Roman Arbitration in the Greek Oikumene in the Third–Second Century BCE: Some Observations

Maciej  Piegdoń

Roman Arbitration in the Greek Oikumene in the Third–Second Century BCE: Some Observations

Publication date: 06.12.2018

ELECTRUM, 2018, Volume 25, pp. 27 - 46

https://doi.org/10.4467/20800909EL.18.003.8923

Authors

Pobierz pełny tekst

PDF

Titles

Roman Arbitration in the Greek Oikumene in the Third–Second Century BCE: Some Observations

Abstract

Rome’s expansion in the Hellenistic world had an impact on the use of various instruments of diplomacy by the Romans, including arbitration, commonly used by and popular among the Greeks. The Romans did not have the desire to become arbitrators of the Greek world, but it was important to them to take advantage of the situation they encountered there and to achieve their goals. The Greeks, who had been used to employing various, more or less sophisticated, diplomatic instruments, saw the Roman Republic, a new player in their world, in the same way as the other large and mighty powers which could be appealed to as arbitrators. Rome did not become an arbitrator in Greek matters of its own will, but due to the fact that the Greek world itself appointed it to this role when it replaced the Hellenistic monarchies. The Romans became involved in solving disputes in the Greek world only when they had to. Despite being offered this role, the Senate had no intention of being an “arbitration court” for the confl icted Greek states. Roman arbitrators acted on the basis of the authority given to them by the Senate (senatus consulta), which fi rst became familiar with the cause of the dispute. Disputes were usually solved by Roman offi cials (proconsul, governor) or specially delegated legates and decemviri with prepared instructions which gave them the authority to solve the matter on the spot and to enforce the decisions they made. The procedure applied both to the Greek world and to the western part of the Mediterranean Sea, where Rome held power (North Africa, Italy). However, what differentiated the arbitration in Italy and the western part of Rome’s dominion from the one in the Greek world was the Republic appointing other Greek states (poleis or leagues) to arbitrate on its behalf. When deciding to arbitrate, the Romans were usually not interested in the history of the dispute, but solved the disagreement or confl ict on the basis of the status quo, without going into the details of who had been right previously. This was different from the rules of arbitration in the Greek world, where earlier mediation was taken into consideration. Perhaps this was a result of the difference between the Roman and the Greek worlds in terms of property right. The Roman law of property had an important distinction between legal ownership of a thing (dominium or proprietas), called property right, and the actual possession of a thing (possessio). For the Republic, this approach made it easier to side with their allies participating in a dispute, even if they were wrong. This attitude mainly protected the interests of the allied state, unless it was benefi cial to Rome to act against them.

Keywords

Arbitratio, Roman Republic, Hellenistic world, mediation.

References

Download references

Ager, S.L. (1991), Rhodos: The Rise and Fall of a Neutral Diplomat, Historia 40: 10–41.

Ager, S.L. (1996), Interstate Arbitrations in the Greek World, 337–90 B.C., Berkeley.

Ager, S.L. (2009), Roman Perspectives on Greek Diplomacy. The Conceptual Clash: Greek Diplomacy of Compromise and Roman iustum bellum, in: C. Eilers (ed.), Diplomats and Diplomacy in the Roman World, Leiden–Boston: 28–58.

Badian, E. (1958), Foreign Clientelae 264–70, Oxford.

Bellen, H. (1985), Metus Gallicus – Metus Punicus. Zum Furchtmotive in der römischen Republik, Wiesbaden–Stuttgart.

Berthold, R.M. (1984), Rhodes in the Hellenistic Age, Ithaca–London.

Bourdin, S. (2005), Ardée et les Rutules : réflexions sur l’émergence et le maintien des identités ethniques des populations du Latium préromain, MEFR 117 (2): 585–631.

Bourdin, S. (2012), Les peoples de l’Italie préromaine. Identités, territoires et relations inter-ethniques en Italie centrale et septentrionale (VIIIe–Ier s. av. J.-C.), Rome.

Braund, D.C. (1984), Rome and the Friendly Kings: The Character of Client Kingship, New York.

Bresson, A. (1998), Rhodes, Cnide et les Lyciens au début du IIe siècle av. J.-C., RÉA 100: 65–88.

Bresson, A. (1999), Rhodes and Lycia in Hellenistic Times, in: V. Gabrielsen (ed.), Hellenistic Rhodes: Politics, Culture, and Society, Cambridge: 98–131.

Bresson, A. (2003), Les intérêys rhodiens en Carie à l’époque hellénistique, jusqu’en 167 av. J.-C., Pallas 62: 169–192.

Buonopane, A. (1992), La duplice iscrizione confinaria di Monte Venda (Padova), in: L. Gasperini (ed.), Rupes loquentes, Roma: 207–223.

Burton, P.J. (2011), Friendship and Empire: Roman Diplomacy and Imperialism in the Middle Republic (353–146 B.C.), Cambridge.

Calderazzo, L. (1997), Arbitrati romani in Cisalpina (197–89 a.C.): problemi e status quaestionis, Rivista di studi Liguri 62: 25–46.

Camia, F. (2009), Roma e le poleis. L’intervento di Roma nelle controversie territoriali tra communità greche di Grecia e d’Asia Minore nel secondo secolo a.C.: le testimonianze epigrafiche, Atene.

Canali De Rossi, F. (2016), Le relazioni diplomatiche di Roma, vol. V: Dalle pace infida alla espulsione di Antioco dalla Grecia (194–190 a.C.), Roma.

Canali De Rossi, F. (2017), Le relazioni diplomatiche di Roma, vol. VI: Dalla spedizione degli Scipioni in Asia alla pace di Apamea (190–188 a.C.), Roma.

Carusi, Ch. (2003), Isole e peree in Asia Minore. Contributi allo studio dei rapporti tra poleis insulari e territory continentali dipendenti, Pisa.

Cary, M. (1926), A Roman Arbitration in the Second Century B.C., JRS 16: 196–200.

Cornell, T. (1989), The Conquest of Italy, CAH2 VII: 351–419.

Cornell, T. (1995), The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000–264 BC), London–New York.

Cursi, M.F. (2014), International Relationships in the Ancient World, Fundamina 20: 186–195.

De Ruggiero, E. (1898), L’arbitrato pubblico in relazione col private presso i Romani, Roma.

Derow, P. (1989), Rome, the Fall of Macedon and the Sack of Corinth, CAH2 VIII: 290–323.

Dmitriev, S. (2011), Rhodes between Rome and Perseus, in: S. Dmitriev, The Greek Slogan of Freedom and Early Roman Politics in Greece, Oxford: 284–312.

Du Plessis, P. (2015), Property, in: D. Johnson (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Law, New York: 175–198.

Eckstein, A.M. (2008), Rome Enters the Greek East: From Anarchy to Hierarchy in the Hellenistic Mediterranean, 230–170 B.C., Oxford.

Errington, R.M. (2010), Historia świata hellenistycznego 323–30 p.n.e., transl. A. Gąsior-Niemiec, Kraków.

Ferrary, J.-L. (1988), Philhellénisme et impérialisme. Aspects idéologiques de la conquête romaine du monde hellénistique, de la seconde guerre de Macédoine à la guerre contre Mithridate, Rome.

Ferrary, J.-L. (1995), Ius fetiale et diplomatie, in: E. Frézouls, A. Jacquemin (eds.), Les relations internationales. Actes du Colloque de Strasbourg (15–17 juin 1993), Paris: 411–432.

Flaig, E. (2013), Zrytualizowana polityka rzymska. Znaki, gesty i władza w starożytnym Rzymie, Poznań.

Forsythe, G. (2005), A Critical History of Early Rome, Berkeley–Los Angeles–London.

Gabrielsen, V. (1997), The Naval Aristocracy of Hellenistic Rhodes, Aarhus.

Gnolli, T. (2004), Samo in èta ellenistica e romana: ricerche, storiche ed epigrafiche, in: E. Cavallini (ed.), Samo, storia, letteratura, scienza. Atti delle giornate di studio, Ravenna, 14–16 novembre 2002, Pisa–Roma: 249–274.

Grabowski, T. (2005), Ptolemeusze i Rzym. Przyjaźń czy zależność, Kraków.

Gruen, E. (1984), The Hellenistic World and the Coming of Rome, 2 vols., Berkeley.

György, D. (1970), Ownership in Ancient and Preclassical Roman Law, Budapest.

Habicht, C. (1989), Seleucids and Their Rivals, CAH2 VIII: 324–387.

Habicht, C. (2003), Rhodian Amphora Stamps and Rhodian Eponyms, RÉA 105: 541–578.

Hammond, N.G.L. (1999), Starożytna Macedonia. Początki, instytucje, dzieje, transl. A.S. Chankowski, Warszawa.

Harris, W.V. (1971), Rome in Etruria and Umbria, Oxford.

Harris, W.V. (1992), War and Imperialism in Republican Rome 327–70 B.C., Oxford.

Heller, A. (2006), „Les bêtises des Grecs”. Conflicts et rivalités entre cites d’Asie et de Bithynie à l’époque romaine (129 a.C.–235 p.C.), Bordeaux.

Holleaux, M. (1935), Rome, la Grèce, et les monarchies hellénistiques au IIIe siècle avant J.-C. (273–205), Paris.

Jehne, M., Pina Polo, F. (eds.) (2015), Foreign clientelae in the Roman Empire: A Reconsideration, Stuttgart.

Jurewicz, A.R. (2011), Organizacja wymiaru sprawiedliwości, in: A. Jurewicz, R. Sajkowski, B. Sitek, J. Szczerbowski, A. Świętoń (eds.), Rzymskie prawo publiczne. Wybrane zagadnienia, Olsztyn: 319–394.

Kaser M. (1996), Das römische Zivilprozeßrecht, 2 Aufl., München.

Kuryłowicz, M. (2013), Prawo rzymskie. Historia, tradycja, współczesność, Lublin.

Lazenby, J.F. (2015), Wojna Hannibala. Historia militarna drugiej wojny punickiej, transl. T. Ładoń, Oświęcim.

Ma, J. (1999), Antiochos III and the Cities of Western Asia Minor, Oxford.

Magdelain, A. (2015), Aspects arbitraux de la justice civile archaïque à Rome, in: Ius Imperium Auctoritas. Études de droit romain, Rome: 591–652.

Magie, D. (1950), Roman Rule in the Asia minor to the End of Third Century after Christ, 2 vols., Princeton.

Magnetto, A. (2009), La querelle territoriale entre Samos et Priène. Propositions pour un débat, Topoi 16: 7–17.

Magnetto, A. (2015), L’ arbitrato dei Romani nel rapporto con la diplomazia dei Greci. Alcuni spunti di riflessione, in: B. Grass, G. Stouder, J.L. Ferrary, S. Pittia, P. Sanchez (eds.), La diplomatie romaine sous la République: réflexions sur une pratique, Besançon: 65–86.

Magnetto, A. (2016), Interstate Arbitration and Foreign Judges, in: E.M. Harris, M. Canevaro (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Greek Law, Oxford, Online Publication Date: Jul 2016, DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199599257.013.20.

Marshall, A.J. (1980), The Survival and Development of International Jurisdiction in the Greek World under Roman Rule, ANRW II 13: 626–662.

Masri, L. (2016), Rome, Diplomacy, and the Rituals of Empire, Historia 65: 325–347.

Matthaei, L. (1907), On the Classification of the Roman Allies, CQ 1: 182–204.

Oakley, S. (2002), The Roman Conquest of Italy, in: J. Rich, G. Shipley (eds.), War and Society in the Roman World, London–New York: 9–37.

Piccirilli, L. (1973), Gli arbitrati interstatali greci, Firenze.

Piegdoń, M. (2014a), Viam feceit… ponteis… poseivei… forum aedisque poplicas heic fecei: Political Activity of M. Aemilius Lepidus in Northern Italy, in: K. Twardowska, M. Salamon, S. Sprawski, M. Stachura, S. Turlej (eds.), Within the Circle of Ancient Ideas and Virtues: Studies in Honour of Professor Maria Dzielska, Kraków: 197–208.

Piegdoń, M. (2014b), Some Remarks on War Rituals in Archaic Italy and Rome and the Beginnings of the Roman Imperialism, Electrum 21: 87–97.

Popławski, M.S. (2011), Bellum Romanum. Sakralność wojny i prawa rzymskiego, Lublin.

Raeder, A. (1912), L’ arbitrage international chez les Hellènes, Kristiania.

Reger, G. (1999), The Relations between Rhodes and Caria from 246 to 167 BC, in: V. Gabrielsen, P. Bilde, T. Engberg-Pedersen, L. Hannestad, J. Zahle (eds.), Hellenistic Rhodes: Politics, Culture, and Society, Cambridge: 76–97.

Rich, J. (2002), Fear, Greed and Glory: The Causes of Roman War-making in the Middle Republic, in: J. Rich, G. Shipley (eds.), War and Society in the Roman World, London–New York: 44–68.

Roebuck, D. (2001), Ancient Greek Arbitration, Oxford.

Roebuck, D., Loynes de Fumichon, B. de (2004), Roman Arbitration, Oxford.

Rossignani, M.P. (1995), Gli Aemili e l’Italia del Nord, in: G. Cavalieri Manasse, E. Roffia (eds.), Splendida civitas nostra. Miscellanea di studi archeologici in onore di Antonio Frova, Roma: 61–75.

Sherk, R. (1984), Rome and the Greek East to the Death of Augustus, Cambridge.

Sherwin-White, A.N. (1973), The Roman Citizenship, Oxford.

Shipley, G. (1987), A History of Samos 800–188 BC, Oxford.

Smith, J.C. (2006), The Roman Clan: The Gens from Ancient Ideology to Modern Anthropology, Cambridge.

Snowdon, M. (2015), Beyond Clientela: The Instrumentality of Amicitia in the Greek East, in: M. Jehne, F. Pina Polo (eds.), Foreign clientelae in the Roman Empire: A Reconsideration, Stuttgart: 209–224.

Tod, M.N. (1913), International Arbitration amongst the Greeks, Oxford.

Toynbee, A.J. (1965), Hannibal’s Legacy: The Hannibalic War’s Effects on Roman Life, 2 vols., London.

Wiemer, H.-U. (2002), Krieg, Handel und Piraterie: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte des hellenistischen Rhodos, Berlin.

Wiemer, H.-U. (2011), Early Hellenistic Rhodes: The Struggle for Independence and the Dream of Hegemony, in: A. Erskine, L. Llewellyn-Jones (eds.), Creating a Hellenistic World, Oxford: 123–146.

Will, E. (1966), Histoire politique du monde hellénistique (323–30 av. J.-C.), 2 vols., Nancy.

Yakobson, A. (2009), Public Opinion, Foreign Policy and ‘Just War’ in the Late Republic, in: C. Eilers (ed.), Diplomats and Diplomacy in the Roman World, Leiden–Boston.

Ziółkowski, A. (2004), Historia Rzymu, Poznań.

Żołnierczuk, M. (1978), Rzymskie sądownictwo polubowne (okres przedklasyczny i klasyczny), Lublin.

Information

Information: ELECTRUM, 2018, Volume 25, pp. 27 - 46

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/20800909EL.18.003.8923

Article type: Original article

Authors

Maciej Piegdoń

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1720-5913

Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków, Poland

Published at: 06.12.2018

Article status: Open

Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Percentage share of authors:

Maciej Piegdoń (Author) - 100%

Article corrections:

Publication languages:

English

View count: 1606

Number of downloads: 1275

<p>Roman Arbitration in the Greek Oikumene in the Third–Second Century BCE: Some Observations</p>

Download xml