Serbia’s Policy towards Kosovo after 2000. A Typology of Explanations
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTESerbia’s Policy towards Kosovo after 2000. A Typology of Explanations
Publication date: 22.03.2018
Central European and Balkan Studies, 2017, Tom XXVI, pp. 123 - 134
https://doi.org/10.4467/2543733XSSB.17.028.8326Authors
Serbia’s Policy towards Kosovo after 2000. A Typology of Explanations
Serbia’s stubborness to recognize Kosovo independence and a continuous effort to bring Kosovo back under its state jurisdiction seems to be in political terms irrational. However, this has been a continuous strategy of all Serbian governments since Milosevićs’ fall in 2000. The aim of the paper is to try to give explanations to this, at first sight, paradoxical phenomenon. Is there any rationality in this irrationality? Author finds Craig Parsons’s typology of explanations very useful in understanding the phenomenon of Serbia’s politics toward Kosovo after 2000.
Babić Marko, Defining Political Extremism in the Balkans. The case of Serbia, International Studies, Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal, Vol.17, No.1/2015, De Gruyter Open
Durkheim Emil, The Division of Labor in Society, The Free Press, New York 1993
Evans Martin, Algeria, France’s Undeclared War, Oxford University Press 2012
Foucault Michel, Technologies of the Self, edited by Martin H. Luther, Huck Gutman and Patrick Hutton, University of Massachusets Press, 1988
Gagnon V.P., The Myth of Ethnic War: Serbia and Croatia in the 1990s, Cornell University Press, Ithaca 2004
Lyotard Jean-Francois, Postmodernizm dla dzieci, Altheia Warszawa 1998
Mirscheimer John, Anarchy and the Struggle for power, [in:] The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York and London, W.W. Norton Company 2001
Panev Goran, Population ageing trends in Serbia from the beginning of the 21st century and Prospects until 2061: Regional Aspect, Зборник Матице Српске за друштвене науке, No. 148 (Vol. 3/2014), Београд 2014
Parsons Craig, How to Map Arguments in Political Science, Oxford University Press 2007
Smith Anthony, Sacred Territories and National Conflict, Israel Affairs, Vol. 5, No. 4, 1999
Spruyt Hendrik, Ending Empire: Contested Sovereignty and Territorial Partition, Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London 2005
Waever Ole, The Changing Agenda of Societal Security, [in:] Brauch, Hans Gunter et al., (eds.), Globalization and Envirnomental Challenges, Reconceptualization Security in the 21st Century, Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg 2008
Waltz Kenneth, Theory of International Politics, Addison-Wesley Publishing, 1979
Waltz Kenneth, Man, the State and War, A Theoretical Analysis, Columbia University Press, New York 2001
Wendt Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1999
White George, Nationalism and Territory: Constructing Group Identity in South-East Europe, Rowman and Littlefield, Oxford 2000
Information: Central European and Balkan Studies, 2017, Tom XXVI, pp. 123 - 134
Article type: Original article
Titles:
Serbia’s Policy towards Kosovo after 2000. A Typology of Explanations
Serbia’s Policy towards Kosovo after 2000. A Typology of Explanations
Institute of European Studies University of Warsaw
Published at: 22.03.2018
Article status: Open
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
EnglishView count: 1616
Number of downloads: 1039