantičeskogo i grammatičeskogo svoeobrazija jazyka kak izobrazitel’noj znakovoj sistemy. – Metodologija lingvistiki i aspekty izučenija jazyka. Moscow: 13–26.

Mel’nikov G.P. 2003. Sistemnaja tipologija jazykov. Moscow.

Miestamo M. 2008. Grammatical complexity in a cross-linguistic perspective. – Miestamo M., Sinnemäki K., Karlsson F. (eds.). Language complexity. Typology, contact, change. Am­sterdam, Philadelphia: 23–41.

Miestamo M. 2009. Implicational hierarchism and grammatical complexity. – Sampson G., Gil D., Trudgill P. (eds.). Language complexity as an evolving variable. Oxford: 80–97.

Mithun M. 1999. The languages of native North America. Cambridge.

Nepokupnyj A.P. 1964. Areal’nye aspekty balto-slavjanskix otnošenij. Kyiv.

Orr R.A. 1989. Russo-Goidelic syntactic parallel: u nego svoja izba postavlena / tá sé déanta agam. – General Linguistics 29.1: 1–21.

Orr R.A. 1999. Evolutionary biology and historical linguistics. – Diachronica 16.1: 123–157.

Popov A.V. 1881. Sintaksičeskija izslědovanija. I. Imenitel’nyj, zvatel’nyj i vinitel’nyj vъsv­jazi sъistorijej razvitija založnyxъznačenij i bezličnyxъoborotovъvъsanskritě, zendě, grečeskomъ, latinskomъ, německomъ, litovskomъ, latyšskomъ, i slavjanskomъnarěčijaxъ. Voronež.

Potebnja A.A. 1941. Iz zapisok po russkoj grammatike. [vol. 4: Glagol. Mestoimenie. Čislitel’noe. Predlog]. Moscow, Leningrad.

Požarickaja S.K. 2004. Bespredložnyj tvoritel’nyj padež v severnorusskix govorax na obščeslavjanskom fone (semantika i sintaksis). – Issledovanija po slavjanskoj dialektologii 9: Metody izučenija territorial’nyx i social’nyx dialektov. K itogam opyta slavjanskoj diale­ktologii XX v. Moscow: 131–158.

Revithiadu A., Ostendorp M. von, Kalomoira N., Tiliopoulou M.–A. 2006. Vowel harmony in contact-induced systems: The case of Asia Minor dialects of Greek. – Janse M., Joseph B., Rally A. (eds.). Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory. Patras: 350–365.

Sakhno S. 2011. Pourquoi deux génitifs et deux locatifs en russe pour certains substantifs? État actuel des paradigmes et aspects diachroniques. – Fruyt M., Mazoyer M., Pardee D. (eds.). Grammatical case in the languages of the Middle East and Europe. Chicago: 359–371.

Schleicher A. 1873 [1863]. Die Darwinische Theorie und die Sprachwissenschaft. Weimar.

Schwegler A. 1990. Analyticity and syntheticity. A diachronic retrospective with special refer­ence to Romance languages. Berlin, New York.

Shevelov G.Y. 1965. A prehistory of Slavic. New York.

Sobolev A.N. 2009. From synthetic to analytic case. Variation in South Slavic dialects. – Malchukov A., Spencer A. (eds.). Case. Oxford: 716–729.

Steenwijk H. 1992. The Slovene dialect of Resia San Giorgio. Amsterdam, Atlanta.

Tchekhoff C. 1978. Aux fondements de la syntaxe: l’ergatif. Paris.

Trudgill P. 1996. Dialect typology: Isolation, social network and phonological structure. – Guy G.R., Feagin C., Schiffrin D., Baugh J. (eds.). Towards a social science of language. [vol. 1: Variation and change in language and society]. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: 3–21.

Trudgill P. 1997. Typology and sociolinguistics: Linguistic structure, social structure and explanatory comparative dialectology. – Folia Linguistica 31.3/4: 349–360.

Trudgill P. 2010. Contact and sociolinguistic typology. – Hickey R. (ed.). The handbook of language contact. Malden (MA): 299–319.

Trudgill P. 2011. Sociolinguistic typology. Oxford.