The Future of the Digital Permanent Establishment Concept: Challenges and Obstacles
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEPublication date: 07.11.2024
Financial Law Review, 2024, Issue 34 (2)/2024,
https://doi.org/10.4467/22996834FLR.24.009.20614Authors
The Future of the Digital Permanent Establishment Concept: Challenges and Obstacles
Addressing the challenges and implications of taxing the digital economy through the concept of Digital Permanent Establishment [DPE] is the main focus of this article.
Traditional tax systems based on physical presence are inadequate for digital businesses that generate significant revenues without a physical footprint. The research examines whether the introduction of DPE can increase tax revenues in countries where digital services are provided. The hypothesis is that DPE will lead to higher tax revenues by capturing profits that are currently shifted to low-tax jurisdictions.
The objectives of the article are to analyse the potential effectiveness of DPE in increasing tax revenues, the barriers to increasing tax revenues of DPE, and to compare the economic impact between countries that have adopted DPE and those that have not. The research methodology includes legal analysis, historical analysis and comparative analysis of approaches from chosen countries.
Challenges and other factors affecting the enforceability and profitability of the tax reduce the expected finding that countries that have adopted DPE have seen an increase in tax revenues from digital services.
This does not mean that DPE is effective in combating base erosion and profit shifting [BEPS] in the digital economy. However, the study also highlights administrative challenges and the need for international coordination to avoid double taxation.
In conclusion, the article’s findings confirm that DPE can increase tax revenues and contribute to fairer taxation of the digital economy. It provides new insights into the implementation and impact of DPE and highlights its potential to modernise international tax systems. The findings underline the importance of adapting tax policies to the realities of the digital economy.
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE [EU] 2016/1164: Laying down rules against tax avoidance practices that directly affect the functioning of the internal market [2016]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32016L1164.
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE [EU] 2021/514: Amending Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation [2021]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32021L0514.
League of Nations. [1933]. Double Taxation and Fiscal Evasion: Report and Resolutions Submitted by the Technical Experts to the Financial Committee of the League of Nations. Geneva: League of Nations.
OECD. [2000]. Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital: Condensed Version 2000. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/mtc_cond-2000-en.
Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: On the common system of a digital services tax on revenues resulting from the provision of certain digital services [2018]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52018PC0148.
Regulation [EU] 2016/679: General Data Protection Regulation. https://gdpr-info.eu
UK Government. Income Tax Act 2007 [2007]. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/3/contents.
United Nations. [2017]. UN Model Double Taxation Convention between Developed and Developing Countries. from https://www.un.org/esa/ffd/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/MDT_2017.pdf.
Adu, S. Taxation in the digital economy – How much will things change? Retrieved June 10, 2024, from https://www.pwc.com/ng/en/assets/pdf/tax-watch-april-2016-tax-in-the-digital-economy.pdf.
Avi-Yonah, R. S. The Structure of International Taxation: A Proposal for Simplification. https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3332&context=articles .
Big-Tech Lobbying: How tech giants lobby and why it is concerning. Retrieved June 10, 2024, from https://www.thegoodlobby.eu/hi-tech-lobbying-howtech-giants-lobby-and-why-it-is-concerning/.
Cockfield, Arthur. [2001]. Transforming the Internet into a Taxable Forum: A Case Study in E-Commerce Taxation. Minnesota Law Review, 29-53.
Department of the Treasury. Publication 901: U.S. Tax Treaties [2016]. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p901.pdf.
Devereux, M. P., & Vella, J. [2014]. Are We Heading towards a Corporate Tax System Fit for the 21st Century? Fiscal Studies, 35[4], 449–475. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24440324.
Honkavirta, V., Perala, T., Ali-Loytty, S., & Piche, R. [2009]. A comparative survey of WLAN location fingerprinting methods. In 2009 6th Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communication [pp. 243-251]. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WPNC.2009.4907834.
Horobin, W. France Pledges to Remove Digital Tax When OECD Deal Implemented. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-06/france-pledges-to-remove-digital-tax-when-oecd-deal-implemented.
KPMG. [2024]. Taxation of the digitalized economy. Retrieved June 10, 2024, from https://kpmg.com/kpmg-us/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2023/digitalized-economy-taxation-developments-summary.pdf.
Li, Z., Zhou, F., Wang, Z., Xu, X., Liu, L., & Yin, G. [2024]. Measuring and classifying IP usage scenarios: a continuous neural trees approach. Scientific Reports, 14[1]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55750-x.
OECD. [2020]. Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalisation – Report on Pillar One Blueprint. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/beba0634-en
OECD: Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digitalisation of the Economy – Policy Note [2019]. https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/policy-note-beps-inclusive-framework-addressing-tax-challenges-digitalisation.pdf
Poese, I., Uhlig, S., Kaafar, M. A., Donnet, B., & Gueye, B. [2011]. IP geolocation databases. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 41[2], 53-56. https://doi.org/10.1145/1971162.1971171
Zandbergen, P. A. [2009]. Accuracy of iPhone Locations: A Comparison of Assisted GPS, WiFi and Cellular Positioning. Transactions in GIS, 13[s1], 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2009.01152.x
Information: Financial Law Review, 2024, Issue 34 (2)/2024,
Article type: Original article
Department of Financial Law and Economics, Faculty of Law, Masaryk University in Brno, Czech Republic
Published at: 07.11.2024
Received at: 24.04.2024
Accepted at: 24.06.2024
Article status: Open
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Percentage share of authors:
Information about author:
Classification number:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
EnglishView count: 36
Number of downloads: 22