FAQ

Issue 2 (2018)

Modern Russian-Ukrainian Relations: a View from Russia

Volume 8 (2018) Next

Publication date: 31.05.2018

Licence: CC BY-NC-ND  licence icon

Editorial team

Editor-in-Chief Tomasz Michalski

Guest editors Alexander Druzhinin, Vladimir Kolosov

Issue content

Alexander Druzhinin, Vladimir Kolosov

Journal of Geography, Politics and Society, Issue 2 (2018), Volume 8 (2018), pp. 5 - 6

https://doi.org/10.4467/24512249JG.18.009.8215
Read more Next

Vladimir Kolosov

Journal of Geography, Politics and Society, Issue 2 (2018), Volume 8 (2018), pp. 7 - 15

https://doi.org/10.4467/24512249JG.18.010.8216

The break-up between Russia and Ukraine was rather painful for both sides Though it was not unavoidable, it was prepared by the developments in both countries since the disintegration of the Soviet Union and to a certain extent resulted from the very model of state-building adopted by Ukrainian political elite and based on the opposition of Ukraine to Russia seen as the way to the emancipation from the burden of the imperial/Soviet past. It involved, in particular, a radical revision of Ukrainian territory’s symbolic perception, provoked, on its turn, by the Russian-Ukrainian “battles of memory” initiated well before the crisis of 2014. Recent events deeply transformed public opinion in Ukraine and identity of Ukrainians. The author describes some consequences of the break up between two countries for ordinary citizens, especially living in border regions. He briefly considers the adaptation of economy and population to the new conditions of neighbourhood.

Read more Next

Alexander Druzhinin

Journal of Geography, Politics and Society, Issue 2 (2018), Volume 8 (2018), pp. 16 - 25

https://doi.org/10.4467/24512249JG.18.011.8217

The article analyzes the evolution trend of economic ties between Russia and Ukraine over the past quarter century. It is shown that bilateral Russian-Ukrainian relations are experiencing degradation and disaggregation, lose their “exclusivity” due to diminishing “USSR inertia”, globalization and the influence of leading “power centers”. The new round of geopolitical and geo-economic “redistribution” of the Eurasian space (initiated by the increasing influence of China and the overall “flow” of the economic and demographic potential to the South-East of Eurasia) became the significant challenge for economic cooperation between Russia and Ukraine. The crisis in Russian-Ukrainian relations, unfolding in this context, significantly limits the development opportunities for the both countries, leads to the increase of peripheral traits in their economies, and multiplies dependence on global economic and political actors.

Read more Next

Sergey Sushchiy

Journal of Geography, Politics and Society, Issue 2 (2018), Volume 8 (2018), pp. 26 - 32

https://doi.org/10.4467/24512249JG.18.012.8218

The article studies quantitative and spatial dynamics of the Russian speaking population of the post soviet Ukraine. The factors accelerating the demographic shrinkage of the Russians of the country by 3 million people during 1989–2001 are analyzed. On the basis of a comparative analysis of the results of the 2001 Ukrainian census and the data of the ethnic and linguistic surveys of the Ukrainian population the conclusion is drawn that the core role in a prompt reduction of the number of the Russians belong to the assimilation. The analysis of the dynamic trends of the last several years allows affirming that within the borders of the modern Ukraine without the Crimea and the Donbas which is politically independent from Kyiv there may live about 4.1–4.5 million Russians. The study of eventual middle term prospects prove that by 2030 the given  number may reduce to 3.3–3.7 million people. The important role in this process will play all three factors of the number dynamics: natural decline, outward migration flow, assimilation. But the core role in the demographic shrinkage of the Russian community belongs to the assimilation or the transition from the Russian to the Ukrainian self identity of a part of the biological and ethnic community of Ukraine. However the number of the Russians in the country recorded by all ensuing censuses of the population was lower than the real ethnic and cultural presence of the “Russian world” in Ukraine as the above mentioned identity transfer was not accompanied by an acculturation. The Russian language and culture not only dominate in the Russian environment but also keep a weighty role within the dominant country group. Only by prolongation of several decades of tough of a severe anti Russian course Ukraine is capable of undermining the social and cultural potential of the Russian world.

Read more Next

Anton Serikov, Andrey Bedrik

Journal of Geography, Politics and Society, Issue 2 (2018), Volume 8 (2018), pp. 33 - 43

https://doi.org/10.4467/24512249JG.18.013.8219

The article describes the current stage of the development of Russian-Ukrainian relations. The authors describe the public opinion of the youth of the Rostov region bordering with Ukraine. Thus the scenario for the development of these relations depends on the image of Ukraine formed in the minds of young Russians. The article suggests a new methodological concept “transconflict region”. The authors use this concept to analyze the influence of the events occurring on the territory of Ukraine on the border regions of Russia (the example of the Rostov region).

Read more Next

Alexandra Shvets, Igor Voronin

Journal of Geography, Politics and Society, Issue 2 (2018), Volume 8 (2018), pp. 44 - 53

https://doi.org/10.4467/24512249JG.18.014.8220
The article analyzes spatial indicators of changing trends in political and geographical subjectivity of Crimea. Linguistic and religious contradictions outlined Crimea among other regions of Ukraine. Limitation of linguistic diversity in Crimea, disregard towards complex contradictions between split Orthodox Christianity and politicized Islam made Crimea create background for separation from Ukrainian project of framing Russophobic state on the territory of modern Ukraine.
Read more Next

Sergey Sushchiy, Taras Medvedkin

Journal of Geography, Politics and Society, Issue 2 (2018), Volume 8 (2018), pp. 54 - 65

https://doi.org/10.4467/24512249JG.18.015.8221
This article examines the political, ethno-demographic and socio-economic aspects of the self-proclaimed republics of Eastern Donbass. It is concluded that the most likely scenario is to preserve them as politically independent from Kiev, the pro- Russian societies with an uncertain international political status.
The process of state bodies’ system formation in Eastern Donbass (Donetsk and Lugansk people’s Republic – D(L)PR), further legitimizing of the vertical power of the republics through activation of local party life and finalizing the system of elections for leaders and deputy corps of various levels are expected to be completed in the coming years.
The socio-political fate of Donbass will also largely determine the further ethnic evolution of its population, both in the western (Ukrainian) and the eastern (“republican”) parts. The consolidation of the republics as stable political and administrative and territorial entities in the medium term (by 2025-2030) may lead to a quantitative predominance of the Russian population within their borders (taking into account bi-ethnophors with Russian ethnic self-identification).
At present the only realistic scenario of socio-economic development of the republics remains their progressive “shadow” integration into the life cycles of the Russian economy. In the next few years a serious spatial transformation of the entire infrastructure complex of the D(L)PR, including a network of transport communications and the basic systems of social life support, is expected. The transformation is caused by a radical turn of trade and economic ties of the region to Russia and the need to move the central infrastructural hubs of the republics away from the front line.
Read more Next