FAQ

Values Beyond Ownership: Rethinking Cultural and Civilian Uses of Heritage within International Humanitarian Law

Publication date: 18.12.2024

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2024, 2/2024 (10), pp. 51 - 76

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.24.012.20823

Authors

Diogo Machado
University of New South Wales
Sydney NSW 2052 Australia, Australia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8146-0193 Orcid
Contact with author
All publications →

Titles

Values Beyond Ownership: Rethinking Cultural and Civilian Uses of Heritage within International Humanitarian Law

Abstract

Scholarship on international humanitarian law rethinks the current premise within international cultural heritage law that heritage should be protected in wartime based on its great importance to humankind only. The property value of heritage to civilians reveals extrinsic justifications for protecting heritage. The widespread acceptance of international humanitarian law instruments, coupled with the customary nature of some rules related to cultural heritage, can be conducive to heritage safeguarding during armed conflicts. However, this ownership-centred protection may fall short of adequately safeguarding cultural objects that hold significance beyond their property value, particularly artefacts that constitute a part of humanity’s shared global heritage. Additionally, an approach primarily focused on property values may exacerbate inequities within the cultural heritage domain by favouring affluent collectors and resource-rich nations more capable of asserting ownership claims. In this sense, overemphasizing ownership rights can result in fragmentation, where cultural items are dispersed among private collectors rather than being curated to contribute to the communal narratives surrounding the conflict in which they were pillaged or misappropriated. In broadening the international legal framework that serves the protection of cultural heritage in armed conflicts, the integration of international humanitarian law and heritage law should result in legal responses for the management of cultural heritage in wartime that account for both the civilian-use and cultural value of heritage.

References

Download references

Blake J., International Cultural Heritage Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015.

Blake J., Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Event of Armed Conflict: An Imperative for Cultural Heritage, Humanitarian and Human Rights Law, “Europa Ethnica” 2017, Vol. 74(3-4).

Blue Shield, Who We Arehttps://theblueshield.org/about-us/who-we-are/ [accessed: 25.01.2024].

Bokova I., Culture on the Front Line of New Wars, “The Brown Journal of World Affairs” 2015, Vol. 22(1).

Bories C., White Paper 19: Cultural Heritage, Paris 2023, https://www.ilaparis2023.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/patrimoine-culturel-EN.pdf [accessed: 12.02.2024].

Bortolotto C., Skounti A. (eds.), Intangible Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Development: Inside a UNESCO Convention, Routledge, London 2023.

Buffard I., Zemanek K., The ‘Object and Purpose’ of a Treaty: An Enigma? “Austrian Review of International & European Law” 1998, Vol. 3.

Chechi A., Rescuing Cultural Heritage from War and Terrorism: A View from Switzerland, “Santander Art and Culture Law Review” 2015, Vol. 2(1).

Cobbing F., Hulin L., Guest Editorial: Gaza’s Cultural Heritage and Intellectual Life, “Palestine Exploration Quarterly” 2024, Vol. 156(1).

Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict with Regulations for the Execution of the Convention, 14 May 1954, 249 UNTS 240.

Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, 17 October 2003, 2368 UNTS 3.

Crawford E., Pert A., International Humanitarian Law, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2020.

Djeffal C., How Post-Positivism Sheds Light on Treaty Interpretation: Celebrating the VCLT Rule of Interpretation, in: L. Siliquini-Cinelli (ed.), Legal Positivism in a Global and Transnational Age, Springer, Cham 2019.

Draft International Regulations on the Laws and Customs of War, 27 August 1874.

Fleck D., Historical Development and Legal Basis, in: D. Fleck (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2021.

Forrest C., International Law and the Protection of Cultural Heritage, Routledge, London–New York 2010.

Francioni F., Public and Private in the International Protection of Global Cultural Goods, “European Journal of International Law” 2012, Vol. 23(3).

Fredheim L.H., Khalaf M., The Significance of Values: Heritage Value Typologies Re-Examined, “International Journal of Heritage Studies” 2016, Vol. 22(6).

Frowe H., Matravers D., Conflict and Cultural Heritage: A Moral Analysis of the Challenges of Heritage Protection, Getty Publications, Los Angeles 2019.

Frulli M., The Criminalization of Offences against Cultural Heritage in Times of Armed Conflict: The Quest for Consistency, “European Journal of International Law” 2011, Vol. 22(1).

Geneva Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, 12 August 1949, 75 UNTS 287.

Hampson F., Belligerent Reprisals and the 1977 Protocols to the Geneva Conventions of 1949, “International and Comparative Law Quarterly” 1988, Vol. 37(4).

Henckaerts J.-M., Doswald-Beck L., Customary International Humanitarian Law, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2009.

Higgins N., The Protection of Cultural Heritage during Armed Conflict: The Changing Paradigms, Routledge, London 2020.

Instructions for the Government of Armies of the United States in the Field (Lieber Code), 24 April 1863.

International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Introduction, “Customary International Humanitarian Law Database”, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/customary-ihl/v1/in [accessed: 10.02.2024].

International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), States Parties to the Geneva Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War 1949https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gciv-1949/state-parties?activeTab=undefined [accessed: 14.05.2024].

International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), States Parties to the Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflictshttps://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/States.xsp?xp_viewStates=XPages_NORMStatesParties&xp_treatySelected=470 [accessed: 14.05.2024].

International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), States Parties to the Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II)https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/States.xsp?xp_viewStates=XPages_NORMStatesParties&xp_treatySelected=475 [accessed: 14.05.2024].

International Law Commission, Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, 18 July 2006, UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.702.

International Law Commission, Tenth Report on Reservations to Treaties by Mr. Alain Pellet, Special Rapporteur, 1 June 2005, UN Doc. A/CN.4/558.

Kila J.D., Iconoclasm and Cultural Heritage Destruction During Contemporary Armed Conflicts, in: S. Hufnagel, D. Chappell (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook on Art Crime, Palgrave Macmillan, London 2019.

Kleffner J., Scope of Application of International Humanitarian Law, in: D. Fleck (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2021.

Laws of War on Land, 9 September 1880.

Linderfalk U., On the Meaning of the ‘Object and Purpose’ Criterion, in the Context of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Article 19, “Nordic Journal of International Law” 2003, Vol. 72(4).

Lixinski L., Between Orthodoxy and Heterodoxy: The Troubled Relationships between Heritage Studies and Heritage Law, “International Journal of Heritage Studies” 2015, Vol. 21(3).

Lixinski L., International Heritage Law for Communities: Exclusion and Re-Imagination, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2019.

Lixinski L., Legalized Identities: Cultural Heritage Law and the Shaping of Transitional Justice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2021.

Lostal M., International Cultural Heritage Law in Armed Conflict: Case-Studies of Syria, Libya, Mali, the Invasion of Iraq, and the Buddhas of Bamiyan, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2017.

Matz-Lück N., Norm Interpretation across International Regimes: Competences and Legitimacy, in: M.A. Young (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2012.

McCafferty J.D., UNESCO, Cultural Heritage and Conflict in Yemen, Syria and Iraq, Springer, Cham 2023.

Merryman J.H., Cultural Property Internationalism, “International Journal of Cultural Property” 2005, Vol. 12(1).

O’Keefe R., Cultural Heritage and International Humanitarian Law, in: F. Francioni, A.F. Vrdoljak (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Cultural Heritage Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2020.

O’Keefe R., Protection of Cultural Property under International Criminal Law, “Melbourne Journal of International Law” 2010, Vol. 11.

O’Keefe R., Protection of Cultural Property, in: D. Fleck (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2021.

O’Keefe R., The Meaning of ‘Cultural Property’ under the 1954 Hague Convention, “Netherlands International Law Review” 1999, Vol. 46(1).

O’Keefe R., The Protection of Cultural Property in Armed Conflict, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2006.

Pineshi L. (ed.), Cultural Heritage, Sustainable Development and Human Rights: Towards an Integrated Approach, Routledge, London 2024.

Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977, 1125 UNTS 3.

Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977, 1125 UNTS 609.

Protocol to the Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, 14 May 1954, 249 UNTS 358.

Rush L., Blue Shield Protection of Cultural Property: A Perspective from the Field, in: S. Hufnagel, D. Chappell (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook on Art Crime, Palgrave Macmillan, London 2019.

Second Protocol to the Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, 26 March 1999, 2253 UNTS 172.

Slim H., Choosing between Human Life and Cultural Heritage in War, in: J.B. Cuno, T.G. Weiss (eds.), Cultural Heritage and Mass Atrocities, Getty Publications, Los Angeles 2022.

Toman J., Cultural Property in War: Improvement in Protection. Commentary on the 1999 Second Protocol to the Hague Convention of 1954 for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, UNESCO Publishing, Paris 2009.

Toman J., The Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict: Commentary on the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict and Its Protocol, Signed on 14 May, 1954 in the Hague, and on Other Instruments of International Law, Routledge, London–New York 1996.

Toman J., Schindler D. (eds.), The Laws of Armed Conflicts: A Collection of Conventions, Resolutions and Other Documents, Nijhoff, Leiden 2004.

UN General Assembly, Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (Rio de Janeiro, 3-14 June 1992), 12 August 1992, UN Doc. A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. I).

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), States Parties to the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict with Regulations for the Execution of the Convention 1954https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/convention-protection-cultural-property-event-armed-conflict-regulations-execution-convention#item-4 [accessed: 14.05.2024].

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), States Parties to the Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict 1954https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/protocol-convention-protection-cultural-property-event-armed-conflict#item-4 [accessed: 14.05.2024].

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), States Parties to the Second Protocol to the Hague Convention of 1954 for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict 1999https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/second-protocol-hague-convention-1954-protection-cultural-property-event-armed-conflict#item-4 [accessed: 14.05.2024].

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 23 May 1969, 1155 UNTS 331.

Young M., Saving the Artwork of Ukraine, “The Wilson Quarterly” 2022, https://www.wilsonquarterly.com/quarterly/ripples-of-war/saving-the-artwork-of-ukraine [accessed: 24.06.2024].

Information

Information: Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2024, 2/2024 (10), pp. 51 - 76

Article type: Original article

Titles:

English: Values Beyond Ownership: Rethinking Cultural and Civilian Uses of Heritage within International Humanitarian Law

Authors

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8146-0193

Diogo Machado
University of New South Wales
Sydney NSW 2052 Australia, Australia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8146-0193 Orcid
Contact with author
All publications →

University of New South Wales
Sydney NSW 2052 Australia, Australia

Published at: 18.12.2024

Article status: Open

Licence: CC BY  licence icon

Percentage share of authors:

Diogo Machado (Author) - 100%

Information about author:

Dr Diogo Machado holds a PhD in International Law from the University of New South Wales (UNSW), where he is a sessional lecturer. His research interests encompass public international law, transnational crimes, cultural heritage, international cooperation, and criminology. He holds an MSc in Criminology (University of Glasgow) and an LLB (University of Brasília). Prior to joining UNSW, Diogo worked as an international lawyer, negotiating international treaties and participating in meetings held by organizations such as the United Nations, G20, OECD, Interpol, FATF, the European Judicial Network, the Organization of American States, Mercosur, and the International Association of Anti-corruption Authorities.

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

English