“Einstein’s Dentist” (Hans Sachs) and Restitution Claims Concerning a Nazi-Looted Poster Collection
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEPublication date: 18.12.2024
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2024, 2/2024 (10), pp. 283 - 294
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.24.022.20833Authors
“Einstein’s Dentist” (Hans Sachs) and Restitution Claims Concerning a Nazi-Looted Poster Collection
This article delves into the ongoing issues surrounding the restitution of artwork stolen by the Nazi regime during the Second World War. It highlights the less-explored case of German dentist Hans Sachs and his extensive poster collection, shedding light on the challenges faced by heirs of Nazi-looted art and revealing the stance of German cultural institutions and courts. It traces the history of Sachs’ collection, its significance in cultural heritage, and the subsequent attempts to recover it. The focus then shifts to Peter Sachs, the collector’s son, and his pursuit of justice through legal means, detailing the various court decisions that marked the progress of the case. Through this comprehensive analysis the article provides insights into the broader issues of art restitution, the complexities of legal battles involving Nazi-looted art, and the implications for cultural heritage preservation. It concludes with a summary of the key findings and the implications of the Hans Sachs case.
Aynsley J., Graphic Design in Germany, 1890-1945, University of California Press, Los Angeles 2000.
Beratende Kommission, Accord between the Federation, the Federal States and the National Associations of Local Authorities on the Establishment of an Advisory Commission of 2003, New edition 2016, https://www.beratende-kommission.de/en/commission [accessed: 20.04.2024].
Beratende Kommission, Recommendation of the Advisory Commission in the Case of the Heirs of Hans Sachs v. Deutsches Historisches Museum, 25 January 2007, https://www.beratende-kommission.de/en/recommendations [accessed: 23.12.2023].
Beratende Kommission im Zusammenhang mit der Rückgabe NS-verfolgungsbedingt entzogenen Kulturguts, insbesondere aus jüdischem Besitz für das 20. Kulturpolitische Spitzengespräch am 13. März 2024, https://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/pdf/PresseUndAktuelles/2024/2024_03_13_20_KuPoSpG_BeratendeKommission_Beschlussvorschlag.pdf [accessed: 23.04.2024].
Bergmann A., Der Verfall des Eigentums Ersitzung und Verjährung der Vindikation am Beispiel von Raubkunst und Entarteter Kunst (Der Fall Gurlitt), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2015.
Bundesgerichtshof, Peter Sachs v. Stiftung Deutsches Historisches Museum, Judgment of 16 March 2012, V ZR 279/10.
Campfens E., Nazi Looted Art: A Note in Favour of Clear Standards and Neutral Procedures, “Art Antiquity and Law” 2017, Vol. 22(4).
Campfens E., Restitution of Looted Art: What About Access to Justice? “Santander Art and Culture Law Review” 2018, Vol. 2(4).
Catalogue of Important Old Master and Modern Paintings. Comprising the Property of Lady Keppel and Other Owners Also. The Property of the Estate of Jakob Goldschmidt, Sotheby & Co., auction catalogue, sale date: 28 November 1956.
Chapman K., The Most Dedicated Collector of Posters in Germany, in: R.E. Iskin, B. Salsbury (eds.), Collecting Prints, Posters and Ephemera, Bloomsbury, New York 2021.
Chappell D., Hufnagel S., The Gurlitt Case: German and International Responses to Ownership Rights in Looting Cases, in: J.D. Kila, M. Balcells (eds.), Cultural Property Crime. An Overview and Analysis of Contemporary Perspectives and Trends, Brill, Boston–Leiden 2014.
German Lost Art Foundation, Nazi-Looted Cultural Property: Basics & Overview, https://kulturgutverluste.de/en/contexts/nazi-looted-cultural-property#commission [accessed: 20.04.2024].
Glass S., Einstein’s Dentist, Goebbels and Me, “The Times”, 28 January 2010, https://www.lootedart.com/news.php?r=O2PP47251221 [accessed: 20.04.2024].
Kammergericht, Peter Sachs v. Stiftung Deutsches Historisches Museum, Judgment of 28 January 2010, 8 U 56/09.
Kammergericht – 8 U 56/09 – Urteil vom 28. Januar 2010, “Bundesgerichtshof. Mitteilung der Pressestelle” 22/2012, https://juris.bundesgerichtshof.de/cgi-bin/rechtsprechung/document.py?Gericht=bgh&Art=en&Datum=Aktuell&Sort=12288&anz=639&pos=3&nr=59151&linked=pm&Blank=1 [accessed: 21.12.2023].
Kennedy Grimsted P., A Goudstikker van Goyen in Gdańsk: A Case Study of Nazi-Looted Art in Poland, “International Journal of Cultural Property” 2020, Vol. 27(1), pp. 53-96.
Kohlenberg K., In the Name of My Father, “Die Zeit”, 15 January 2015.
Landgericht Berlin, Peter Sachs v. Stiftung Deutsches Historisches Museum, Judgment of 10 February 2009, 19 O 116/08.
Mehr Fortschritt wagen. Bündnis für Freiheit, Gerechtigkeit und Nachhaltigkeit. Koalitionsvertrag 2021-2025 zwischen der SPD, BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN und FDP, https://cms.gruene.de/uploads/assets/Koalitionsvertrag_2021_barrierearm.pdf [accessed: 22.04.2024].
Restitutions Committee, Recommendation regarding the Application by Amsterdamse Negotiatie Compagnie NV in Liquidation for the Restitution of 267 Works of Art from the Dutch National Art Collection, https://www.restitutiecommissie.nl/en/recommendation/goudstikker/ [accessed: 20.04.2024].
Roodt C., Private International Law, Art and Cultural Heritage, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham–Northampton 2015.
Sachs H., The World’s Largest Poster Collection, 1896-1938: How It Came about and… Disappeared from the Face of the Earth, self-published, New York 1957.
Supreme Court (United States), Republic of Austria v. Altmann, Judgment of 7 June 2004, 541 U.S. 677, 124 S. Ct. 2240; 159 L. Ed. 2d 1; 2004 U.S. LEXIS 4030.
The Hans Sachs Poster Collection, parts I and II, New York 2013. Verwaltungsgericht Magdeburg, Judgment of 31 March 2015, 6 A 81/15.
von Klitzing I., Thielecke C., National Perspectives: Germany, in: R. Redmond-Cooper (ed.), Museums and the Holocaust, Institute of Art and Law, Builth Wells 2021.
Weller M., Die Plakatsammlung Hans Sachs – Zur Ausschlusswirkung des alliierten Rückerstattungsrechts heute, in: Diebstahl – Raub – Beute: Von der antiken Statue zur digitalen Kopie, VI. Heidelberger Kunstrechtstag am 28. und 29. September 2012, “Schriften zum Kunstund Kulturrecht”, Nomos-Verlag, Baden-Baden 2013.
Weller M., German ‘Advisory Commission’ to be Replaced by an Arbitration Framework, 20 March 2024, https://ial.uk.com/german-advisory-commission/ [accessed: 22.04.2024].
Weller M., Kein Ausschluss des allgemein-zivilrechtlichen Anspruchs auf Herausgabe nach § 985 BGB durch das Rückerstattungsrecht, “Kunstrechtssprechung” 2009, Vol. 1.
Wonfor Z., How to Weigh a Poster: The Restitution of the Hans Sachs Poster Collection, “Cujah” 2017, Vol. 11.
Zum Verhältnis von Bundesrückerstattungsgesetz, Vermögensgesetz und zivilrechtlichen Ansprüchen, “Kunst und Recht” 2009, Vol. 2.
Information: Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2024, 2/2024 (10), pp. 283 - 294
Article type: Original article
Titles:
Magdalena Abakanowicz University of the Arts Poznań
Poland
Published at: 18.12.2024
Article status: Open
Licence: CC BY
Percentage share of authors:
Information about author:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
EnglishView count: 46
Number of downloads: 24