The unjust enrichment in the Polish Code of Obligations of 1933 as compared with the regulation of this institution in other codes of the time
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEPublication date: 04.02.2013
Cracow Studies of Constitutional and Legal History, Volume 5 (2012), Volume 5, Issue 4, pp. 307 - 328
https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.12.024.0925Authors
Instytucja niesłusznego zbogacenia w polskim Kodeksie zobowiązań z 1933 r. na tle współczesnych kodyfikacji
The paper discusses the unjust enrichmennt as found in the Polish Code of Obligations of 1933. The discussion is conducted in a comparative way and makes allusions to other regulations of the time (those detectable in the ABGB, Code Civil, BGB, Obligationenrecht). It also makes reference to the solution accepted in the Polish Civil Code of 1964. What was discussed was the very construction of unjust enrichment as found in the aforementioned regulations (1), grounds for the claims (2), the scope within which the duty to return the enrichment applied (3), the nature of the claim – whether it was autonomous or subsidiary (4). In his final remarks, the author tried to assess the discussed institution as regulated in the Code of Obligations (5).
Information: Cracow Studies of Constitutional and Legal History, Volume 5 (2012), Volume 5, Issue 4, pp. 307 - 328
Article type: Original article
Titles:
Jagiellonian University in Kraków
Published at: 04.02.2013
Article status: Open
Licence: None
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
PolishView count: 2470
Number of downloads: 1838