New model of tax administration. Change of paradigm
Choose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTENew model of tax administration. Change of paradigm
Publication date: 20.09.2018
Financial Law Review, 2018, Issue 10 (2)/ 2018, pp. 11-29
https://doi.org/10.4467/22996834FLR.18.008.9138Authors
New model of tax administration. Change of paradigm
This contribution deals with a new «partnership» model of tax administration, which is based on mutual trust, dialogue, transparency and cooperation between tax authorities and taxpayers. The main goal of the contribution is to confirm the hypothesis that the most important aims of tax policy in any state are to avoid tax quarrels and to enforce cooperation through constructed interaction between the taxpayers and the tax collectors. The study is based on empirical methods of comparison, description and interpretation, theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic, and specific scientific methods: legal dogmatic method and method of legal norm interpretation.
Ayres I., Braithwaite J. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992. 216 рр.
Baker S., Raskolnikov A. Harmful, Harmless, and Benefi cial Uncertainty in Law // Journal of Legal Studies, Forthcoming (May 14, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2968137.
Burton M. Responsive Regulation and the Uncertainty of Tax Law – Time to Reconsider the Commissioner’s Model of Cooperative Compliance? // eJournal of Tax Research. 2007. Vol. 5, № 1. P. 71–104.
Evans C., Freedman J., Krever R. Preface // Th e Delicate Balance: Tax, Discretion and the Rule of Law / Ch. Evans, J. Freedman, R. Krever (eds.). Amsterdam: IBFD, 2011. P. V.
Feld L.P., Frey B.S. Tax Сompliance as the Result of a Psychological Tax Contract: The Role of Incentives and Responsive Regulation // Law & Policy. 2007. Vol. 29, № 1. P. 102–120.
Ford C. Prospects for Scalability: Relationships and Uncertainty in Responsive Regulation // Regulation & Governance. 2013. Vol. 7, № 1. P. 14–29.
Freedman J. Responsive Regulation, Risk, and Rules: Applying the Theory to Tax Practice // UBC Law Review. 2012. Vol. 44, № 3. P. 627–662.
Givati Y. Resolving Legal Uncertainty: Th e Unfulfi lled Promise of Advance Tax Rulings // Virginia Tax Review. 2009. Vol. 29. P. 144–145 (Forthcoming).
Gribnau H. Cooperative Compliance: Some Procedural Tax Law Issues // in «Tax Assurance ». R. Russo (ed.), Deventer: Kluwer, 2015. P. 183–216.
Gribnau H. Corporate Social Responsibility and Tax Planning: Not by Rules Alone // Social & Legal Studies. 2015, Vol. 24, № 2. P. 225–250.
Gribnau H. Taxation, Reciprocity and Communicative Regulation // Tilburg Law Review. 2015. Vol. 20, № 2. P.191–212.
Jinno N., De Wit A. Trench Warfare on the Tax Fields: Bureaucratic Politics and Fiscal Decentralization in Japan [Electronic resource] // Japanstudien. № 7. Р. 107–134. URL: http://www.contemporary-japan.org/back_issues/japanstudien_7_reformen.
Lehmann Nielsen V., Parker Ch. Testing Responsive Regulation in Regulatory Enforcement // Regulation & Governance. 2009. Vol. 3, № 4. P. 376–399.
Leviner S. A. New Era of Tax Enforcement: From «Big Stick» to Responsive Regulation // University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform. 2009. Vol. 42, № 2. P. 381–429.
Mörth U. Soft Law in Governance and Regulation: An Interdisciplinary Analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2004. 240 рр.
Perez O. Responsive Regulation and Second-Order Refl exivity: On the Limits of Regulatory Intervention // University British Columbia, 2011. Vol. 44, № 3, 2011. Р. 743– 778.
Pollack S.D. Tax Complexity, Reform, and the Illusions of Tax // George Mason Law Review. 1994. Vol. 2. № 2. P. 319–359;
White M. J. Why are Taxes so Complex and Who Benefi ts? // Tax Note. 1990. Vol. 47. P. 342–344;
Witteveen W, Bart van Klink. Why Is Soft Law Really Law? A Communicative Approach to Legislation // RegelMaat. 1999. № 3. P. 127–140.
OECD Public Governance Review: Co-operative Tax Compliance: Building Better Tax Control Frameworks, Paris: OECD Publishing, 13 May 2016 [Electronic resource] URL: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/taxation/co-operative-tax-compliance_9789264253384-en;
OECD Public Governance Review: Rethinking Tax Services: Th e changing Role of the Tax Service Providers in the SME Tax Compliance. Paris: OECD Publishing, 13 May 2016 [Electronic resource] URL: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/taxation/rethinkingtax-services_9789264256200-en;
OECD Public Governance Review: Technologies for Better Tax Administration: A Practical Guide for Revenue Bodies. Paris: OECD Publishing, 13 May 2016 [Electronic resource] URL: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/taxation/technologies-for-better-tax-administration_9789264256439-en;
OECD Public Governance Review: Advanced Analytics for Better Tax Administration: Putting Data to Work, Paris: OECD Publishing, 13 May 2016. [Electronic resource] URL: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/taxation/advanced-analytics-for-better-tax-administration_ 9789264256453-en.
Information: Financial Law Review, 2018, Issue 10 (2)/ 2018, pp. 11-29
Article type: Original article
Siberian Federal University, 6 Maerchaka street, Krasnoyarsk 660075, Russia
Published at: 20.09.2018
Article status: Open
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
English